Argument and Evidence: Critical Analysis for the Social Sciences
Autor Peter J. Phelan, Peter J. Reynoldsen Limba Engleză Paperback – 7 dec 1995
* the ability to reason with ideas and evidence
* to formulate arguments effectively
* to appreciate the interplay between ideas and evidence in academic and media debate
Argument and Evidence presents aspects of informal logic and statistical theory in a comprehensible way, enabling students to acquire skills in critical thinking which will outlast their undergraduate studies. Ideal as a companion for courses on methodology or study skills, Argument and Evidence will also be useful for other disciplines in the social sciences and humanities.
Preț: 324.05 lei
Preț vechi: 417.21 lei
-22% Nou
Puncte Express: 486
Preț estimativ în valută:
62.02€ • 65.43$ • 51.68£
62.02€ • 65.43$ • 51.68£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 02-16 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780415113731
ISBN-10: 0415113733
Pagini: 260
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.48 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 0415113733
Pagini: 260
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.48 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Cuprins
Preface 1.Introduction 2.Argument and Evidence 3.Context, Convention and Communication 4.An Informal Analysis of Arguments 5.Patterns of Reasoning 6.Establising Validity 7.Critical Analysis in Practice 7.Assumptions 8.Evidence as Ground Belief 10.What Counts as Evidence? 11.Pesenting and Summarizing Evidence 12.Furthering Knowledge 13.Probability and Uncertainty 14.Probability Theory Applied 15.Estimation and Reliability 16.Testing Hypotheses Appendices Glossary References
Notă biografică
Peter J. Phelan, Peter J. Reynolds
Descriere
This book is concerned with the most fundamental aspects of academic study; the abilities to reason with ideas and evidence, to formulate arguments effectively and to appreciate the interplay between ideas and evidence in debate.