Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Contemporary Supreme Court Cases: Landmark Decisions since Roe v. Wade [2 volumes]

Autor Donald E. Lively, D. Scott Broyles
en Limba Engleză Quantity pack – 21 feb 2016 – vârsta până la 17 ani
With its blend of accessible writing and actual excerpts from Court opinions, this book serves to explain the legal and cultural underpinnings of landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions of the past 35 years-and to illuminate how these decisions have shaped the trajectory and character of modern American society.As the nation's law defines society, society defines the law. As the nation's fundamental law, the U.S. Constitution is the overarching statement of the people's will. Interpreting the Constitution, however, is no simple task. This book examines more than 100 landmark Supreme Court cases from 1973 to the present, providing readers with insights into decisions that have had a profound impact on American politics, commerce, culture, and life.Organized categorically, this book serves readers either as a comprehensive review of modern constitutional law or as a ready reference source. It includes entries on Supreme Court decision-making regarding high-interest issues such as abortion (Roe v. Wade, 1973; Gonzales v. Carthart, 2007), climate change (Massachusetts v. EPA, 2007), voting rights (Bush v. Gore, 2000), free speech (Texas v. Johnson, 1989), the death penalty (Roper v. Simmons, 2005), immigration (Arizona v. United States, 2012), campaign financing (Citizens United v. FEC, 2010), gun control (District of Columbia v. Heller, 2008), the Affordable Care Act (National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 2012), and gay marriage (United States v. Windsor, 2013). The book not only interprets key Court decisions but also provides critical context and perspective that makes the subject matter easier to understand and more meaningful, especially for readers without an extensive background in Constitutional law. Bibliographies are provided at the end of each case to direct those seeking to delve more deeply into specific topics.
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 83943 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 1259

Preț estimativ în valută:
16070 16704$ 13324£

Carte indisponibilă temporar

Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781440837128
ISBN-10: 1440837120
Pagini: 745
Dimensiuni: 185 x 262 x 58 mm
Greutate: 2.09 kg
Ediția:Enlarged
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția ABC-CLIO
Locul publicării:New York, United States

Caracteristici

Presents easy-to-understand breakdowns of competing perspectives on contemporary constitutional issues that illuminate divisions within the Court

Notă biografică

Donald E. Lively, JD, is president of Arizona Summit Law School. He conceptualized and was founding dean and chancellor at Florida Coastal School of Law.D. Scott Broyles, JD, PhD, is associate professor of law at the Charlotte School of Law.

Cuprins

PrefaceAlphabetical Table of CasesChronological Table of CasesVOLUME 1Part I. Separation and Distribution of Powers1. The Power of Judicial ReviewUnited States v. Nixon (1974)2. The Power of the PresidentDames and Moore v. Regan (1981)Morrison v. Olson (1988)Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004)Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006)Boumediene v. Bush (2008)Medellin v. Texas (2008)3. The Power of CongressImmigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha (1983)King v. Burwell (2015)Part II. Power to Regulate or Affect the Economy4. Federal PowerUnited States v. Lopez (1995)Gonzales v. Raich (2005)National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius (2012)5. State PowerCity of Philadelphia v. New Jersey (1978)Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (2007)6. Federal Preemption of State PowerPacific Gas and Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (1983)Arizona v. United States (2012)7. Privileges and ImmunitiesBaldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana (1978)Part III. Equality Concepts8. RaceKeyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado (1973)Milliken v. Bradley (1974)Washington v. Davis (1976)Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. (1989)Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena (1995)Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)Fisher v. University of Texas (2013)Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (2014)9. GenderCraig v. Boren (1976)United States v. Virginia (1996)10. Fundamental RightsEducationSan Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez (1973)VotingBush v. Gore (2000)Part IV. Individual Rights and Liberties11. First Amendment: Freedom of Speech (Content Regulation)TortsGertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974)Hustler Magazine v. Falwell (1988)Snyder v. Phelps (2011)ObscenityMiller v. California (1973)New York v. Ferber (1982)United States v. Stevens (2010)Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association (2011)Fighting WordsR.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)Virginia v. Black (2003)Commercial SpeechVirginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc. (1976)Symbolic SpeechTexas v. Johnson (1989)Campaign FinancingMcConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010)McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014)Student SpeechHazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)12. First Amendment: Freedom of Speech (Content-Neutral Regulation)Public ForumsPerry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association (1983)Rosenberger v. University of Virginia (1995)Secondary EffectsCity of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. (1986)Procedural RegulationMadsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc. (1994)Government Subsidies and ConditionsNational Endowment for the Arts v. Finley (1998)United States v. American Library Association, Inc. (2003)13. First Amendment: Freedom of AssociationRoberts v. United States Jaycees (1984)14. First Amendment: Freedom of the PressPrior RestraintNebraska Press Association v. Stuart (1976)The Newsgathering FunctionZurcher v. Stanford Daily (1978)Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court (1982)Medium-Specific StandardsMiami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo (1974)Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation (1978)Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (1989)Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (1994)Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997)Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002)VOLUME 215. First Amendment: Freedom of ReligionEstablishment ClauseLynch v. Donnelly (1984)Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)Lee v. Weisman (1992)Agostini v. Felton (1997)Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky (2005)Town of Greece v. Galloway (2014)Free Exercise ClauseChurch of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah (1993)Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014)Religion and Expressive FreedomGood News Club v. Milford Central School (2001)16. Second Amendment: Right to Keep and Bear ArmsDistrict of Columbia v. Heller (2008)McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010)17. Fourth Amendment: Search and SeizureDelaware v. Prouse (1979)United States v. Mendenhall (1980)Illinois v. Gates (1983)United States v. Leon (1984)Kyllo v. United States (2001)Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Earls (2002)United States v. Jones (2012)Riley v. California (2014)Fernandez v. California (2014)18. Due Process: Confessions and EntrapmentMincey v. Arizona (1978)Jacobson v. United States (1992)Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010)Salinas v. Texas (2013)19. Fifth Amendment: TakingsPenn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York (1978)Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992)Kelo v. City of New London (2005)Horne v. Department of Agriculture (2015)20. Sixth Amendment: Right to CounselNix v. Williams (1984)Kuhlmann v. Wilson (1986)Montejo v. Louisiana (2009)Padilla v. Kentucky (2010)21. Eighth Amendment: Cruel and Unusual PunishmentRoper v. Simmons (2005)Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008)Graham v. Florida (2010)Miller v. Alabama (2012)22. Fourteenth Amendment: Right of Privacy/Liberty InterestsAbortionRoe v. Wade (1973)Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989)Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992)Gonzales v. Carhart (2007)Sexual OrientationBowers v. Hardwick (1986)Lawrence v. Texas (2003)United States v. Windsor (2013)Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)Right to Refuse Medical TreatmentCruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health (1990)Washington v. Glucksberg (1997)Appendix: The Constitution of the United StatesGlossaryBibliographyIndex

Recenzii

[T]he authors meet their goal of creating a work 'relevant [and] accessible to a wide variety of audiences' without overdoing the legalese.
For any readers interested in the work of the Supreme Court and its impact on society and the law of the land, this work will provide much useful information. This work will benefit a wide range of libraries whose patrons seek an understanding of the Court's role in America.
Summing Up: Recommended. High school, community college, and undergraduate students; general readers.