Grant and Lee: Victorious American and Vanquished Virginian
Autor Edward H. Bonekemper IIIen Limba Engleză Hardback – 29 dec 2007 – vârsta până la 17 ani
Preț: 329.04 lei
Preț vechi: 374.61 lei
-12% Nou
Puncte Express: 494
Preț estimativ în valută:
62.99€ • 65.48$ • 52.23£
62.99€ • 65.48$ • 52.23£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 06-20 februarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780313349713
ISBN-10: 0313349711
Pagini: 460
Dimensiuni: 156 x 235 x 41 mm
Greutate: 0.86 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Praeger
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 0313349711
Pagini: 460
Dimensiuni: 156 x 235 x 41 mm
Greutate: 0.86 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Praeger
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Notă biografică
Edward H. Bonekemper, lII is an adjunct lecturer of U.S. military history at Muhlenberg College. For over 34 years he served as a Federal Government attorney , including 11 years of active duty with the U.S. Coast Guard and 17 as the senior hazardous materials transportation attorney for the U.S. Department of Transportation. He is a retired commander in the U.S. Coast Guard Reserve. He is the author of How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War (1998), A Victor, Not a Butcher: Ulysses S. Grant's Overlooked Military Genius (2004), and McClellan and Failure: A Study of Civil War Fear, Incompetence and Worse (2007).
Cuprins
List of MapsPrefaceIntroduction: Why Grant Won and Lee Lost1. Tough Beginnings and Mexican War Experience2. 1861: Open and Closed Doors to Civil War Command3. Late 1861 / Early 1862: Lee's First Loss and Grant's Early Victories4. March-June 1862: Grant Wins at Shiloh While Lee Stymies McClellan5. 1862-63: Lee Conducts a Costly Offensive While Grant Aims for Vicksburg6. May-July 1863: Lee Loses Gettysburg as Grant Captures Vicksburg7. Autumn 1863: Lee Lends an Assist as Grant Saves Chattanooga and a Union Army8. Early 1864: Both Generals Prepare for Confrontation9. Spring 1864: Grant Attacks and Besieges Lee10. Late 1864: Grant and Sherman Move Toward Victory11. Early 1865: Lee Surrenders to Grant12. A Comparison of Grant and LeeAppendix 1: Casualties in Grant's Battles and CampaignsAppendix 2: Casualties in Lee's Battles and CampaignsNotesSelected BibliographyIndex
Recenzii
This careful, thoughtful examination of the wartime careers of Generals Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee is a testimonial to a scholar at the height of his powers. In this brilliant extension of his 2004 book on the generalship of Grant (A Victor, Not a Butcher, CH, May'05, 42-5456), Bonekemper convincingly demolishes the long-held belief by many writers that Grant was a butcher of men, that he carelessly and heartlessly threw away his soldiers in an almost mindless series of battles from Shiloh to his relentless campaign against Lee's Army of Northern Virginia in the closing months of war. The author carefully examines the campaigns of both men, looking at casualty rates and results, and provides a clear context for his observations. Both men were aggressive, but Lee's narrow vision of the war and reckless expenditure of men made him the real butcher and ultimately cost the South any hope of victory. The last chapter comparing the strengths and weaknesses of Grant and Lee is alone worth the price of the book. A remarkable addition to the literature on the Civil War that will endure for years to come. Essential. All levels/libraries.
For those interested in Ulysses S. Grant or Robert E. Lee (and really, what Civil War addict isn't?), this book is a must read. Bonekemper convincingly demonstrates that Grant was the better general and has conducted some ground breaking analyses of Lee's performance..This is a very well thought-out work.
[A] remarkably concise and coherent narrative of the war that sweeps aside the irrelevancies and focuses on the campaigns that decided the war.
A surprisingly interesting new perspective to the ever-burgeoning scholarship on these Civil War icons..this rigorously researched book will serve as a useful launching point for intellectual discussion regarding the legacies of these legendary commanders.
Bonekemper has pulled together an impressive narrative. He writes easily and readers will no doubt enjoy his barbed analysis throughout.
To his credit, Bonekemper cites a number of prominent historians to lend credence to the various schools surrounding the merits of Grant's and Lee's generalship. Readers will find the detailed appendices and notes well worth the cost of the book. Two appendices specifically address conflicting casualty rates in every major battle and campaign fought by Grant and Lee. In addition, superior maps throughout the text add to the readers compension of the various campaigns.
. . . this most recent work is the strongest of his previous three. He has sharpened his controversial argument to a fine point. Passionately and accurately, he makes point after point in favor of his notion that Grant was the superior strategist . . . This work is sure to rile the most ardent supporters of Robert E. Lee, but it is a worthwhile read. The book not only provides new perspectives on the two generals as adversaries, it also makes the reader think and rethink about his perceptions of the two generals. . . . Bonekemper's book is filled with excellent maps that reinforce what the reader is focusing on. . . . The author doesn't just dangle a carrot and expect the reader to know every detail. The chapters are well-written and analytical. . . . If you give Grant and Lee a fair chance, I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. If for nothing else, the book is a great, thought-provoking conversation piece for any Civil War buff.
For those interested in Ulysses S. Grant or Robert E. Lee (and really, what Civil War addict isn't?), this book is a must read. Bonekemper convincingly demonstrates that Grant was the better general and has conducted some ground breaking analyses of Lee's performance..This is a very well thought-out work.
[A] remarkably concise and coherent narrative of the war that sweeps aside the irrelevancies and focuses on the campaigns that decided the war.
A surprisingly interesting new perspective to the ever-burgeoning scholarship on these Civil War icons..this rigorously researched book will serve as a useful launching point for intellectual discussion regarding the legacies of these legendary commanders.
Bonekemper has pulled together an impressive narrative. He writes easily and readers will no doubt enjoy his barbed analysis throughout.
To his credit, Bonekemper cites a number of prominent historians to lend credence to the various schools surrounding the merits of Grant's and Lee's generalship. Readers will find the detailed appendices and notes well worth the cost of the book. Two appendices specifically address conflicting casualty rates in every major battle and campaign fought by Grant and Lee. In addition, superior maps throughout the text add to the readers compension of the various campaigns.
. . . this most recent work is the strongest of his previous three. He has sharpened his controversial argument to a fine point. Passionately and accurately, he makes point after point in favor of his notion that Grant was the superior strategist . . . This work is sure to rile the most ardent supporters of Robert E. Lee, but it is a worthwhile read. The book not only provides new perspectives on the two generals as adversaries, it also makes the reader think and rethink about his perceptions of the two generals. . . . Bonekemper's book is filled with excellent maps that reinforce what the reader is focusing on. . . . The author doesn't just dangle a carrot and expect the reader to know every detail. The chapters are well-written and analytical. . . . If you give Grant and Lee a fair chance, I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. If for nothing else, the book is a great, thought-provoking conversation piece for any Civil War buff.