Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Corporate Crime & the Use of Deferred & Non-Prosecution Agreements

Editat de Isobel E. Gilbert
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 15 feb 2011
Recent cases of corporate fraud and mismanagement heighten the Department of Justice's (DOJ) need to appropriately punish and deter corporate crime. Recently, DOJ has made more use of deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements (DPAs and NPAs), in which prosecutors may require company reform, and may also require companies to hire an independent monitor to oversee compliance. This book provides observations on corporate crime and the use of deferred and non-prosecution agreements.
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 84369 lei

Preț vechi: 109570 lei
-23% Nou

Puncte Express: 1266

Preț estimativ în valută:
16154 16821$ 13403£

Carte indisponibilă temporar

Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781617288692
ISBN-10: 1617288691
Pagini: 169
Ilustrații: tables
Dimensiuni: 155 x 229 x 17 mm
Greutate: 0.38 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Nova Science Publishers Inc

Cuprins

Preface; Opening Statement of Chairman John Conyers, Jr., before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law, Hearing on " Accountability, Transparency, and Uniformity in Corporate Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements"; Corporate Crime: Preliminary Observations on DOJ's Use and Oversight of Deferred Prosecution and Non-Prosecution Agreements (Statement of Eileen R Larence, Director, Homeland Security and Justice, (GAO); Prepared Statement of Christopher J Christie, Former U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, June 25, 2009; Statement of Gary G. Grindler, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, U.S. Dept. of Justice, before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, Hearing on "Accountability, Transparency, and Uniformity in Corporate Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements"; Testimony of Chuck Rosenberg, Hogan & Harrison, LLP, before the Committee on the Judiciary, Hearing on "Accountability, Transparency, and Uniformity in Corporate Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements"; Written Statement of Vikramaditya Khanna, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School, before the Committee on the Judiciary, Hearing on "Accountability, Transparency, and Uniformity in Corporate Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements"; Testimony of Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr., before the Committee on the Judiciary, Hearing on "Accountability, Transparency, and Uniformity in Corporate Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements"; Opening Statement of Congressman Bill Pascrell, Jr., Eighth Congressional District of New Jersey, before the Committee on the Judiciary, Hearing on "Accountability, Transparency, and Uniformity in Corporate Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements"; Corporate Crime: Prosecutors Adhered to Guidance in Selecting Monitors for Deferred Prosecution and Non-Prosecution Agreements, but DOJ could Better Communicate its Role in Resolving Conflicts (Statement of Eileen R. Larence, Director, Homeland Security and Justice, (GAO)); Statement of Gil M. Soffer, Co-Chair, National White Collar Practice, Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP, Former Associate Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Dept. of Justice, before the Committee on the Judiciary, Hearing on "Transparency and Integrity in Corporate Monitoring"; Written Statement of Brandon L. Garrett, Associate Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law, before the Committee on the Judiciary, Hearing on "Transparency and Integrity in Corporate Monitoring"; Corporate Crime: DOJ has Taken Steps to Better Track its Use of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements, but Should Evaluate Effectiveness (GAO); Index.