Investigating Civilian Casualties in Time of Armed Conflict and Belligerent Occupation: Manoeuvring between Legal Regimes and Paradigms for the Use of Force: International Humanitarian Law Series, cartea 54
Autor Alon Margaliten Limba Engleză Hardback – 18 iul 2018
Din seria International Humanitarian Law Series
- 18% Preț: 996.40 lei
- 18% Preț: 912.49 lei
- 18% Preț: 676.19 lei
- 18% Preț: 909.95 lei
- 18% Preț: 1425.23 lei
- 18% Preț: 670.01 lei
- 18% Preț: 1171.85 lei
- 18% Preț: 749.05 lei
- 18% Preț: 2393.65 lei
- 18% Preț: 746.78 lei
- 18% Preț: 1807.53 lei
- 18% Preț: 982.44 lei
- 18% Preț: 1059.93 lei
- 18% Preț: 828.20 lei
- 18% Preț: 947.92 lei
- 18% Preț: 1083.81 lei
- 18% Preț: 607.20 lei
- 18% Preț: 711.78 lei
- 18% Preț: 724.37 lei
- 18% Preț: 948.32 lei
- 18% Preț: 687.07 lei
- 18% Preț: 592.77 lei
- 18% Preț: 1703.15 lei
- 18% Preț: 901.97 lei
- 18% Preț: 791.30 lei
- 18% Preț: 790.50 lei
- 18% Preț: 1072.30 lei
- 18% Preț: 611.00 lei
- 18% Preț: 853.69 lei
- 18% Preț: 1206.24 lei
- 18% Preț: 1040.01 lei
- 18% Preț: 1039.54 lei
- 18% Preț: 1074.93 lei
- 18% Preț: 759.69 lei
- 18% Preț: 1160.99 lei
- 18% Preț: 786.33 lei
- 18% Preț: 1822.81 lei
- 18% Preț: 2201.79 lei
- 18% Preț: 816.01 lei
- 18% Preț: 986.03 lei
- 18% Preț: 740.84 lei
- 18% Preț: 853.62 lei
- 18% Preț: 761.62 lei
- 18% Preț: 981.37 lei
- 18% Preț: 531.12 lei
- 18% Preț: 1079.96 lei
- 18% Preț: 976.05 lei
- 18% Preț: 699.30 lei
- 18% Preț: 832.79 lei
Preț: 740.84 lei
Preț vechi: 903.46 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 1111
Preț estimativ în valută:
141.80€ • 147.79$ • 118.04£
141.80€ • 147.79$ • 118.04£
Carte indisponibilă temporar
Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:
Se trimite...
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9789004368200
ISBN-10: 9004368205
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.58 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria International Humanitarian Law Series
ISBN-10: 9004368205
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.58 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria International Humanitarian Law Series
Notă biografică
Alon Margalit, Ph.D. (2014), University of London, is an Israeli lawyer who has held various legal positions, including at the Intentional Committee of the Red Cross, the Norwegian Refugee Council, SOAS University of London and the Tel Aviv District Court.
Cuprins
Preface
List of Abbreviations
1 The Investigative Response to Civilian Casualties: More Questions Than Answers
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Taking a Closer Look
1.3 Book Overview
1.3.1The Use of Force, Civilian Casualties and Investigations
1.3.2Manoeuvring between Operational Paradigms and Legal Regimes
2 ‘The Trigger Question’: When Do Civilian Casualties Require an Investigation?
2.1 The Investigation Trigger under International Human Rights Law (ihrl)
2.2 The Investigation Trigger under the Law of Armed Conflict (loac)
2.2.1War Crimes
2.2.2A Failure of Precautions
2.2.3A Duty to Investigate All Cases of Civilian Casualties?
2.3 Conclusion
3 ‘The Standards Question’: How to Investigate Civilian Casualties?
3.1 Investigation Standards under ihrl
3.1.1General
3.1.2An Effective Investigation
3.1.3Independence and Impartiality
3.1.4Victim Involvement and Transparency
3.1.5A Formal and Professional Investigation and the Margin of Appreciation
3.2 Investigation Standards under loac
3.2.1General
3.2.2War Crimes
3.2.3A Failure of Precautions
3.3 Conclusion
4 Translating Investigation Obligations to loac Situations
4.1 The Interaction between ihrl and loac
4.2 Classification Issues
4.3 International Armed Conflict (iac)
4.4 Non-international Armed Conflict (niac)
4.5 A Conduct-of-Hostilities Paradigm: Temporal and Geographical Dimensions
4.6 Occupation
4.6.1General
4.6.2Troubled Occupation
4.6.3The Use of Force
4.7 Conclusion
5 Challenges in Classifying and Identifying the Applicable Normative Framework(s)
5.1 ‘Stretching’ a Hostilities Paradigm
5.1.1us
5.1.2uk
5.1.3Israel
5.2 ‘Stretching’ a Law-Enforcement Paradigm
5.2.1Iraq
5.2.2Afghanistan
5.2.3oPt
5.3 Uncertainty in Relation to the Intensity Test
5.4 iac/niac Classification
5.5 Further Complications: Additional Legal Sources and Policy Considerations
5.5.1uk, Canada
5.5.2us
5.6 The Applicability of ihrl
5.6.1General
5.6.2Effective Control and Provision of Governmental Services
5.6.3Consent of the Local Government
5.6.4Prolonged Occupation
5.7 Al-Skeini and B’tselem Cases: Two Sides of a Legal Coin
5.7.1Al-Skeini
5.7.2B’tselem
5.8 Conclusion
6 Investigation Models and Constraints in Domestic Military Justice Systems
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Models Identified in State Practice
6.2.1The Commander Model
6.2.2The Professional Model
6.2.3A Mixed Model: Mandatory Reporting to a Professional Body in Serious Cases
6.3 Conclusion
7 Military In-House Investigations and Some Mitigating Arrangements
7.1 Command Investigations
7.1.1A Controversial Mechanism
7.1.2Judging Command Investigations in Light of Their Function
7.2 Considering Mitigating Arrangements
7.2.1Enhancing the Involvement of Professional Bodies
7.2.2Setting Time Frames and Considering Initial Findings Carefully
7.2.3Openness
7.3 Problems with Professional Bodies
7.3.1Failure to Open a Formal and Professional Investigation
7.3.2Problems with the Conduct of Criminal Investigations
7.4 Conclusion
8 Civilian Oversight of Military Investigations
8.1 An Ad Hoc Civilian Investigatory Body
8.2 Administrative Review
8.3 Judicial Review
8.3.1General
8.3.2Jurisdiction and Admissibility
8.3.3The Scope of Review
8.4 A Permanent Civilian Expert Body
8.4.1The mpcc (Canada)
8.4.2hmic (uk)
8.4.3Israel
8.5 Conclusion
9 A Proposal for a Permanent Expert Commission
9.1 A Question of Mandate
9.1.1General
9.1.2External-Civilian Investigations?
9.1.3ihrl and Lessons Learned from the Civilian Oversight of Police Investigations
9.2 The Proposed Mandate
10 The Duty to Investigate and Shaping the Normative Discourse
10.1 The Difficulties of Investigating
10.2 Enhanced Scrutiny and Heavier Burden
10.3 State Pushback
10.4 A Permanent Expert Commission: Incentives for States
10.5 Conclusion
Table of Treaties and Other International Instruments
Table of International Cases 26
Table of Domestic Instruments
Table of Domestic Cases
Bibliography
List of Abbreviations
Part 1: Introduction
1 The Investigative Response to Civilian Casualties: More Questions Than Answers
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Taking a Closer Look
1.3 Book Overview
1.3.1The Use of Force, Civilian Casualties and Investigations
1.3.2Manoeuvring between Operational Paradigms and Legal Regimes
Part 2: Setting the Normative Framework
2 ‘The Trigger Question’: When Do Civilian Casualties Require an Investigation?
2.1 The Investigation Trigger under International Human Rights Law (ihrl)
2.2 The Investigation Trigger under the Law of Armed Conflict (loac)
2.2.1War Crimes
2.2.2A Failure of Precautions
2.2.3A Duty to Investigate All Cases of Civilian Casualties?
2.3 Conclusion
3 ‘The Standards Question’: How to Investigate Civilian Casualties?
3.1 Investigation Standards under ihrl
3.1.1General
3.1.2An Effective Investigation
3.1.3Independence and Impartiality
3.1.4Victim Involvement and Transparency
3.1.5A Formal and Professional Investigation and the Margin of Appreciation
3.2 Investigation Standards under loac
3.2.1General
3.2.2War Crimes
3.2.3A Failure of Precautions
3.3 Conclusion
4 Translating Investigation Obligations to loac Situations
4.1 The Interaction between ihrl and loac
4.2 Classification Issues
4.3 International Armed Conflict (iac)
4.4 Non-international Armed Conflict (niac)
4.5 A Conduct-of-Hostilities Paradigm: Temporal and Geographical Dimensions
4.6 Occupation
4.6.1General
4.6.2Troubled Occupation
4.6.3The Use of Force
4.7 Conclusion
Part 3: Investigating Civilian Casualties in Practice
5 Challenges in Classifying and Identifying the Applicable Normative Framework(s)
5.1 ‘Stretching’ a Hostilities Paradigm
5.1.1us
5.1.2uk
5.1.3Israel
5.2 ‘Stretching’ a Law-Enforcement Paradigm
5.2.1Iraq
5.2.2Afghanistan
5.2.3oPt
5.3 Uncertainty in Relation to the Intensity Test
5.4 iac/niac Classification
5.5 Further Complications: Additional Legal Sources and Policy Considerations
5.5.1uk, Canada
5.5.2us
5.6 The Applicability of ihrl
5.6.1General
5.6.2Effective Control and Provision of Governmental Services
5.6.3Consent of the Local Government
5.6.4Prolonged Occupation
5.7 Al-Skeini and B’tselem Cases: Two Sides of a Legal Coin
5.7.1Al-Skeini
5.7.2B’tselem
5.8 Conclusion
6 Investigation Models and Constraints in Domestic Military Justice Systems
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Models Identified in State Practice
6.2.1The Commander Model
6.2.2The Professional Model
6.2.3A Mixed Model: Mandatory Reporting to a Professional Body in Serious Cases
6.3 Conclusion
7 Military In-House Investigations and Some Mitigating Arrangements
7.1 Command Investigations
7.1.1A Controversial Mechanism
7.1.2Judging Command Investigations in Light of Their Function
7.2 Considering Mitigating Arrangements
7.2.1Enhancing the Involvement of Professional Bodies
7.2.2Setting Time Frames and Considering Initial Findings Carefully
7.2.3Openness
7.3 Problems with Professional Bodies
7.3.1Failure to Open a Formal and Professional Investigation
7.3.2Problems with the Conduct of Criminal Investigations
7.4 Conclusion
8 Civilian Oversight of Military Investigations
8.1 An Ad Hoc Civilian Investigatory Body
8.2 Administrative Review
8.3 Judicial Review
8.3.1General
8.3.2Jurisdiction and Admissibility
8.3.3The Scope of Review
8.4 A Permanent Civilian Expert Body
8.4.1The mpcc (Canada)
8.4.2hmic (uk)
8.4.3Israel
8.5 Conclusion
Part 4: Looking Forward
9 A Proposal for a Permanent Expert Commission
9.1 A Question of Mandate
9.1.1General
9.1.2External-Civilian Investigations?
9.1.3ihrl and Lessons Learned from the Civilian Oversight of Police Investigations
9.2 The Proposed Mandate
10 The Duty to Investigate and Shaping the Normative Discourse
10.1 The Difficulties of Investigating
10.2 Enhanced Scrutiny and Heavier Burden
10.3 State Pushback
10.4 A Permanent Expert Commission: Incentives for States
10.5 Conclusion
Table of Treaties and Other International Instruments
Table of International Cases 26
Table of Domestic Instruments
Table of Domestic Cases
Bibliography