Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Intractable Conflicts and Back-track Mediation: Turkish and Kurdish Peace Talks in Oslo

Autor Mehmet Deniz
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 20 dec 2024
This book provides an in-depth analysis of mediation, arguing that it represents a vital tool for third-party intervention, and that back-track mediation more specifically, as one of the tools of such intervention, is a pillar of mediation. It further considers the 'Kurdish question' of Turkey and the peace process initiatives between the Turkish state and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) from the first in 1993 to the recently-concluded Oslo Peace Talks in 2011. Rather than focusing on the historicity of the Kurdish issue, this book devotes significant attention to analysing the five peace processes to date by investing the theory of mediation in each process with a view to testing whether each initiative fits the essence of mediation and back-track mediation or not. The book additionally considers two issues of secondary importance:  the reiteration of the emergence of the ‘Kurdish question’ as a regional phenomenon responsible for derailing the Oslo Peace Talks between the parties, as well as the intractability of conflicts and how they have potential to acquire violent, intractable characters. This monograph applies this theoretical knowledge to consider how Turkish and Kurdish conflicts have gradually morphed into an intractable singular conflict.
 
 
 
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 59534 lei

Preț vechi: 65422 lei
-9% Nou

Puncte Express: 893

Preț estimativ în valută:
11392 11871$ 9432£

Carte nepublicată încă

Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9783031440595
ISBN-10: 3031440595
Pagini: 200
Ilustrații: Approx. 200 p. 20 illus.
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 mm
Ediția:2024
Editura: Springer Nature Switzerland
Colecția Palgrave Macmillan
Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland

Cuprins

Chapter 1: Introduction.- Chapter 2: Kurdish Question as a Regional Phenomenon.- Chapter 3: Theory of Mediation.- Chapter 4: Oslo Peace Talks and the Mediation Process.- Chapter 5: Limitations of Mediation.- Chapter 6: Important Implications.- Chapter 7: Conclusion.

Notă biografică

Mehmet Deniz is an expert on peace and conflict studies, and is interested in intractable conflicts and back-track mediation. He holds a PhD from Lancaster University, UK.
 
 
 

Textul de pe ultima copertă

This book provides an in-depth analysis of mediation, arguing that it represents a vital tool for third-party intervention, and that back-track mediation more specifically, as one of the tools of such intervention, is a pillar of mediation. It further considers the Kurdish question of Turkey and the peace process initiatives between the Turkish state and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) from the first in 1993 to the recently-concluded Oslo Peace Talks in 2011. Rather than focusing on the historicity of the Kurdish issue, this book devotes significant attention to analysing the five peace processes to date by investing the theory of mediation in each process with a view to testing whether each initiative fits the essence of mediation and back-track mediation or not. The book additionally considers two issues of secondary importance:  the reiteration of the emergence of the ‘Kurdish question’ as a regional phenomenon responsible for derailing the Oslo Peace Talks between the parties, as well as the intractability of conflicts and how they have potential to acquire violent, intractable characters. This monograph applies this theoretical knowledge to consider how Turkish and Kurdish conflicts have gradually morphed into an intractable singular conflict.
Mehmet Deniz is an expert on peace and conflict studies, and is interested in intractable conflicts, back-track mediation, and spoilers. He holds a PhD from Lancaster University, UK (2020).


Caracteristici

Argues that back-track mediation is the most viable tool in approaching violent intractable conflicts Approaches the theory of mediation from a different angle when compared to other texts Emphasizes back-track mediation’s potential in breaking political impasse and enabling urgent cease-fire