Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration: Holding Foreign Investors Accountable for Violations of International Law: International Litigation in Practice, cartea 13
Autor Edward Guntripen Limba Engleză Hardback – 20 iun 2024
Preț: 649.59 lei
Preț vechi: 792.18 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 974
Preț estimativ în valută:
124.38€ • 129.51$ • 103.19£
124.38€ • 129.51$ • 103.19£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 24-29 ianuarie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9789004420946
ISBN-10: 9004420940
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.44 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria International Litigation in Practice
ISBN-10: 9004420940
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.44 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria International Litigation in Practice
Notă biografică
Edward Guntrip, Ph.D., Brunel University, is a Senior Lecturer in International Law at the University of Sussex. He is a former solicitor and publishes in the fields of international investment law, investment arbitration and international human rights law.
Cuprins
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
Table of Treaties
Table of Cases
1Investment Arbitration and Counterclaims
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Foreign Investors, Investment Arbitration and International Law
1.3 Host State Courts
1.4 The Potential Role of Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration
1.5 Holding Foreign Investors Accountable for Breaches of International Law
2Jurisdiction over Counterclaims
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Consent to Investment Arbitration
2.3 Jurisdiction over Counterclaims
2.3.1icsid Convention and icsid Arbitration Rules
2.3.2icsid Additional Facility Arbitration Rules
2.3.3uncitral Arbitration Rules
2.3.4Analysis of Arbitral Practice
2.4 Recalibrating Consent to Counterclaims
2.5 Preliminary Conclusions
3The Nexus between Claims and Counterclaims
3.1 Introduction
3.2 The Good Administration of Justice and Counterclaims
3.3 The Nexus between Claims and Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration
3.3.1icsid Convention and icsid Arbitration Rules
3.3.2icsid Additional Facility Arbitration Rules
3.3.3uncitral Arbitration Rules
3.3.4Analysis of Arbitral Practice
3.4 Establishing the Nexus between a Claim and Counterclaim
3.5 Preliminary Conclusions
4Applicable Law and Counterclaims
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Determining the Applicable Law
4.3 Applicable Law and Arbitration Rules
4.3.1icsid Convention and icsid Arbitration Rules
4.3.2icsid Additional Facility Arbitration Rules
4.3.3uncitral Arbitration Rules
4.3.4Analysis of Arbitral Practice
4.4 Tailoring Applicable Law Provisions to Counterclaims
4.5 Preliminary Conclusions
5The Source of the Counterclaim
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Suitable Legal Obligations
5.2.1Treaty Law
5.2.2Customary International Law
5.2.3Jus Cogens
5.2.4Domestic Law
5.2.5Soft Law
5.3 The Desirable Characteristics of the Legal Obligation
5.4 Preliminary Conclusions
6The Merits of the Counterclaims
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Legitimacy and Inconsistent Decision-Making
6.3 Inconsistent Decision-Making in Arbitral Practice
6.4 Means of Overcoming Conflicting Interpretations
6.5 Assessing the Desirability of Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration
6.6 Preliminary Conclusions
7The ‘Magic’ of Counterclaims
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration
7.3 Wider Implications
7.4 Concluding Observations
Bibliography
Index
Abbreviations
Table of Treaties
Table of Cases
1Investment Arbitration and Counterclaims
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Foreign Investors, Investment Arbitration and International Law
1.3 Host State Courts
1.4 The Potential Role of Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration
1.5 Holding Foreign Investors Accountable for Breaches of International Law
2Jurisdiction over Counterclaims
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Consent to Investment Arbitration
2.3 Jurisdiction over Counterclaims
2.3.1icsid Convention and icsid Arbitration Rules
2.3.2icsid Additional Facility Arbitration Rules
2.3.3uncitral Arbitration Rules
2.3.4Analysis of Arbitral Practice
2.4 Recalibrating Consent to Counterclaims
2.5 Preliminary Conclusions
3The Nexus between Claims and Counterclaims
3.1 Introduction
3.2 The Good Administration of Justice and Counterclaims
3.3 The Nexus between Claims and Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration
3.3.1icsid Convention and icsid Arbitration Rules
3.3.2icsid Additional Facility Arbitration Rules
3.3.3uncitral Arbitration Rules
3.3.4Analysis of Arbitral Practice
3.4 Establishing the Nexus between a Claim and Counterclaim
3.5 Preliminary Conclusions
4Applicable Law and Counterclaims
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Determining the Applicable Law
4.3 Applicable Law and Arbitration Rules
4.3.1icsid Convention and icsid Arbitration Rules
4.3.2icsid Additional Facility Arbitration Rules
4.3.3uncitral Arbitration Rules
4.3.4Analysis of Arbitral Practice
4.4 Tailoring Applicable Law Provisions to Counterclaims
4.5 Preliminary Conclusions
5The Source of the Counterclaim
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Suitable Legal Obligations
5.2.1Treaty Law
5.2.2Customary International Law
5.2.3Jus Cogens
5.2.4Domestic Law
5.2.5Soft Law
5.3 The Desirable Characteristics of the Legal Obligation
5.4 Preliminary Conclusions
6The Merits of the Counterclaims
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Legitimacy and Inconsistent Decision-Making
6.3 Inconsistent Decision-Making in Arbitral Practice
6.4 Means of Overcoming Conflicting Interpretations
6.5 Assessing the Desirability of Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration
6.6 Preliminary Conclusions
7The ‘Magic’ of Counterclaims
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration
7.3 Wider Implications
7.4 Concluding Observations
Bibliography
Index