Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Historical Evidence and Argument

Autor David Henige
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 18 sep 2005
Historians know about the past because they examine the evidence. But what exactly is “evidence,” how do historians know what it means—and how can we trust them to get it right? Historian David Henige tackles such questions of historical reliability head-on in his skeptical, unsparing, and acerbically witty Historical Evidence and Argument. “Systematic doubt” is his watchword, and he practices what he preaches through a variety of insightful assessments of historical controversies—for example, over the dating of artifacts and the textual analysis of translated documents. Skepticism, Henige contends, forces us to recognize the limits of our knowledge, but is also a positive force that stimulates new scholarship to counter it.
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 18542 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 278

Preț estimativ în valută:
3550 3662$ 2943£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 20 februarie-06 martie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780299214104
ISBN-10: 0299214109
Pagini: 340
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 23 mm
Greutate: 0.65 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: University of Wisconsin Press
Colecția University of Wisconsin Press

Recenzii

“Henige takes the study of historical methodology to a new level.”—David C. Conrad, State University of New York–Oswego
“There is no other book like this one in its breadth and scope. . . . A deftly acerbic series of sketches of the many ways that historians misread and misuse evidence.”—Eric Gable, Mary Washington College

Notă biografică

David Henige is the African studies bibliographer at the University of Wisconsin–Madison and editor of several national series on African history.

Descriere

Historians know about the past because they examine the evidence. But what exactly is “evidence,” how do historians know what it means—and how can we trust them to get it right? Historian David Henige tackles such questions of historical reliability head-on in his skeptical, unsparing, and acerbically witty Historical Evidence and Argument. “Systematic doubt” is his watchword, and he practices what he preaches through a variety of insightful assessments of historical controversies—for example, over the dating of artifacts and the textual analysis of translated documents. Skepticism, Henige contends, forces us to recognize the limits of our knowledge, but is also a positive force that stimulates new scholarship to counter it.