Deconstructing Self-Determination in International Law: Sovereignty, Exception, and Biopolitics: Developments in International Law, cartea 78
Autor Przemysław Taciken Limba Engleză Hardback – 25 iul 2023
Din seria Developments in International Law
- Preț: 390.74 lei
- 15% Preț: 627.51 lei
- 18% Preț: 1312.42 lei
- 18% Preț: 1058.00 lei
- 18% Preț: 1267.79 lei
- 18% Preț: 1269.57 lei
- 18% Preț: 794.82 lei
- 18% Preț: 1001.71 lei
- 15% Preț: 352.20 lei
- 18% Preț: 674.76 lei
- 18% Preț: 700.59 lei
- 18% Preț: 703.94 lei
- 18% Preț: 1204.99 lei
- 18% Preț: 879.06 lei
- 18% Preț: 1210.58 lei
- 18% Preț: 780.16 lei
- 18% Preț: 636.27 lei
- 18% Preț: 904.01 lei
- 18% Preț: 793.30 lei
- 18% Preț: 957.99 lei
- 18% Preț: 1177.96 lei
- 18% Preț: 795.99 lei
- 18% Preț: 746.90 lei
- 18% Preț: 1716.52 lei
- 18% Preț: 834.97 lei
- 18% Preț: 819.57 lei
- 18% Preț: 736.37 lei
- 18% Preț: 613.67 lei
- 18% Preț: 775.74 lei
- 18% Preț: 651.77 lei
- 18% Preț: 575.27 lei
- 18% Preț: 807.28 lei
- 18% Preț: 703.53 lei
- 18% Preț: 763.68 lei
- 18% Preț: 688.99 lei
- 18% Preț: 1258.04 lei
- 18% Preț: 862.54 lei
- 18% Preț: 639.18 lei
Preț: 838.45 lei
Preț vechi: 1022.49 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 1258
Preț estimativ în valută:
160.51€ • 166.85$ • 133.08£
160.51€ • 166.85$ • 133.08£
Carte indisponibilă temporar
Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:
Se trimite...
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9789004541139
ISBN-10: 9004541136
Pagini: 550
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria Developments in International Law
ISBN-10: 9004541136
Pagini: 550
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria Developments in International Law
Notă biografică
Przemysław Tacik, Dr. phil. (2014), Dr. iur (2016), Jagiellonian University in Kraków, is Assistant Professor at that university and Director of Nomos: Centre for International Research on Law, Culture and Power. He has published extensively on law and philosophy, including A New Philosophy of Modernity and Sovereignty. Towards Radical Historicisation (Bloomsbury 2021).
Cuprins
Acknowledgements
Introduction
iIt Is What It Is Not: Introductory Critical Perspectives on the Right of Self-determination of Peoples
i.1 What Can Critical Legal Theory Bring to the Study of Self-determination?
i.1.1Plaidoyer for Theory in International Law
i.1.2Critical Legal Thinking as a Paradigm for International Law
i.1.3Critical Legal Thinking and Self-Determination of Peoples
i.2 Critique of Opening Gestures vis-à-vis Self-Determination
i.2.1The Conceptual Vastness of Self-Determination
i.2.2How Could an Internally Contradictory Right Be Effective?
i.2.3Strategies of Defining
i.3 Right to Self-Determination of Nations as a State of Exception within International Law
i.3.1Agambenian State of Exception: Suspension at the Heart of the Law
i.3.2The Right of Nations to Self-Determination as the State of Exception in International Law: Theoretical Outline
i.3.3The Right of Nations to Self-Determination as the State of Exception in International Law: Beyond Agamben
i.4 War and Spiral: Two Symptomal Lectures
i.4.1War and Self-Determination
i.4.2The Spiral of Self-Determination
i.5 The Self-Determination Triangle: Nation, Sovereignty, International Law
i.5.1The rsd as a Suture between the Domestic and the International
i.5.2The Biopolitical Underside of National Self-determination
i.5.3Ideologies of Secession
i.6 Conclusions
iiA Critical Genealogy of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination
ii.1 Histories of Self-Determination: against Continuity
ii.2 Revelation of a Conceptual Knot: from 18th to the First World War
ii.2.1The American and the French Revolutions: a Release of Self-Determination Force
ii.2.2The Simmering Pot: on the Way to Self-Determination
ii.2.3The Theory of Marxism and Self-Determination
ii.3 Yes, but … Self-Determination as a Trap and a Misunderstanding: 1914–1945
ii.3.1The Practice of Marxism and Self-Determination
ii.3.2The Wilsonian Version
ii.3.3Self-Determination in the Interwar
ii.4 This Time Properly? Self-Determination in the Cold War
ii.4.1The UN Charter
ii.4.2The Golden Era of Self-Determination as Decolonisation
ii.4.3The Classic Corpus of icj Jurisprudence on Self-Determination
ii.4.4Paradoxes of Decolonisation
ii.5 Liberal Reconfiguration: 1989–2008
ii.5.1Self-Determination under Reconstruction
ii.5.2The Post-socialist Wave of Self-Determination
ii.5.3Theory and Practice of Self-Determination in the Liberal Era
ii.6 Confusion of Post-liberal Times: Revelation of an Aporia
ii.6.1The Kosovo Case: Hiatus of Self-Determination Revealed
ii.6.2The Post-Kosovo Conondrum
ii.7 Conclusions: Historical Incoherence of Self-Determination
iiiSelf-Determination between Legal Fictions and Reality
iii.1 The Nation, the People, the Void
iii.2 What Self Is Determining?
iii.3 The Gentle Art of Suturing: Nations, States and uti possidetis
iii.4 The Legal Status of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination
iii.4.1Right and/or Principle
iii.4.2Content and Status
ivThe Right to Self-Determination as a State of Exception in International Law
iv.1 The Content of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination
iv.1.1External versus Internal Self-Determination: Tales of a False Symmetry
iv.1.2The Pale Scare: Secession as a Form of Self-Determination
iv.1.3An Ideal for Daylight: General Right to Secession
iv.1.4The Crowning Exception: Remedial Secession
iv.1.5Inconspicuously Constructed Normality: Internal Self-Determination and Its Corollaries
iv.1.6Conclusions: Secession and the Non-applicability of the Right to Self-Determination
iv.2 Governance of the Exception: Enforceability of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination
iv.2.1Paradoxes of rsd’s Enforceability
iv.2.2Before ‘Exercising’ the rsd: Fight in the Extra-legal Zone
iv.2.3After ‘Exercising’ the rsd: Recognition as Governance
iv.3 A Special Case of a Special Right: the rsd of Indigenous Peoples
iv.3.1The Exceptional Position of Indigenous Peoples
iv.3.2Self-Determination of Indigenous Peoples
vParadoxes of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination: a Critical Reappraisal
v.1 Popular Sovereignty v. State Sovereignty
v.2 Nationalism v. International Law
v.3 Self-Determination v. Territorial Integrity
v.4 Domestic Law v. Secession
v.5 Self-Determination: Law v. Fact
v.6 Self-Determination v. The Right to Democratic Governance
v.7 Self-Determination v. Representative Government: the Meaning of People’s Consent
v.8 Individual v. Collective Rights of Self-Determination
v.9Creatio Continua: Is Self-Determination Perpetual or One-Off?
Conclusions
Bibliography
Index
Introduction
iIt Is What It Is Not: Introductory Critical Perspectives on the Right of Self-determination of Peoples
i.1 What Can Critical Legal Theory Bring to the Study of Self-determination?
i.1.1Plaidoyer for Theory in International Law
i.1.2Critical Legal Thinking as a Paradigm for International Law
i.1.3Critical Legal Thinking and Self-Determination of Peoples
i.2 Critique of Opening Gestures vis-à-vis Self-Determination
i.2.1The Conceptual Vastness of Self-Determination
i.2.2How Could an Internally Contradictory Right Be Effective?
i.2.3Strategies of Defining
i.3 Right to Self-Determination of Nations as a State of Exception within International Law
i.3.1Agambenian State of Exception: Suspension at the Heart of the Law
i.3.2The Right of Nations to Self-Determination as the State of Exception in International Law: Theoretical Outline
i.3.3The Right of Nations to Self-Determination as the State of Exception in International Law: Beyond Agamben
i.4 War and Spiral: Two Symptomal Lectures
i.4.1War and Self-Determination
i.4.2The Spiral of Self-Determination
i.5 The Self-Determination Triangle: Nation, Sovereignty, International Law
i.5.1The rsd as a Suture between the Domestic and the International
i.5.2The Biopolitical Underside of National Self-determination
i.5.3Ideologies of Secession
i.6 Conclusions
iiA Critical Genealogy of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination
ii.1 Histories of Self-Determination: against Continuity
ii.2 Revelation of a Conceptual Knot: from 18th to the First World War
ii.2.1The American and the French Revolutions: a Release of Self-Determination Force
ii.2.2The Simmering Pot: on the Way to Self-Determination
ii.2.3The Theory of Marxism and Self-Determination
ii.3 Yes, but … Self-Determination as a Trap and a Misunderstanding: 1914–1945
ii.3.1The Practice of Marxism and Self-Determination
ii.3.2The Wilsonian Version
ii.3.3Self-Determination in the Interwar
ii.4 This Time Properly? Self-Determination in the Cold War
ii.4.1The UN Charter
ii.4.2The Golden Era of Self-Determination as Decolonisation
ii.4.3The Classic Corpus of icj Jurisprudence on Self-Determination
ii.4.4Paradoxes of Decolonisation
ii.5 Liberal Reconfiguration: 1989–2008
ii.5.1Self-Determination under Reconstruction
ii.5.2The Post-socialist Wave of Self-Determination
ii.5.3Theory and Practice of Self-Determination in the Liberal Era
ii.6 Confusion of Post-liberal Times: Revelation of an Aporia
ii.6.1The Kosovo Case: Hiatus of Self-Determination Revealed
ii.6.2The Post-Kosovo Conondrum
ii.7 Conclusions: Historical Incoherence of Self-Determination
iiiSelf-Determination between Legal Fictions and Reality
iii.1 The Nation, the People, the Void
iii.2 What Self Is Determining?
iii.3 The Gentle Art of Suturing: Nations, States and uti possidetis
iii.4 The Legal Status of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination
iii.4.1Right and/or Principle
iii.4.2Content and Status
ivThe Right to Self-Determination as a State of Exception in International Law
iv.1 The Content of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination
iv.1.1External versus Internal Self-Determination: Tales of a False Symmetry
iv.1.2The Pale Scare: Secession as a Form of Self-Determination
iv.1.3An Ideal for Daylight: General Right to Secession
iv.1.4The Crowning Exception: Remedial Secession
iv.1.5Inconspicuously Constructed Normality: Internal Self-Determination and Its Corollaries
iv.1.6Conclusions: Secession and the Non-applicability of the Right to Self-Determination
iv.2 Governance of the Exception: Enforceability of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination
iv.2.1Paradoxes of rsd’s Enforceability
iv.2.2Before ‘Exercising’ the rsd: Fight in the Extra-legal Zone
iv.2.3After ‘Exercising’ the rsd: Recognition as Governance
iv.3 A Special Case of a Special Right: the rsd of Indigenous Peoples
iv.3.1The Exceptional Position of Indigenous Peoples
iv.3.2Self-Determination of Indigenous Peoples
vParadoxes of the Right of Nations to Self-Determination: a Critical Reappraisal
v.1 Popular Sovereignty v. State Sovereignty
v.2 Nationalism v. International Law
v.3 Self-Determination v. Territorial Integrity
v.4 Domestic Law v. Secession
v.5 Self-Determination: Law v. Fact
v.6 Self-Determination v. The Right to Democratic Governance
v.7 Self-Determination v. Representative Government: the Meaning of People’s Consent
v.8 Individual v. Collective Rights of Self-Determination
v.9Creatio Continua: Is Self-Determination Perpetual or One-Off?
Conclusions
Bibliography
Index