Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
IUU Fishing as a Flag State Accountability Paradigm: Between Effectiveness and Legitimacy de Mercedes Rosello

IUU Fishing as a Flag State Accountability Paradigm: Between Effectiveness and Legitimacy: Queen Mary Studies in International Law, cartea 45

Autor Mercedes Rosello
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 2 iun 2021
Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing is a widely used designation for a broad range of fishing practices with a common theme: whether illegal or not, they cause damage to marine fish stocks and the human communities that depend on them. Yet, when subjected to thorough analysis, this pragmatic governance tool is revealed in a light that calls for caution against uncritical application. Unwrapping its uneasy relationship with international law, this study is ultimately a qualified defence of the IUU fishing paradigm, but also a practical proposal for its reform. This original book makes a genuine contribution to the international fisheries law and policy literature.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Queen Mary Studies in International Law

Preț: 70944 lei

Preț vechi: 86518 lei
-18% Nou

Puncte Express: 1064
Preț estimativ în valută:
13581€ • 14795$ • 11393£

Carte indisponibilă temporar


Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă
Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:
Trimite
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9789004462823
ISBN-10: 9004462821
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0.48 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria Queen Mary Studies in International Law

Cuprins

Acknowledgements
Acronyms
International Legislation and Voluntary Instruments
International Cases
International Arbitration
Advisory Opinions
European Union Cases
Domestic Cases
Resolutions of International Organisations
RFMOS

Introduction

PART 1
IUU Fishing as Interpretive Lens

1 Origins and Meaning of IUU Fishing
1.1 How Imperfect Regulatory Frameworks Enable IUU Fishing
1.1.1Drivers of IUU Fishing Activity
1.1.2Enablers of IUU Fishing Activity
1.2 Emergence and Function of IUU Fishing as a Governance Tool
1.2.1The Origins of the IUU Fishing Concept
1.2.2Integration of the IUU Concept in the International Legal Framework
1.2.2.1 Legal Interpretive Filter: Illegal Fishing
1.2.2.2 Hybrid Interpretive Filter: Unregulated Fishing
1.3 Conclusion

2 Rationale for an IUU Fishing Interpretive Lens
Introduction
2.1 International Law And The IUU Fishing Interpretive Lens
2.1.1Jurisdiction
2.2 The due Diligence Nature of Flag State Obligations
2.3 Conservation And Management
2.3.1The LOSC
2.3.2The UNFSA
2.3.3Effectiveness Limitations
2.4 Flag State Control Over Fishing Vessels’ High Seas Activities
2.4.1The LOSC
2.4.2The Compliance Agreement
2.4.3The UNFSA
2.4.4Effectiveness Limitations
2.5 The Duty to Cooperate
2.5.1The LOSC
2.5.2The Compliance Agreement
2.5.3The UNFSA
2.5.4Effectiveness Limitations
2.6 IUU Fishing Issues not Covered in the Fisheries Treaties
2.7 General Conduct Standards
2.8 Contribution to Effectiveness of the IUU Fishing Interpretive Lens
2.8.1Effectiveness Illustration: RFMO Compliance Practice
2.8.2Governance Effect of the IUU Fishing Interpretive Lens
2.9 Conclusion

PART 2
IUU Fishing As Compliance Mechanism

3 Compliance and State Responsibility
Chapter Introduction
3.1 State responsibility as Compliance Mechanism
3.2 State Responsibility and International Rules and Actors
3.2.1Exclusion of Rules and Actors
3.2.2Responsibility and Due Diligence Obligations
3.3 Reciprocal Structure of State Responsibility and Its Implications
3.4 Responsibility and erga omnes Obligations
3.5 Responsibility and erga omnes partes Obligations
3.6 Responsibility and Injury to Rights
3.7 Other Factors Limiting the Effectiveness of State Responsibility
3.8 Conclusion

4 IUU Fishing as Compliance Mechanism
Introduction
4.1 States and Compliance with International Obligations
4.2 The Compliance and Enforcement Dimensions of the IUU Fishing Paradigm
4.2.1Extraterritorial Port State Controls
4.2.2Extraterritorial Market Suspensions
4.2.3Conclusion
4.3 Critiques to IUU Fishing as a Compliance Mechanism
4.3.1Effectiveness Critique
4.3.2Legality Critique
4.3.3Legitimacy Critique
4.3.4Illustration: The Cambodia Case
4.3.5Implications of the Legitimacy Critique
4.4 Correcting the Legitimacy Flaws of the iuu Fishing Compliance Paradigm
4.5 Conclusion

PART 3
IUU Fishing as Flag State Accountability Paradigm

5 IUU Fishing and State Accountability
Introduction
5.1 A Conceptual Analysis of Accountability
5.1.1Meta-Analysis of Accountability Definitions
5.2 Beyond the Core Concept: Social Dimension of Accountability
5.2.1Rational Drivers to Participation
5.2.2Autonomy and Transparency in Conduct Disclosure
5.3 Tabular Analysis
5.4 Re-Conceptualisation of the iuu Fishing Compliance System as Accountability Mechanism
5.4.1Core Accountability Re-Construction in the IUU Fishing Context: Tabular Representation
5.4.2Broader Accountability Re-Construction
5.4.3Application of Critiques to Rational Models and Sanctions
5.5 Limitations of the Conceptual Accountability Model
5.6 Conclusion

6 IUU Fishing as Flag State Accountability Paradigm
Introduction
6.1 The IUU Fishing Accountability Paradigm and Effectiveness
6.2 The IUU Fishing Accountability Paradigm and Normativity
6.3 The IUU Fishing Paradigm and Regime Complexes
6.4 Shared Rules and Norms in Regime Complexes
6.4.1Norms and Practice in Regime Complexes
6.4.2Accountability as an ‘interactional’ Site of Rule Socialisation
6.4.2.1 A Methodology for the Norm-Rule-Conduct Evaluation Space
6.4.2.2 Interpretive Reciprocity and Analogy
6.4.3IUU Fishing as Flag State Accountability Paradigm
6.4.3.2 Addressing the Legality Critique
6.4.3.3 Addressing the Legitimacy Critique
6.5 Conclusion

Conclusion

Bibliography
Index

Notă biografică

Mercedes Rosello, Ph.D. (2019), University of Hull, is a Senior Lecturer at Leeds Beckett University. She has published numerous peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and blog posts on international and European Union fisheries law and policy topics.