Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Cartesian Method and the Problem of Reduction

Autor Emily R. Grosholz
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 31 ian 1991
Cartesian method, construed as a way of organizing domains of knowledge according to the `order of reason', was a powerful reductive tool. Descartes produced important results in mathematics, physics, and metaphysics by relating certain complex items and problems back to simpler elements that serve as starting points for his inquiries. However, his reductive method also impoverished these domains in important ways, for it tended to restrict geometry to the study of straight line segments, physics to the study of ambiguously constituted bits of matter in motion, and metaphysics to the study of the isolated, incorporeal knower. This book examines in detail the impact, negative and positive, of Descartes's method on his scientific and philosophical enterprises, exemplified by the Geometry, the Principles, the Treatise of Man, and the Meditations.
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 74040 lei

Preț vechi: 112761 lei
-34% Nou

Puncte Express: 1111

Preț estimativ în valută:
14174 14755$ 11669£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 20-27 ianuarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780198242505
ISBN-10: 0198242506
Pagini: 170
Ilustrații: text-figures
Dimensiuni: 144 x 223 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.35 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Clarendon Press
Colecția Clarendon Press
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Cuprins

Introduction; Descartes's Geometry and Pappus' problem; Treatment of curves: notion of genre; Descartes's Principles: physical unities; Laws of motion; Historical context of Cartesian physics; Descartes's physiology; The Meditations re-examined; Bibliography; Index.

Recenzii

'a sophisticated work connected by a coherent perspective or specific thesis'Roger Ariew, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Mind, Vol. 101, No. 402, April 1992
'the fundamental thesis does capture something which is clearly at work in Descartes, and it has exactly the consequences for Descartes' work which the author explains'Desmond M. Clarke, University College, Cork, British Journal for the History of Science, 25