Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Congress and the Constitution: Constitutional Conflicts

Autor Neal Devins, Keith Whittington
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 17 iul 2005
For more than a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court has turned a skeptical eye toward Congress. Distrustful of Congress's capacity to respect constitutional boundaries, the Court has recently overturned federal legislation at a historically unprecedented rate. This intensified judicial scrutiny highlights the need for increased attention to how Congress approaches constitutional issues. In this important collection, leading scholars in law and political science examine the role of Congress in constitutional interpretation, demonstrating how to better integrate the legislative branch into understandings of constitutional practice. Several contributors offer wide-ranging accounts of the workings of Congress. They look at lawmakers' attitudes toward Congress's role as a constitutional interpreter, the offices within Congress that help lawmakers learn about constitutional issues, Congress's willingness to use its confirmation power to shape constitutional decisions by both the executive and the courts, and the frequency with which congressional committees take constitutional questions into account. Other contributors address congressional deliberation, paying particular attention to whether Congress's constitutional interpretations are sound. Still others examine how Congress and the courts should respond to one another's decisions, suggesting how the courts should evaluate Congress's work and considering how lawmakers respond to Court decisions that strike down federal legislation. While some essayists are inclined to evaluate Congress's constitutional interpretation positively, others argue that it could be improved and suggest institutional and procedural reforms toward that end. Whatever their conclusions, all of the essays underscore the pervasive and crucial role that Congress plays in shaping the meaning of the Constitution.
Contributors. David P. Currie, Neal Devins, William N. Eskridge Jr.. John Ferejohn, Louis Fisher, Elizabeth Garrett, Michael J. Gerhardt, Michael J. Klarman, Bruce G. Peabody, J. Mitchell Pickerill, Barbara Sinclair, Mark Tushnet, Adrian Vermeule, Keith E. Whittington, John C. Yoo
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Constitutional Conflicts

Preț: 26107 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 392

Preț estimativ în valută:
4999 5205$ 4147£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 14-28 februarie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780822336129
ISBN-10: 082233612X
Pagini: 336
Ilustrații: 12 tables, 3 figures
Dimensiuni: 190 x 236 x 21 mm
Greutate: 0.49 kg
Editura: MD – Duke University Press
Seria Constitutional Conflicts


Cuprins

Acknowledgments vii
Introduction / Neal Devins and Keith E. Whittington 1
Prolegomena for a Sampler: Extrajudicial Interpretation of the Constitution, 1789–1861 / David P. Currie 18
Congressional Attitudes toward Constitutional Interpretation / Bruce G. Peabody 39
Constitutional Analysis by Congressional Staff Agencies / Louis Fisher 64
Hearing about the Constitution in Congressional Committees / Keith E. Whittington 87
The Federal Appointments Process as Constitutional Interpretation / Michael J. Gerhardt 110
Lawyers in Congress / John C. Yoo 131
Congressional Responses to Judicial Review / J. Mitchell Pickerill 151
Court, Congress, and Civil Rights / Michael J. Klarman 173
Quasi-Constitutional Law: The Rise of Super-Statutes / William N. Eskridge Jr. and John Ferejohn 198
Congressional Fact Finding and the Scope of Judicial Review / Neal Devins 220
Institutional Design of a Thayerian Congress / Elizabeth Garrett and Adrian Vermeule 242
Evaluating Congressional Constitutional Interpretation: Some Criteria and Two Informal Case Studies / Mark Tushnet 269
Can Congress Be Trusted with the Constitution? The Effects of Incentives and Procedures / Barbara Sinclair 293
About the Contributors 313
Index 315

Recenzii

“Congress and the Constitution is a timely and provocative book on whether, when, and how Congress thinks about the meaning of the Constitution. The excellent scholarship in this volume raises deep questions about the relationship between Congress and the courts in interpreting the Constitution and sets an agenda for further work in this important area. In so doing, the book makes a significant contribution.”—Elena Kagan, Dean of Harvard Law School“The subject of this collection—the treatment of the Constitution by legislators in Congress—is both extremely interesting and important, and I do not believe that there is a single book that is so effective in bringing together a wide range of relevant materials.”—Sanford Levinson, author of Wrestling with Diversity"One of the strengths of the essays in this volume is that they show very good awareness of recent theoretical and empirical scholarship into how Congress works and integrate these findings into discussions of congressional dealings with the Constitution. This book does not focus merely on evaluating Congress' ability to get the Constitution right; it uses sophisticated understandings of congressional structure and members' incentives to explicate the situations in which Congress interprets the Constitution."—Joseph L. Smith, Law and Politics Book Review“The editors observe that the role of Congress vis-à-vis the Constitution has been an underresearched subject. They hope that their book will help fill this gap and will point the way to future research. It succeeds on both counts... [A]ll [chapters] make thoughtful points, and all will repay careful reading by professionals and advanced students.” —Paul Lenchner, Perspectives on Political Science
"Congress and the Constitution is a timely and provocative book on whether, when, and how Congress thinks about the meaning of the Constitution. The excellent scholarship in this volume raises deep questions about the relationship between Congress and the courts in interpreting the Constitution and sets an agenda for further work in this important area. In so doing, the book makes a significant contribution."--Elena Kagan, Dean of Harvard Law School "The subject of this collection--the treatment of the Constitution by legislators in Congress--is both extremely interesting and important, and I do not believe that there is a single book that is so effective in bringing together a wide range of relevant materials."--Sanford Levinson, author of Wrestling with Diversity "One of the strengths of the essays in this volume is that they show very good awareness of recent theoretical and empirical scholarship into how Congress works and integrate these findings into discussions of congressional dealings with the Constitution. This book does not focus merely on evaluating Congress' ability to get the Constitution right; it uses sophisticated understandings of congressional structure and members' incentives to explicate the situations in which Congress interprets the Constitution."--Joseph L. Smith, Law and Politics Book Review "The editors observe that the role of Congress vis-a-vis the Constitution has been an underresearched subject. They hope that their book will help fill this gap and will point the way to future research. It succeeds on both counts... [A]ll [chapters] make thoughtful points, and all will repay careful reading by professionals and advanced students." --Paul Lenchner, Perspectives on Political Science

Notă biografică

Neal Devins and Keith E. Whittington, eds.

Textul de pe ultima copertă

"The subject of this collection--the treatment of the Constitution by legislators in Congress--is both extremely interesting and important, and I do not believe that there is any other single book that is so effective in bringing together a wide range of relevant materials."--Sanford Levinson, author of "Wrestling with Diversity"

Descriere

Essays contest the notion of the absolute preeminence of judicial review in constitutional interpretation, analyzing the role of Congress as a constitutional interpreter and responsible constitutional agent