In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings
Autor Matthew H. Krameren Limba Engleză Paperback – 19 mar 2003
Preț: 320.21 lei
Preț vechi: 394.62 lei
-19% Nou
Puncte Express: 480
Preț estimativ în valută:
61.28€ • 64.65$ • 51.07£
61.28€ • 64.65$ • 51.07£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 23-30 decembrie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780199264834
ISBN-10: 019926483X
Pagini: 324
Dimensiuni: 156 x 235 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.48 kg
Editura: OUP OXFORD
Colecția OUP Oxford
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 019926483X
Pagini: 324
Dimensiuni: 156 x 235 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.48 kg
Editura: OUP OXFORD
Colecția OUP Oxford
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Recenzii
Review from previous edition Kramer's analysis is detailed, thoroughgoing and comprehensive. He lays bare the fundamental disagreements between positivist and anti-positivist theorists, and in the process promotes a richer understanding of the view he seeks to defend.
Matthew Kramer, with characteristic vigour and analytical force, presents a staunch defense of positivism against many popular forms of idealism and rejects many of the concessions that positivism has made to idealism....Kramer's defence of legal positivism is a powerful synthesis of the ideas of some of the most well-known expositors of the doctrine.Whilst his general approach is negative -- in that he attempts to provide rebuttals to many of the more popular idealist attacks on positivism -- he does present a positive thesis, and it is on this that attention is focused. His positive argument skilfully combines Hartian, Austinian and Hobbesian jurisprudence....Kramer's analyses make stimulatingreading....[H]e manages to clear much dead wood from the debate concerning the moral content of law and provides interesting arguments to which thosen of a different persuasion will have to respond
Kramer provides an exhaustive defense of legal positivism against those who attribute a necessary relationship between law and morality... [H]is argument is a useful counterweight to the predominance of liberal moralizing and American parochialism that plagues contemporary legal theorizing...Kramer thus performs a valuable reminder to his fellow legal theorists that the act of maintaining the law by judges can be as self-interested and hypocritical as can the partisan business of legislation. One hopes that legal scholars have not become too pious (or self-interested, for that matter) to take up Kramer's challenge.
Matthew Kramer's defence of legal positivism [is] densely and intelligently argued....[An] enormous investment of intellectual energy
Matthew Kramer's recent defense of legal positivism [is] one of the clearest and most powerful analyses to appear in recent years.
Matthew Kramer, with characteristic vigour and analytical force, presents a staunch defense of positivism against many popular forms of idealism and rejects many of the concessions that positivism has made to idealism....Kramer's defence of legal positivism is a powerful synthesis of the ideas of some of the most well-known expositors of the doctrine.Whilst his general approach is negative -- in that he attempts to provide rebuttals to many of the more popular idealist attacks on positivism -- he does present a positive thesis, and it is on this that attention is focused. His positive argument skilfully combines Hartian, Austinian and Hobbesian jurisprudence....Kramer's analyses make stimulatingreading....[H]e manages to clear much dead wood from the debate concerning the moral content of law and provides interesting arguments to which thosen of a different persuasion will have to respond
Kramer provides an exhaustive defense of legal positivism against those who attribute a necessary relationship between law and morality... [H]is argument is a useful counterweight to the predominance of liberal moralizing and American parochialism that plagues contemporary legal theorizing...Kramer thus performs a valuable reminder to his fellow legal theorists that the act of maintaining the law by judges can be as self-interested and hypocritical as can the partisan business of legislation. One hopes that legal scholars have not become too pious (or self-interested, for that matter) to take up Kramer's challenge.
Matthew Kramer's defence of legal positivism [is] densely and intelligently argued....[An] enormous investment of intellectual energy
Matthew Kramer's recent defense of legal positivism [is] one of the clearest and most powerful analyses to appear in recent years.
Notă biografică
Matthew Kramer is Professor of Legal and Political Philosophy at the University of Cambridge, and fellow and director of studies in Law at Churchill College Cambridge.