Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Judicial Avoidance: Balancing Competences in Constitutional Adjudication: Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory

Autor Carolina Alves das Chagas
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 23 aug 2023
This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided? It explores examples of justiciability assessments and deferential approaches regarding the decision of another authority and examines legitimacy issues involving judicial avoidance. The reader is presented with answers to two fundamental questions that guide the development of the book:- Is it legitimate to practise judicial avoidance?- How could judicial avoidance be practised legitimately? The conflict of competences, which often emerges in instances of judicial avoidance, is an important book baseline. From this conflict, the book considers and defends the possibility of applying 'formal balancing' to provide a clearer structure of the exercise of justiciability and judicial deference. The 'formal balancing' methodology is based on Alexy's principles theory, and its connection with judicial avoidance represents a significant contribution and novel point in constitutional adjudication.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory

Preț: 50411 lei

Preț vechi: 73029 lei
-31% Nou

Puncte Express: 756

Preț estimativ în valută:
9651 10479$ 8116£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 16-30 decembrie
Livrare express 09-15 noiembrie pentru 12217 lei

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781509961498
ISBN-10: 1509961496
Pagini: 176
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 17 mm
Greutate: 0.42 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Seria Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory

Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Caracteristici

Presents a novel normative analysis of justiciability and judicial deference based on their connection with competences

Notă biografică

Carolina Alves das Chagas is Programme Coordinator at the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Austria.

Cuprins

1. Introduction Part One: First Legitimacy Question: Are Judicial Avoidance Practices Legitimate? 2. Judicial Avoidance: A Matter of Competence3. Judicial Avoidance and the Rule of LawPart Two: Second Legitimacy Question: The Methodology for Legitimate Judicial Avoidance4. Competence as Rules and Principles5. Judicial Avoidance and the Balancing Method6. Balancing Specificities in Judicial AvoidancePart Three: Instances of Avoidance and Legitimate Practice7. Admissibility Control: Establishing the Courts' Competence8. Merits Avoidance: The Degree of the Courts' Scrutiny