Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Northern / Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges' Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity

Editat de Máiréad Enright, Dr Julie McCandless, Dr Aoife O'Donoghue
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 8 feb 2017
The Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project inaugurates a fresh dialogue on gender, legal judgment, judicial power and national identity in Ireland and Northern Ireland. Through a process of judicial re-imagining, the project takes account of the peculiarly Northern/Irish concerns in shaping gender through judicial practice. This collection, following on from feminist judgments projects in Canada, England and Australia takes the feminist judging methodology in challenging new directions. This book collects 26 rewritten judgments, covering a range of substantive areas. As well as opinions from appellate courts, the book includes fi rst instance decisions and a fi ctional review of a Tribunal of Inquiry. Each feminist judgment is accompanied by a commentary putting the case in its social context and explaining the original decision. The book also includes introductory chapters examining the project methodology, constructions of national identity, theoretical and conceptual issues pertaining to feminist judging, and the legal context of both jurisdictions. The book, shines a light on past and future possibilities - and limitations - for judgment on the island of Ireland.'This book provides a rich and expansive addition to the feminist judgments catalogue. The ... judgments demonstrate powerfully how Northern/Irish judges have contributed to the gendered politics of national identity, and how the narrow subject-positions they have created for women and 'others' could have been so much wider and more open.'Professor Rosemary Hunter, School of Law, Queen Mary University London.'The Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project is inspirational reading for anyone interested in feminism or Irish studies ... It is a model of how to conduct feminist enquiry. Its most innovative contribution to scholarship and politics is how the rewriting of landmark legal judgments from a feminist perspective allows us to imagine (and therefore begin to construct) a more egalitarian, a more just, future.'Associate Professor Katherine O'Donnell, School of Philosophy, University College Dublin.If you let it, this book will make you think. ... It made me think - it reminded me, I suppose - that legal writing can be wonderful: rigorous, creative, deeply observant, provocative. Read it and see what it makes you think. Professor Thérèse Murphy, School of Law, Queen's University Belfast
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 47793 lei

Preț vechi: 65373 lei
-27% Nou

Puncte Express: 717

Preț estimativ în valută:
9147 9650$ 7623£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 02-16 ianuarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781849465748
ISBN-10: 1849465746
Pagini: 704
Dimensiuni: 171 x 244 x 22 mm
Greutate: 1.2 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Caracteristici

The editors bring together a broad new community of Irish feminist scholars around an ambitious Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project.

Notă biografică

Máiréad Enright is a Senior Lecturer at Birmingham Law School.Julie McCandless is Assistant Professor at the Law Department of the London School of Economics and Political Science.Aoife O'Donoghue is a Senior Lecturer at Durham Law School.

Cuprins

PART I: INTRODUCTION1. Introduction: Troubling Judgment Julie McCandless, Máiréad Enright and Aoife O'Donoghue2. 'Involuntary Patriotism': Judgment, Women and National Identity on the Island of Ireland Máiréad Enright3. Doing Feminist Judgments Mary Shine Thompson4. Judging and the Judgment Writing Process: A Northern/Irish PerspectiveAoife O'Donoghue PART II: MOTHERING SUBJECTS5. McGee v Attorney GeneralCommentary: Emilie Cloatre and Máiréad Enright Judgment: Máiréad Enright 6. Flynn v PowerCommentary: Deirdre McGowan Judgment: Eoin Daly 7. MhicMhathúna v Attorney GeneralCommentary: Colm O'Cinnéide Judgment: Liam Thornton 8. Matrimonial Homes BillCommentary: Louise Crowley Judgment: Lucy-Ann Buckley 9. National and Provincial Building Society v LyndCommentary: David Capper Judgment: Lorna Fox O'Mahony 10. The Report of the Tribunal of Inquiry into the 'Kerry Babies Case'Commentary: Yvonne Marie Daly Judgment: Vicky Conway PART III: OTHERED SUBJECTS11. McGimpsey v IrelandCommentary: Ruth Alice Houghton Judgment: Aoife O'Donoghue 12. In Re WhiteCommentary: Carmel Roulston Judgment: Catherine O'Rourke 13. Lobe v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law ReformCommentary: Hilkka Becker Judgment: Siobhán Mullally and Cliodhna Murphy 14. Zappone and Gilligan v The Revenue Commissioners, Ireland and the Attorney GeneralCommentary: Siobhán Wills and Máiréad Enright Judgment: Fiona de Londras 15. In Re E (a child) (the 'Holy Cross' case)Commentary: Christine Bell FBA Judgment: Colin Murray 16. O'Keeffe v HickeyCommentary: Laura Hilly Judgment: Maeve O'Rourke 17. Christian Brothers High School Clonmel v Mary Stokes and the Equality AuthorityCommentary: Claire Bruton Judgment: Olivia Smith PART IV: CHOOSING SUBJECTS18. Attorney General v XCommentary: Sheelagh McGuinness Judgment: Ruth Fletcher 19. North Western Health Board v HW and CW (the PKU case)Commentary: Donal Coffey Judgment: Maebh Harding 20. PM v The Board of Management of St Vincent's Hospital andJustin Geoghegan and the Attorney GeneralCommentary: Claire Murray Judgment: Mary Donnelly 21. Re Family Planning Association of Northern Ireland v The Minister for Health, Social Services and Public SafetyCommentary: Sara Ramshaw Judgment: Kathryn McNeilly 22. Society for the Protection of Unborn Children's Application for Judicial ReviewCommentary: John Kennedy Judgment: Claire McCann PART V: EMBODIED SUBJECTS23. DPP v TiernanCommentary: Liz Campbell Judgment: Louise Kennefi ck and Caroline Fennell 24. McKinley v Minister for DefenceCommentary: Fergus Ryan Judgment: Joanne Conaghan 25. BJM v CMCommentary: Christine Ryan Judgment: Aideen Ryan and Katie Dawson 26. DPP v CCommentary: Anna Arstein-Kerslake Judgment: Eilionóir Flynn and Sinéad Ring 27. CC v IrelandCommentary: Cian Ó Concubhair Judgment: David Prendergast 28. Foy v Ant-Ard ChláraitheoirCommentary: Ivana Bacik Judgment: Tanya Ní Mhuirthile 29. Barnes v Belfast City CouncilCommentary: Fiona Cooke Judgment: Marie Fox30. A and B (by C) v A (Health and Social Services Trust)Commentary: Marian Duggan Judgment: Julie McCandless

Recenzii

The need for such a work is apparent: women have been under-represented in Irish courts before and after independence, meaning that their voices have been absent. The depth of research that went into this work is admirable and gives it credibility...This book is wonderfully insightful and is an essential and highly recommended companion reader to one-sided cases which do not truly do justice.
This fascinating book will be much used educationally, since it is deeply instructive to compare the re-judgments with the official judgments.