Improving the Regulatory Review Process: Assessing Performance and Setting Targets: CMR Workshop
Autor McAuslane, J. A. Neil McAuslane, Cmr International Workshopen Limba Engleză Hardback – 31 dec 1997
Preț: 628.77 lei
Preț vechi: 661.87 lei
-5% Nou
Puncte Express: 943
Preț estimativ în valută:
120.35€ • 125.43$ • 100.18£
120.35€ • 125.43$ • 100.18£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 06-20 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780792387312
ISBN-10: 0792387317
Pagini: 163
Dimensiuni: 160 x 240 mm
Greutate: 0.44 kg
Editura: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Seria CMR Workshop
Locul publicării:Dordrecht, Netherlands
ISBN-10: 0792387317
Pagini: 163
Dimensiuni: 160 x 240 mm
Greutate: 0.44 kg
Editura: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Seria CMR Workshop
Locul publicării:Dordrecht, Netherlands
Public țintă
ResearchCuprins
Preface. Foreword. 1. Assessing Performance and Setting Targets; T. Eaves. 2. Current Regulatory Reforms and Improvements in the Review Process; F. Sauer. 3. Establishing Performance Targets for the Review Process: The View of the FDA; M. Lumpkin. 4. Current Regulatory Reforms: CBER; K. Zoon. 5. Improving the Review Process: The View of the Japanese MHW; Y. Hirayama. 6. Comparing the Performance of the Canadian Therapeutic Products Directorate with Other Regulatory Authorities; B. Pieterson. 7. Measuring Performance: The View of the TGA; J. McEwen. 8. Why Have Targets for the Review Process? The View of the EMEA; R. Bass. 9. Why Have Targets for the Review Process? The European View of a Pharmaceutical Industry Individual; E. Donnelly. 10. Key Milestones in the Regulatory Review Process? The View of the European Pharmaceutical Industry; K. Thomas. 11. How do You Measure the Quality of the Scientific Assessment and the Process? The View of the MCA; D. Jefferys. 12. Ensuring the Quality of the Scientific Assessment and the Review Process: The FDA's Good Review Practice Initiative; M. Lumpkin. 13. Recommendations for the Syndicate Sessions: Define Mutually Agreeable Measures and Targets for the Review Process for Authorising NMEs and Abridged Applications; V. Silano, et al. 14. Recommendations for Syndicate Sessions: What Are the Appropriate Measures of the Quality of the Review; M. Lumpkin, et al. Index.