Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue
Editat de Michiru Nagatsu, Dr Attilia Ruzzeneen Limba Engleză Hardback – 29 mai 2019
Preț: 820.39 lei
Preț vechi: 1454.20 lei
-44% Nou
Puncte Express: 1231
Preț estimativ în valută:
157.05€ • 161.52$ • 130.29£
157.05€ • 161.52$ • 130.29£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 28 ianuarie-11 februarie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781474248754
ISBN-10: 1474248756
Pagini: 408
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.73 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1474248756
Pagini: 408
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.73 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
Caracteristici
Opens up new dialogues between philosophers of social science and leading social scientists, allowing philosophers of social science to directly address cutting-edge social science work
Notă biografică
Michiru Nagatsu is Associate Professor at Practical Philosophy and HELSUS (Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science) at the University of Helsinki, Finland.Attilia Ruzzene is Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Bergamo, Italy.
Cuprins
Preface Introduction, Michiru Nagatsu (University of Helsinki, Finland) and Attilia Ruzzene (University of Bergamo, Italy)Part I: The plurality of approaches, disciplines and theories 1. Integration and the disunity of the social sciences, Christophe Heintz (Central European University, Hungary), Mathieu Charbonneau (Central European University, Hungary) and Jay Fogelman (Central European University, Hungary) Commentary: Plurality and Pluralisms for the Social Sciences, Raffaella Campaner (University of Bologna, Italy) 2. The Eroding Artificial/Natural Distinction? Some Consequences for Ecology and Economics, C. Tyler DesRoches (Arizona State University, USA), S. Andrew Inkpen (Dalhousie University, Canada), Tom L. Green (Universidad del Rosario, Colombia) Commentary: Obstacles to interdisciplinary research: metaphysical, cognitive and axiological, Michiru Nagatsu (University of Helsinki, Finland) 3. Team Agency and Conditional Games, Andre Hofmeyr (University of Cape Town, South Africa) and Don Ross (University of Cape Town, South Africa) Commentary: Explaining prosocial behaviour: team reasoning or social influence?, Cédric Paternotte (Sorbonne University Paris, France) Part II: From methodological choice to methodological mix 4. The Methodologies of Behavioral Econometrics, Glenn W. Harrison (Georgia State University, USA) Commentary: Reflections on Decision Research and its Empiricism: Four Comments Inspired by Harrison, Nathaniel T. Wilcox (Chapman University, USA) 5. Reasons for Using Mixed Methods in the Evaluation of Complex Projects, Michael Woolcock (Harvard University, USA) Commentary: Why Mixed Methods Are Necessary for Evaluating Any Policy, Nancy Cartwright (Durham University, UK) 6. From an individual to a holistic lens: Reassessing marketing models to deliver impact, Charlotte Vangsgaard (ReD Associates) Commentary: Unity and Disunity in Consumer Behaviour Research, Attilia Ruzzene (University of Bergamo, Italy) 7. The Fish Tank Complex of Social Modelling on Space and Time in Understanding Collective Dynamics, Tommaso Venturini (French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation, France) Commentary: Versioning and structural change, Petri Ylikoski (University of Helsinki, Finland) 8. Social Statistics Using Strategic Structuralism and Pluralism, Wendy Olsen (Manchester University, UK) Commentary: Heterogeneity, plasticity, and mechanisms: Comments on Olsen, Daniel Little (University of Michigan-Dearbon, USA) Part III: Explanation; Theorizing; Performativity 9. Causal Mechanisms and Qualitative Causal Inference in the Social Sciences, David Waldner (University of Virginia, USA) Commentary: An Alternative Hypothesis about Process Tracing: Comments on "Causal Mechanisms and Qualitative Causal Inference in the Social Sciences", Daniel Steel (University of Michigan-Dearborn, USA) 10. How to theorize? On the changing role and meaning of theory in the social sciences, Mikael Carleheden (University of Copenhagen, Denmark) Commentary: Social Theory and Underdetermination: A Philosophical History and Reconstruction, Stephen Turner (University of South Florida, USA) 11. Assembling economic actors: time-varying rates and the new electricity consumer, Daniel Breslau (Virginia Tech, USA) Commentary: Assembling the economic actors, Nicolas Brisset (Université Côte d'Azur, France) Index
Recenzii
The boundaries between the social sciences and philosophy are being re-traced. In this compilation, some insightful social scientists reflect on their methods in critical discussion with up-to-date philosophers. See for yourself where the future of social research will be.
An interesting volume that ingeniously expands on the belief that a fruitful interaction between philosophy and social science can only start from a carefully considered, genuine dialogue among researchers from both sides. An insightful resource for teaching at different levels of competence.
The volume fully embodies the growing (and for a time, much needed) tendency in the field of Philosophy of the Social Science that tries to connect philosophical reflection with the best practices and the more promising research programs in the Social Sciences. Nagatsu's and Ruzzene's work does this in a bold, innovative way, and thus interestingly complements recent efforts that have collectively entrench this close-to-the-practice approach to the field.
An interesting volume that ingeniously expands on the belief that a fruitful interaction between philosophy and social science can only start from a carefully considered, genuine dialogue among researchers from both sides. An insightful resource for teaching at different levels of competence.
The volume fully embodies the growing (and for a time, much needed) tendency in the field of Philosophy of the Social Science that tries to connect philosophical reflection with the best practices and the more promising research programs in the Social Sciences. Nagatsu's and Ruzzene's work does this in a bold, innovative way, and thus interestingly complements recent efforts that have collectively entrench this close-to-the-practice approach to the field.