Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Jurisprudence or Legal Science

Editat de Sean Coyle, Professor George Pavlakos
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 30 mai 2005
Modern jurisprudence embodies two distinct traditions of thought about the nature of law. The first adopts a scientific approach which assumes that all legal phenomena possess universal characteristics that may be used in the analysis of any type of legal system. The main task of the legal philosopher is to disclose and understand such characteristics,which are thought to be capable of establishment independently of any moral or political values which the law might promote, and of any other context-dependent features of legal systems. Another form of jurisprudential reflection views the law as a complex form of moral arrangement which can only be analysed from within a system of reflective moral and political practices. Rather than conducting a search for neutral standpoints or criteria, this second form of theorising suggests that we uncover the nature and purpose of the law by reflecting on the dynamic properties of legal practice. Can legal philosophy aspire to scientific values of reasoning and truth? Is the idea of neutral standpoints an illusion? Should legal theorising be limited to the analysis of particular practices? Are the scientific and juristic approaches in the end as rigidly distinct from one another as some have claimed?In a series of important new essays the authors of Jurisprudence or Legal Science? attempt to answer these and other questions about the nature of jurisprudential thinking, whilst emphasising the connection of such 'methodological' concerns to the substantive legal issues which have traditionally defined the core of jurisprudential speculation. The list of contributors includes R. Alexy, S. Coyle, J. Gorman, C. Heidemann, P. Leith, J. Morison, G. Pavlakos and V. Rodriguez-Blanco.
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 53543 lei

Preț vechi: 77291 lei
-31% Nou

Puncte Express: 803

Preț estimativ în valută:
10248 10681$ 8531£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 07-21 ianuarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781841135045
ISBN-10: 1841135046
Pagini: 184
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 14 mm
Greutate: 0.44 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Notă biografică

Sean Coyle is a Reader in the Faculty of Law at University College London.George Pavlakos is Lecturer in Jurisprudence at Queen's University Belfast. From summer 2007 he will be Research Chair in Globalisation and Legal Theory at Antwerp University.

Cuprins

IntroductionGeorge Pavlakos and Sean Coyle 1. Two Concepts of Legal AnalysisSean Coyle2. The Truth of Legal AnalysisJonathan Gorman3. The Nature of Legal PhilosophyRobert Alexy4. Method in Law: Revision and DescriptionVeronica Rodriguez-Blanco5. Normative Knowledge and the Nature of LawGeorge Pavlakos6. Law's Claim to CorrectnessCarsten Heidemann7. Can Jurisprudence Without Empiricism Ever be a Science?Philip Leith and John Morison

Recenzii

This is a volume that is important and often exciting...we have a book in our hands that is worth reading and reflecting on.
Reading this book - carefully and critically - helps in clarifying these complex relationships between method and substance and between legal philosophy and other areas of philosophy, issues about which legal philosophers are still much in the shade.
.one of the main attractions of Jurisprudence or Legal Science is that it invites the reader to think along with the authors.
If we focus on this last opposition (legal theory as a study of the nature of law vs. legal theory as a situated enquiry of specific legal practices) we are in the best condition to both have a full grasp of the dilemma dealt with in Jurisprudence or Legal Science? and appreciate the originality of the contributions comprised in this volume.
As a whole, the contributions of the volume demonstrate at a high level the complexity of the topic as well as the various jurisprudential problems that are linked to it.

Descriere

In a series of new essays the authors attempt to answer important questions about the nature of jurisprudential thinking.