On Reasonable Liability: A Comparison of Dutch and Canadian Law regarding the limits of criminal liability

— Prologue.- One — Summary Notes on the Criminal Law of Canada.- One — Introduction.- Two — Canadian Common Law.- Three — Dutch Civil Law.- Four — Legislative Powers in Canada.- Five — The Judiciary.- Six — Sources of Canadian Criminal Law.- Seven — Basic Notions.- Eight — The Qualifying Factors.- Nine — The Disqualifying Factors Grounds for Impunity.- Ten — Negligence.- Eleven — Causality.- Twelve — Reasonable Attribution of Liability.- Thirteen — Criminal Liability.- Two — On Reasonaple Liability.- One — Strict Liability.- Two — Strict Liability in Dutch Criminal Law.- Three — Some Fictions in Common Law.- Four — Strict Responsibility and Penal Offences.- Five — An Aside with Respect to Evidence.- Six — The Res Ipsa Argument.- Seven — Justification of Punishment for Negligence.- Eight — The Case in Favor and Against Strict Responsibility.- Nine — Separating the Strict from the Absolute.- Ten — The Halfway House Doctrine.- Eleven — Due Diligence Before the Courts.- Twelve — In Defence of Due Diligence.- Thirteen — The AVAS Defence.- Fourteen — The Defence of Due Diligence in Canadian Criminal Law.- - Epilogue.- - Samenvatting.- - Footnotes.- Table of Cases.- Common Law Cases.- Dutch Case Law.- Curriculum Vitae.