Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Deconstructing Imperial Representation: Tacitus, Cassius Dio, and Suetonius on Nero and Domitian: Mnemosyne, Supplements, cartea 427

Autor Verena Schulz
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 10 iul 2019
What literary strategies do Tacitus, Cassius Dio, and Suetonius apply in portraying Nero and Domitian? This book argues that the three authors respond to and deconstruct the positive accounts of imperial representation that were prevalent during the lifetimes of the two controversial emperors. They take up motifs from these earlier accounts, which they re-interpret to construct their own negative portraits.Although Tacitus, Cassius Dio, and Suetonius discuss the same historical figures and events of early imperial Rome, they are rarely examined together in one volume. Verena Schulz offers the first combined reading of their works from a philological viewpoint, analysing the various rhetorical techniques and narratological devices that they display, and the different literary and historical discourses in which they are embedded.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Mnemosyne, Supplements

Preț: 72906 lei

Preț vechi: 88910 lei
-18% Nou

Puncte Express: 1094

Preț estimativ în valută:
13953 14456$ 11644£

Carte indisponibilă temporar

Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9789004407213
ISBN-10: 9004407219
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill
Seria Mnemosyne, Supplements


Notă biografică

Verena Schulz is a Classical Philologist at the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. She has published a monograph (Die Stimme in der antiken Rhetorik, 2014), an edited volume, and many articles on Roman historiography and ancient rhetoric.

Recenzii

''S[chultz] sets out to show that a full understanding of Imperial obloquy entails a due appreciation of its relationship to Imperial praise. In this enterprise, she is successful. Students of all three authors, and both emperors, will find her analyses illuminating.'' - Luke Pitcher, in: Gnomon 94.2 (2022), pp. 119-122
“Zusammenfassend lässt sich konstatieren, dass Schulz vor allem durch die klare Darlegung ihrer Methodik ein inspirierendes Buch vorgelegt hat, das für Philologen und Historiker wertvoll sein dürfte. Doch ihr Beitrag beschränkt sich nicht allein auf methodische Ausdifferenzierungen, sondern auch inhaltlich hat sie einen Beitrag zum besseren Verständnis der Zeit von Nero bis Cassius Dio, seinem größten Kritiker, geleistet.” - Frank Ursin, in: Frankfurter elektronische Rundschau zur Altertumskunde 39 (2019)
''so hat Schulz mit ihrer Monographie etwas erreicht, was noch lange nicht jeder wissenschaftlichen Studie beschieden ist. Besonders überzeugen dabei die Passagen ihrer Untersuchung, in denen sie die unterschiedlichen Dekonstruktionsverfahren des Tacitus, Cassius Dio und Sueton anhand einzelner Episoden, die bei allen dreien überliefert sind, zueinander in Bezug setzt und dabei die Spezifika der jeweiligen Autoren herausarbeiten kann. Gerade dieser unmittelbare Vergleich zeigt eindrücklich den Wert einer narratologischen Betrachtung historiographischer Texte.'' - Isabelle Künzer, in: Plekos vol. 24 (2022), pp. 79-118

Cuprins

Preface
Introduction: Content and Purpose of This Study

Part 1 Constructing the Emperor in Historiography and Panegyric


1 Texts and Stories: on ‘Dinners with the Emperor’1An Example: Constructing Imperial Dinners2Ingredients for a Good Imperial Dinner3Critical Texts: Digesting Bad Dinners4Conclusions Drawn from This Case Study
2 Theory and History1Imperial Representation: Nero and Domitian2Discourse and Deconstruction3Literature and Persuasiveness

Part 2 Tacitus: Deconstruction and Uncertainty


Introduction
3 Imperial Representation and Topics of Deconstruction1Military Actions: from Peace to Inactivity, from Victory to Hypocrisy2Building Endeavours: from Construction to Destruction3Public Entertainment: from Popular to Eccentric Performances4Nero’s Speeches: Gaining Rhetorical Power5Divinity: from God-Like to Unhuman6Atmosphere: From Golden Age to the Dynamics of Bad Times
4 Strategies of Deconstruction in Tacitus1Overview: How to Deconstruct Imperial Representation2Negative Connotations: ‘Facts’, Additions, and Foils3Causation and Character4New Forms of Logic
5 Creating Uncertainty1Tacitus and Theories of Uncertainty2Playing with Variants3Playing with Oppositions4Uncertainty and Interpretation
Conclusion

Part 3 Cassius Dio: Deconstruction and Typologies


Introduction
6 Writing Historiography under the Severans1The Roman History and the Early Third Century2Imperial Representation in the Roman History
7 Strategies of Deconstruction in Cassius Dio1Negative Connotations2Persuasive Characters3The Rhetoric of Combination4Selection and Focus5Spoiling the Atmosphere
8 Deconstruction and the Construction of Memory1Typologies of Bad Emperors2Hot Memory: Why Nero and Domitian?3Genealogies versus Typologies
Conclusion

Part 4 Suetonius: Deconstruction and Entertainment


Introduction
9 Biography and Eccentric Representation1Structure and Criticism: Current Debates on Suetonius2Rubrics and Representation: Fragmentation and Re-Contextualization
10 Strategies of Deconstruction in Suetonius1Historiographical Techniques in Imperial Biographies2Suetonian Techniques: the Effect of Rubrics3Ambivalent Techniques and a Weaker Form of Deconstruction
11 Deconstructed Elements and Miscellanism1Beyond Tacitus and Cassius Dio: Suetonian Deconstruction and the Historiographical Discourse2Between Pliny the Elder and Aulus Gellius: Suetonian Deconstruction and the Non-Historiographical Discourse
Conclusion

Part 5 Conclusion


Conclusion: Three Modes of Deconstruction
Appendix: Deconstruction and Rhetorical StrategiesBibliographyIndex