Occasions of Identity: A Study in the Metaphysics of Persistence, Change, and Sameness
Autor André Galloisen Limba Engleză Paperback – 6 mar 2003
Preț: 323.16 lei
Preț vechi: 395.30 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 485
Preț estimativ în valută:
61.84€ • 64.73$ • 51.47£
61.84€ • 64.73$ • 51.47£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 19-25 martie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780199261833
ISBN-10: 0199261830
Pagini: 312
Dimensiuni: 138 x 215 x 17 mm
Greutate: 0.42 kg
Ediția:Revised
Editura: OUP OXFORD
Colecția OUP Oxford
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 0199261830
Pagini: 312
Dimensiuni: 138 x 215 x 17 mm
Greutate: 0.42 kg
Ediția:Revised
Editura: OUP OXFORD
Colecția OUP Oxford
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Recenzii
Review from previous edition a detailed, well-written presentation and defense of one attempt to solve many of the recently much discussed puzzles in the metaphysics of material objects. It is engaging not only for Gallois's ingenious attempt to defend his view that objects can be "occasionally identical" ... but for his discussion throughout of the puzzles and of alternative solutions ... Even where one disagrees, there is excellent food for thought and discussion here.
There is no question that Gallois has done a great job in sorting out the issue and throwing light on 'the dark doctrine' of occasional and contingent identity.... Many sopisticated and original arguments.
The book is well-organised and clearly written ... Gallois is very clever and ingenious in his defence of the Occasional Identity Thesis and is broadly fair to his opponents, about whose positions he is well-informed. His arguments are rigorous and well-constructed and his mastery of some tricky points of logic is impressive.
There is no question that Gallois has done a great job in sorting out the issue and throwing light on 'the dark doctrine' of occasional and contingent identity.... Many sopisticated and original arguments.
The book is well-organised and clearly written ... Gallois is very clever and ingenious in his defence of the Occasional Identity Thesis and is broadly fair to his opponents, about whose positions he is well-informed. His arguments are rigorous and well-constructed and his mastery of some tricky points of logic is impressive.