Lord Kilmuir: A Vignette
Autor Neil Duxburyen Limba Engleză Hardback – 20 mai 2015
Preț: 371.42 lei
Preț vechi: 517.28 lei
-28% Nou
Puncte Express: 557
Preț estimativ în valută:
71.09€ • 74.99$ • 59.24£
71.09€ • 74.99$ • 59.24£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 13-27 decembrie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781782256236
ISBN-10: 1782256237
Pagini: 146
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.32 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1782256237
Pagini: 146
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.32 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
Caracteristici
A charming intellectual biography of Lord Kilmuir, a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary in the 1950s and 60s, remembered for his involment in the Nuremberg trials and his role in the negotiations surrounding the ECHR.
Notă biografică
Neil Duxbury is Professor of English Law at the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Cuprins
I. Introduction II. Early Career III. Conservatism IV. Domestic Politics V. Suez VI. Judicial Independence VII. Kilmuir as Judge VIII. End of an Era IX. Europe X. Concluding Reflections
Recenzii
This short book goes a long way to explaining the Tory commitment to the ECHR at its inception. The case for our continued commitment to the European Court of Human Rights remains compelling. Duxbury's triumph is to explain why Kilmuir would agree.
This text is enlivened with acute asides on matters from the "research assessment exercise" for British universities to the "non-political" judge.
The book contain precious insight on the obligation of judges to visibly draw away from earlier political involvement upon appointment, on the dangers of extra-judicial writings and on how best to frame our judgements when addressing controversial subjects.
This text is enlivened with acute asides on matters from the "research assessment exercise" for British universities to the "non-political" judge.
The book contain precious insight on the obligation of judges to visibly draw away from earlier political involvement upon appointment, on the dangers of extra-judicial writings and on how best to frame our judgements when addressing controversial subjects.