Landmark Cases in Defamation Law: Landmark Cases
Editat de Professor David Rolphen Limba Engleză Paperback – 24 feb 2021
Din seria Landmark Cases
- 18% Preț: 306.51 lei
- 28% Preț: 343.79 lei
- 18% Preț: 359.57 lei
- 22% Preț: 265.93 lei
- 18% Preț: 356.27 lei
- Preț: 321.54 lei
- Preț: 322.48 lei
- Preț: 270.94 lei
- 18% Preț: 320.40 lei
- Preț: 355.78 lei
- Preț: 353.91 lei
- 21% Preț: 281.89 lei
- 22% Preț: 273.32 lei
- 18% Preț: 307.06 lei
- 27% Preț: 506.79 lei
- 28% Preț: 466.60 lei
- 30% Preț: 657.99 lei
- 18% Preț: 306.69 lei
- 30% Preț: 659.36 lei
- 31% Preț: 715.27 lei
Preț: 263.20 lei
Preț vechi: 339.99 lei
-23% Nou
Puncte Express: 395
Preț estimativ în valută:
50.37€ • 53.14$ • 41.98£
50.37€ • 53.14$ • 41.98£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 03-17 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781509946686
ISBN-10: 1509946683
Pagini: 280
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.4 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Seria Landmark Cases
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1509946683
Pagini: 280
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.4 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Seria Landmark Cases
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
Caracteristici
An original study of the landmark cases in defamation law for Hart's acclaimed series, Landmark Cases.
Notă biografică
David Rolph is Professor of Law at the University of Sydney.
Cuprins
1. Campbell v Spottiswoode (1863) Paul Wragg2. Bonnard v Perryman (1891) David Rolph3. Byrne v Deane (1937) Barbara McDonald4. Kemsley v Foot (1952) Jason Boslan5. Lewis v Daily Telegraph (1964) Eric Barendt6. New York Times v Sullivan (1964) David Partlett7. Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1966) Mark Lunney8. Charleston v News Group Newspapers Ltd (1995) Ursula Cheer9. Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd (1999) Hilary Young10. Dow Jones & Company v Gutnick (2002) Kylie Pappalardo and Nicolas Suzor
Recenzii
Landmark Cases in Defamation Law is a rich source of learning in respect of the many important areas of defamation with which it deals. It is a valuable resource for judges, practitioners and students who have to deal with these areas. We owe a debt of gratitude to the contributors for enhancing our understanding of these areas of the law of defamation.