This past twenty years plus saw me go without any income as I tried to get my theorem recognised as well as get my warning noted. Going without a steady income left me almost destitute and in order to find a manner to get my theory across to the attention of influential readers, I decided to publish a theses of 8 books electronically as to try and get around the stranglehold of Newtonian bias controlling science at present worldwide. I always submit articles to well known physics magazines but my articles are rejected on the most unappeasable grounds and for the most outrageously ridiculous reasons the Newtonians can think of. I explain how gravity forms but I am rejected because they are of the opinion that my work does not meet an acceptable level of standard since I am at odds with the way science in the present think about gravity. According to the Big Bang principle everything is growing and moving "further apart" and therefore there is no "mass" pulling anything closer according to "body mass" because nothing has "body mass". But my views are rejected because my views clash with the wisdom of the Masters forming the principles that direct the thinking of science in science according to science. If you want to read how corrupt the thinking is in science then read on but do so with the sole purpose to prove me wrong. I would love it if someone proves me wrong but not with shitty idiotic arguments such as who am I to say the Honourable men forming science can be wrong Proving my statements wrong is one thing not one of the Masters forming the principles that direct the thinking of science in science according to science carrying all the wisdom they can manage could ever do In the books on offer through this web page and in which I am introducing a totally new concept in terms of gravity, the proof I bring is true about gravity being formed as a result of these following phenomena. In the past science hardly recognised the existence of such phenomena although they are known to science for centuries. 1) The Lagrangian system 2) The Roche limit 3) The Titius Bode law 4) The Coanda affect. I found the manner in which to interpret Kepler's formula as a3 = kT2 and I found that when dealing with Kepler's formula, we should not see a3 as space but we should see singularity being positioned in space in relation to singularity forming relevancies. Doing that placed me in the position to discover what gravity is and how gravity operates to form the Universe. By placing P in relation to gravity I manage to find an explanation for the four cosmic phenomena. Everything that has anything to do with gravity forms a circle albeit that it is called the curvature of space-time or gravity bending light or forming a round galactica, the connecting factor is gravity which implements P. Gravity or another name used to call gravity would be time is running on the measure of P and every aspect of cosmology integrates P as the basic concept on which cosmology is founded. Because my views do not echo the commendable praise attributed to the greatness by which Newton is commemorated, my work is purposely and very much wilfully poorly received in the world of physics and astrophysics and by that I find very little willingness in any understanding shown in the ranks of Newtonian science. This work contains ideas about the introducing of a totally new concept on explaining for the first time ever the working principles of gravity, a matter that eluded Newton no less. I decided to offer four books that introduce the explaining of these concepts in e-book format. I tried to introduce the four phenomena as a concept by using a web page but found such introduction is far too comprehensive in having numerously wide ranging facts that form the complete picture and therefore on account of that realisation that I was unable to include an introduction in a space as small as that a web page will allow, I got the idea of using electronic publishing.