Delivery as Dispossession: Land Occupation and Eviction in the Postapartheid City: Global and Comparative Ethnography
Autor Zachary Levensonen Limba Engleză Paperback – 8 iul 2022
Preț: 170.43 lei
Preț vechi: 207.72 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 256
Preț estimativ în valută:
32.62€ • 33.91$ • 27.02£
32.62€ • 33.91$ • 27.02£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 03-09 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780197629253
ISBN-10: 0197629253
Pagini: 296
Ilustrații: 8 b/w halftones, 2 maps
Dimensiuni: 224 x 150 x 20 mm
Greutate: 0.41 kg
Editura: Oxford University Press
Colecția OUP USA
Seria Global and Comparative Ethnography
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 0197629253
Pagini: 296
Ilustrații: 8 b/w halftones, 2 maps
Dimensiuni: 224 x 150 x 20 mm
Greutate: 0.41 kg
Editura: Oxford University Press
Colecția OUP USA
Seria Global and Comparative Ethnography
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Recenzii
Impressively clear and compelling....Levenson demonstrates the classic sociological combination of ethnographic rigor and theoretical innovation. This is ethnography at its best.
The book's narrative account of the events he examined is powerful, the research is vigorous and rigorous, and his findings are important and generalizable, all of which testifies to the utility of the theoretical tools he used to conduct this study. Overall, Levenson's argument is cogent, nuanced, and well-supported by his evidence. He also does impressively well at threading the needle of generalizing about the significance of his research findings and specifying the particularity of the people and events he engaged in a concrete time and place.
This pathbreaking study of the contrasting dynamics of self-organization in two Cape squatter communities opens exciting new windows in social theory. Levenson, in a close re-reading of Gramsci, challenges simplistic dichotomies between 'civil society' and the state, focusing instead on the dialectics of their interaction in collective struggles for housing rights. Post-apartheid South Africa formally recognizes the right to decent shelter but has failed to deliver on the promise of massive new home construction for Apartheid's victims. In the resulting environment of acute scarcity, informal settlements compete with another to articulate their demands within political space-a competition in which a crucial resource for success is the ability of squatters to achieve organic unity as 'fused groups." -Mike Davis, author of Planet of Slums
Critically departing from the prevailing perspectives on land occupation and eviction in South Africa--such as visibility, gentrification, and public-private property type--Levenson offers a fresh and powerful outlook by bringing the state and civil society into an integral explanatory frame. He shows that the dynamics of land occupation and eviction is shaped by how the poor and the state view each other's practices. This is a lucid and engaging book informed by extensive on-the-ground research.
A beautifully written book about a heart-wrenching social problem: how can the ANC government, whose legitimacy rests on its promise to provide housing for all, use the logic of 'legitimate government' to regularly dispossess its citizens? This rigorously researched ethnography provides a rare glimpse into the logic of evictions in post-Apartheid South Africa. The text provides a kaleidoscopic view into the problem by showing us not only how government actors see residents but also how residents see the state. Thus, we get a rare glimpse into the way in which dispossessed communities frame and advance their claims, how these claims are seen and understood, and the complex interplay of factors that determine which communities successfully defend their rights and which the state feels authorized to deny. This highly readable and tightly argued book is a 'must read' for ethnographers and social theorists alike." -Zine Magubane, Professor of Sociology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill MA
A convincing, wonderfully grounded argument that demonstrates that political practice matters.
Drawing attention to the intricacies of land occupation, Levenson's immensely readable book opens a field for much-needed enquiry, grounded research, theorisation, debate and ultimately political conscientisation.
Delivery as Dispossession is an impressive achievement, drawing together empirical rigor, theoretical innovation, and a compelling story about surplus populations. It will be of great interest and value to scholars and teachers interested in urban sociology, political sociolgy,and the sociologies of development, race and social movements.
Delivery as Dispossession: Land Occupation and Eviction in the Postapartheid City is a good book. It combines a strong theoretical argument with a deeply researched empirical foundation.
One cannot do justice to the intricate details of Levenson's complex argument in a few short pages. Suffice it to say that Levenson uses his theoretical toolbox to construct a comparison of divergent outcomes. Levenson uses this comparative methodological approach to challenge deductive theorizing and its tendency to select on the dependent variable. Scholars like Howard Kimeldorf, Mark Traugott, and Jay MacLeod produced really good comparative analysis. I would add Levenson to this rarefied list.
In this creative and critical work, Levenson offers us a challenge to move beyond prior understandings of the drivers of eviction to consider a more relational perspective.
Delivery as Dispossession by Zach Levenson is a brilliant analysis of the politics of subjection in postcolonial democracy, showing how the ruse of housing exacts obedience, and at best, delivers permanent temporariness.
[Levenson] has gifted us with a brilliant book that should be engaged by anyone concerned with everyday struggles for survival in the city, land occupations, and the dialectical relationship between movements, non-movements, and the integral state.
Throughout the analysis, including the presentation of his rich ethnographic material and his careful theoretical readings, particularly of Gramsci, Levenson productively unsettles conventional conceptualizations of the state, social movements, and civil society. Given the rich insights it provides, I expect this book to be widely read and debated by ethnographers, sociologists, and interdisciplinary scholars working with these concepts. And going forward, I expect that scholars working on the bourgeois state and civil society will have to engage with and respond to these insightful reformulations.
The book's narrative account of the events he examined is powerful, the research is vigorous and rigorous, and his findings are important and generalizable, all of which testifies to the utility of the theoretical tools he used to conduct this study. Overall, Levenson's argument is cogent, nuanced, and well-supported by his evidence. He also does impressively well at threading the needle of generalizing about the significance of his research findings and specifying the particularity of the people and events he engaged in a concrete time and place.
This pathbreaking study of the contrasting dynamics of self-organization in two Cape squatter communities opens exciting new windows in social theory. Levenson, in a close re-reading of Gramsci, challenges simplistic dichotomies between 'civil society' and the state, focusing instead on the dialectics of their interaction in collective struggles for housing rights. Post-apartheid South Africa formally recognizes the right to decent shelter but has failed to deliver on the promise of massive new home construction for Apartheid's victims. In the resulting environment of acute scarcity, informal settlements compete with another to articulate their demands within political space-a competition in which a crucial resource for success is the ability of squatters to achieve organic unity as 'fused groups." -Mike Davis, author of Planet of Slums
Critically departing from the prevailing perspectives on land occupation and eviction in South Africa--such as visibility, gentrification, and public-private property type--Levenson offers a fresh and powerful outlook by bringing the state and civil society into an integral explanatory frame. He shows that the dynamics of land occupation and eviction is shaped by how the poor and the state view each other's practices. This is a lucid and engaging book informed by extensive on-the-ground research.
A beautifully written book about a heart-wrenching social problem: how can the ANC government, whose legitimacy rests on its promise to provide housing for all, use the logic of 'legitimate government' to regularly dispossess its citizens? This rigorously researched ethnography provides a rare glimpse into the logic of evictions in post-Apartheid South Africa. The text provides a kaleidoscopic view into the problem by showing us not only how government actors see residents but also how residents see the state. Thus, we get a rare glimpse into the way in which dispossessed communities frame and advance their claims, how these claims are seen and understood, and the complex interplay of factors that determine which communities successfully defend their rights and which the state feels authorized to deny. This highly readable and tightly argued book is a 'must read' for ethnographers and social theorists alike." -Zine Magubane, Professor of Sociology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill MA
A convincing, wonderfully grounded argument that demonstrates that political practice matters.
Drawing attention to the intricacies of land occupation, Levenson's immensely readable book opens a field for much-needed enquiry, grounded research, theorisation, debate and ultimately political conscientisation.
Delivery as Dispossession is an impressive achievement, drawing together empirical rigor, theoretical innovation, and a compelling story about surplus populations. It will be of great interest and value to scholars and teachers interested in urban sociology, political sociolgy,and the sociologies of development, race and social movements.
Delivery as Dispossession: Land Occupation and Eviction in the Postapartheid City is a good book. It combines a strong theoretical argument with a deeply researched empirical foundation.
One cannot do justice to the intricate details of Levenson's complex argument in a few short pages. Suffice it to say that Levenson uses his theoretical toolbox to construct a comparison of divergent outcomes. Levenson uses this comparative methodological approach to challenge deductive theorizing and its tendency to select on the dependent variable. Scholars like Howard Kimeldorf, Mark Traugott, and Jay MacLeod produced really good comparative analysis. I would add Levenson to this rarefied list.
In this creative and critical work, Levenson offers us a challenge to move beyond prior understandings of the drivers of eviction to consider a more relational perspective.
Delivery as Dispossession by Zach Levenson is a brilliant analysis of the politics of subjection in postcolonial democracy, showing how the ruse of housing exacts obedience, and at best, delivers permanent temporariness.
[Levenson] has gifted us with a brilliant book that should be engaged by anyone concerned with everyday struggles for survival in the city, land occupations, and the dialectical relationship between movements, non-movements, and the integral state.
Throughout the analysis, including the presentation of his rich ethnographic material and his careful theoretical readings, particularly of Gramsci, Levenson productively unsettles conventional conceptualizations of the state, social movements, and civil society. Given the rich insights it provides, I expect this book to be widely read and debated by ethnographers, sociologists, and interdisciplinary scholars working with these concepts. And going forward, I expect that scholars working on the bourgeois state and civil society will have to engage with and respond to these insightful reformulations.
Notă biografică
Zachary Levenson is Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of North Carolina, Greensboro, and a Senior Research Associate at the University of Johannesburg. His work, which combines political and urban sociology, has appeared in Qualitative Sociology, Urban Studies, the Journal of Agrarian Change, and International Sociology, among other venues.