Cantitate/Preț
Produs

International Best Practices for Evaluation in the Health Professions

Autor William Mcgaghie
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 21 ian 2013
This unique text presents a comprehensive narrative on why and how health professions students need to be evaluated for practice in the 21st century. It systematically addresses current evaluation best practices in the health professions to identify today's evaluation benchmarks, reveal evaluation limits, address improvement pathways, and map a research agenda to boost future evaluation practices. Advancements in information and communication technology, bioscience and behavioral research, and worldwide travel are dissolving barriers that have separated professions, countries, and cultures for centuries. This book both celebrates these achievements and carefully considers next steps. It recognizes the huge improvements made in evaluation practices within the health professions over the past 40 years but asks for more - calling for added reform and better understanding of current practice from different social, cultural, and educational perspectives. International Best Practices for Evaluation in the Health Professions values crossprofessional programs that span boundaries and acknowledge the authority of the future rather than historical baggage. Educators worldwide will be enlightened and inspired by its straightforward, compelling narrative.
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 45074 lei

Preț vechi: 54086 lei
-17% Nou

Puncte Express: 676

Preț estimativ în valută:
8627 8971$ 7219£

Comandă specială

Livrare economică 22 februarie-08 martie

Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781846195150
ISBN-10: 1846195152
Pagini: 400
Ilustrații: illustrations
Dimensiuni: 305 x 152 x 27 mm
Greutate: 0.77 kg
Ediția:1 New ed.
Editura: CRC Press
Colecția CRC Press

Public țintă

Academic, Professional Practice & Development, and Professional Reference

Cuprins

Foreword. Preface. About the editor. List of contributors. Evaluation in the health professions: history and current practice. Criteria for a good assessment. Technology-enabled assessment of health professions education. Research on assessment practices. Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training. Clinical competence assessment. Evaluation of knowledge acquisition. Assessment of professionalism. Best practices in measuring healthcare team performance. Evaluating outcomes in continuing education and training. Culture, medical education and assessment. Workplace based assessment. An international review of the recertification and revalidation of physicians:  progress toward achieving best practices. Evaluation of health professions leadership and management and programs that teach these competencies. Evaluation for program and school accreditation. Looking to the future. Index.

Notă biografică

Dr. McGaghie is the Jacob R. Suker, MD, Professor of Medical Education and Professor of Preventive Medicine at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, where he has served since 1992. Dr. McGaghie's research and writing in medical education and preventive medicine ranges widely, including such topics as personnel and program evaluation, research methodology, medical simulations, attitude measurement, medical student selection, concept mapping, curriculum development, faculty development, standardized patients, and geriatrics. Dr. McGaghie has authored or edited eight books and has published more than 250 journal articles, textbook chapters, and book reviews in health professions education, simulation- based education, preventive medicine, and related fields.

Descriere

This unique text presents a comprehensive narrative on why and how health professions students need to be evaluated for practice in the 21st century. It systematically addresses current evaluation best practices in the health professions to identify today’s evaluation benchmarks, reveal evaluation limits, address improvement pathways, and map a research agenda to boost future evaluation practices.