Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Jesus, Rhetoric and Law: Biblical Interpretation Series, cartea 20

Autor Henderson
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 29 feb 1996
This study locates pre-gospel orality and gospel literacy within Greco-Roman rhetorical norms for education and performance. Heavy use of a few basic rhetorical conventions marks the gospel tradition as a marginal yet rhetorically competent attempt to create a Christian public.
The book identifies gnomic sayings as the thickest available sample of gospel rhetorics, an alternative to samples based on chreia and parable. Gnome-use is central throughout ancient rhetorical theory and practice. Gnome is therefore an especially good focus for comparative study, particularly of characterisation and legal topicality. This work establishes a credible model of interaction among the speech-habits of Jesus, those of early Christian oral tradition, and the innovative rhetorics of gospel and epistolary texts. The plurality of rhetorical-criticisms current in New Testament studies is also addressed.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Biblical Interpretation Series

Preț: 119160 lei

Preț vechi: 145317 lei
-18% Nou

Puncte Express: 1787

Preț estimativ în valută:
22803 23663$ 19060£

Carte indisponibilă temporar

Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9789004103771
ISBN-10: 9004103775
Pagini: 437
Dimensiuni: 166 x 246 x 32 mm
Greutate: 0.91 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill
Seria Biblical Interpretation Series


Public țintă

New Testament specialists, research libraries and advanced students interested in the Gospel, Historical Jesus, Pauline Studies or Greco-Roman rhetorical culture.

Notă biografică

Ian H. Henderson, D.Phil. (1988) in New Testament, Oxford, is Associate Professor of New Testament Studies at McGill University. He publishes regularly on questions of rhetoric, orality and literacy in early Christian literature and elsewhere in Greco-Roman culture.

Recenzii

'...extraordinary important volume...'
Jens Schroerer, Religious Studies Review, 2000.