Origins of the Sphinx: Celestial Guardian of Pre-Pharaonic Civilization
Autor Robert M. Schoch Ph.D., Robert Bauvalen Limba Engleză Paperback – 4 mai 2017
In this provocative collaboration from two Egyptology outsiders, Robert M. Schoch, Ph.D., and Robert Bauval combine their decades of research to show how the Sphinx is thousands of years older than the conventional Egyptological timeline and was built by a long forgotten pre-Pharaonic civilization. They examine the known history of the Sphinx, contrasting what Egyptologists claim with prominent historical accounts and new research, including updates to Schoch’s geological water weathering research and reanalysis of seismic studies. Building on Bauval’s Orion Correlation Theory, they investigate the archaeoastronomical alignments of the monuments of the Giza Plateau and reveal how the pyramids and Sphinx were built to align with the constellations of Orion and Leo. Analyzing the evidence for a significantly older construction phase at Giza and the restoration and recarving of the Sphinx during the Old Kingdom era, they assert that the Sphinx was first built by an advanced pre-Pharaonic civilization that existed circa 12,000 years ago on the Giza Plateau, contemporaneous with the sophisticated Göbekli Tepe complex.
Preț: 102.22 lei
Preț vechi: 132.51 lei
-23% Nou
Puncte Express: 153
Preț estimativ în valută:
19.56€ • 20.32$ • 16.25£
19.56€ • 20.32$ • 16.25£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 17-29 ianuarie 25
Livrare express 27 decembrie 24 - 02 ianuarie 25 pentru 69.05 lei
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781620555255
ISBN-10: 1620555255
Pagini: 528
Ilustrații: Includes 16-page color insert and 247 b&w illustrations
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 28 mm
Greutate: 0.7 kg
Editura: Inner Traditions/Bear & Company
Colecția Inner Traditions
ISBN-10: 1620555255
Pagini: 528
Ilustrații: Includes 16-page color insert and 247 b&w illustrations
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 28 mm
Greutate: 0.7 kg
Editura: Inner Traditions/Bear & Company
Colecția Inner Traditions
V-ar putea interesa
-
The Orion MysteryAdrian Gilbert-17%Preț: 57.99 lei69.54 lei -
The Orion Mystery: Unlocking the Secrets of the PyramidsRobert BauvalPreț: 120.34 lei -
Gods, Sages and KingsDavid FrawleyPreț: 127.84 lei -
Magicians of the GodsGraham Hancock-21%Preț: 66.52 lei84.64 lei -
Preț: 125.18 lei -
Preț: 138.06 lei -
Preț: 95.13 lei -
-29%Preț: 129.41 lei182.88 lei -
Preț: 92.70 lei -
Preț: 144.41 lei -
The Egypt CodeRobert BauvalPreț: 140.16 lei
Notă biografică
Robert M. Schoch, Ph.D., a tenured faculty member at Boston University, earned his doctorate in geology and geophysics at Yale University. Known for his research on the Sphinx, he is the author of several books, including Forgotten Civilization. Egyptian-born Robert Bauval began studying Egyptology in 1983. The author of numerous books, including The Orion Mystery and Black Genesis, he lives in Torremolinos, Spain.
Extras
2
The Sands of Time
Robert M. Schoch
Revealing the Sphinx
The Nineteenth Century
The most significant and extensive excavations of the Great Sphinx took place in the first half of the nineteenth century. This was an era before the use of photography in archaeology and there was rarely any systematic recording or preservation of what came out of the ground or was found in or among the ancient structures. Indeed, the early archaeologists and Egyptologists were often not averse to applying brute force in their attempts to penetrate the ancient secrets. Thus, to cite one of the most famous examples, Colonel Richard William Howard Vyse (1784-1865) used gunpowder within the Great Pyramid to blast passages into the so-called Relieving Chambers above the King’s Chamber.
The Great Sphinx did not require quite so harsh an excavation, and exploration techniques were applied most likely because they were not suitable to the shifting sands that had over the millennia buried the statue. Blasting with gunpowder would not only have been inefficient, but counterproductive.
The first and greatest excavations of the Sphinx in modern times were carried out by a former mercantile sea captain from Genoa, Giovanni Battista Caviglia (1770-1845), who arrived in Egypt in December 1816 and, fascinated by the Sphinx and pyramids, worked on and off at Giza for the next twenty odd years, beginning with an excavation of the Great Sphinx in 1817. For a time, Caviglia actually took up residence in the Great Pyramid, using Davison’s Chamber as his “apartment.”
The Great Sphinx and Giza Pyramids have attracted more than their fair share of odd thinkers over the centuries, and Caviglia was no exception. He was immersed in occultism, mysticism, and his own brand of religious fundamentalism and Old Testament literalism. Caviglia was certain that encoded in the antiquities of Egypt, and Giza in particular, lay many esoteric, religious, and scientific secrets--if only they could be interpreted correctly. His excavations and studies were not undertaken lightly as simply a hobby or a means to supply European museums with prize works of ancient art, but with the idea that the key to deep and profound knowledge would be discovered.
Caviglia was the first person since ancient times to oversee a major clearance of the accumulated sand around the Great Sphinx. The French savants under Napoleon Bonaparte during his invasion of Egypt (1798-1799) had been aware that there was the body of a beast under the sand, as they cleared and studied the contours of the back, but they had not carried out full-scale excavations.
The truth concerning the extent of any French excavations is unclear. Regarding a supposed door, it is possible that they did carry out excavations and came upon at least the upper portion of the granite “Dream Stela” of Tuthmosis IV (ca. 1400 BCE) that sits to this day between the paws of the Sphinx, and perhaps this was mistaken for a door.
Caviglia began in early 1817 by excavating at the left (northern) shoulder of the Sphinx. His workmen were digging through loose sand and, according to Salt, more than half the sand removed each day would be blown back by the wind at night. Furthermore, despite utilizing a framework of planks to hold back the sand, the situation was incredibly perilous; one false move or accident could have resulted in someone being smothered to death in an avalanche of sand. Ultimately this first attempt at excavation had to be abandoned, but not before Caviglia’s laborers had reached the base of the Sphinx by creating a trench that measured twenty feet across the top but narrowed to a mere three feet at the bottom. Along the side of the trench a section of the body of the Sphinx was revealed, where they could make preliminary observations.
The external surface of the body in this part was found to be composed of irregularly sized stones, built up with much care, and covered with red paint, with no very clear indications of form, but having three protruding ledges, one below the other, sufficiently broad for a man to walk upon, that formed in all probability the lines of the mantle, or dress . . . (Salt, in Usick and Manley 2007, 65).
These irregularly sized stones and the ledges that were observed probably relate to the very ancient weathering and erosion to the body of the Sphinx that was subsequently repaired in later ancient times. There is evidence that at various times the Great Sphinx, either in its entirety or selected portions, was painted. Alternatively, some of the supposed “red paint” may also be natural mineral streaks, although in this case I suspect that Caviglia had found actual traces of red paint on various ancient repairs to the Sphinx.
During the months of March through June of 1817 Caviglia employed sixty to a hundred laborers each day to undertake large-scale excavations of the paws and body of the Sphinx. These excavations result in a number of important discoveries. The first was fragments of a giant plaited beard that had once belonged to the Sphinx. Some of the stone fragments included plaited beard hair on one side, and on a side at right angles to the plaited hair occurred various carved hieroglyphics and kneeling human figures. Other fragments of the beard and supporting masonry were found, but whether the Sphinx originally had a beard and when the beard fragments found by Caviglia were put in place (could they be New Kingdom additions?) remain open questions. We must remember that the Sphinx has been heavily modified, reworked, and restored numerous times in its long history.
The Sands of Time
Robert M. Schoch
Revealing the Sphinx
The Nineteenth Century
The most significant and extensive excavations of the Great Sphinx took place in the first half of the nineteenth century. This was an era before the use of photography in archaeology and there was rarely any systematic recording or preservation of what came out of the ground or was found in or among the ancient structures. Indeed, the early archaeologists and Egyptologists were often not averse to applying brute force in their attempts to penetrate the ancient secrets. Thus, to cite one of the most famous examples, Colonel Richard William Howard Vyse (1784-1865) used gunpowder within the Great Pyramid to blast passages into the so-called Relieving Chambers above the King’s Chamber.
The Great Sphinx did not require quite so harsh an excavation, and exploration techniques were applied most likely because they were not suitable to the shifting sands that had over the millennia buried the statue. Blasting with gunpowder would not only have been inefficient, but counterproductive.
The first and greatest excavations of the Sphinx in modern times were carried out by a former mercantile sea captain from Genoa, Giovanni Battista Caviglia (1770-1845), who arrived in Egypt in December 1816 and, fascinated by the Sphinx and pyramids, worked on and off at Giza for the next twenty odd years, beginning with an excavation of the Great Sphinx in 1817. For a time, Caviglia actually took up residence in the Great Pyramid, using Davison’s Chamber as his “apartment.”
The Great Sphinx and Giza Pyramids have attracted more than their fair share of odd thinkers over the centuries, and Caviglia was no exception. He was immersed in occultism, mysticism, and his own brand of religious fundamentalism and Old Testament literalism. Caviglia was certain that encoded in the antiquities of Egypt, and Giza in particular, lay many esoteric, religious, and scientific secrets--if only they could be interpreted correctly. His excavations and studies were not undertaken lightly as simply a hobby or a means to supply European museums with prize works of ancient art, but with the idea that the key to deep and profound knowledge would be discovered.
Caviglia was the first person since ancient times to oversee a major clearance of the accumulated sand around the Great Sphinx. The French savants under Napoleon Bonaparte during his invasion of Egypt (1798-1799) had been aware that there was the body of a beast under the sand, as they cleared and studied the contours of the back, but they had not carried out full-scale excavations.
The truth concerning the extent of any French excavations is unclear. Regarding a supposed door, it is possible that they did carry out excavations and came upon at least the upper portion of the granite “Dream Stela” of Tuthmosis IV (ca. 1400 BCE) that sits to this day between the paws of the Sphinx, and perhaps this was mistaken for a door.
Caviglia began in early 1817 by excavating at the left (northern) shoulder of the Sphinx. His workmen were digging through loose sand and, according to Salt, more than half the sand removed each day would be blown back by the wind at night. Furthermore, despite utilizing a framework of planks to hold back the sand, the situation was incredibly perilous; one false move or accident could have resulted in someone being smothered to death in an avalanche of sand. Ultimately this first attempt at excavation had to be abandoned, but not before Caviglia’s laborers had reached the base of the Sphinx by creating a trench that measured twenty feet across the top but narrowed to a mere three feet at the bottom. Along the side of the trench a section of the body of the Sphinx was revealed, where they could make preliminary observations.
The external surface of the body in this part was found to be composed of irregularly sized stones, built up with much care, and covered with red paint, with no very clear indications of form, but having three protruding ledges, one below the other, sufficiently broad for a man to walk upon, that formed in all probability the lines of the mantle, or dress . . . (Salt, in Usick and Manley 2007, 65).
These irregularly sized stones and the ledges that were observed probably relate to the very ancient weathering and erosion to the body of the Sphinx that was subsequently repaired in later ancient times. There is evidence that at various times the Great Sphinx, either in its entirety or selected portions, was painted. Alternatively, some of the supposed “red paint” may also be natural mineral streaks, although in this case I suspect that Caviglia had found actual traces of red paint on various ancient repairs to the Sphinx.
During the months of March through June of 1817 Caviglia employed sixty to a hundred laborers each day to undertake large-scale excavations of the paws and body of the Sphinx. These excavations result in a number of important discoveries. The first was fragments of a giant plaited beard that had once belonged to the Sphinx. Some of the stone fragments included plaited beard hair on one side, and on a side at right angles to the plaited hair occurred various carved hieroglyphics and kneeling human figures. Other fragments of the beard and supporting masonry were found, but whether the Sphinx originally had a beard and when the beard fragments found by Caviglia were put in place (could they be New Kingdom additions?) remain open questions. We must remember that the Sphinx has been heavily modified, reworked, and restored numerous times in its long history.
Cuprins
Acknowledgments
Preface
Robert M. Schoch
ONE
The Great Paradox
Robert Bauval
TWO
The Sands of Time
Robert M. Schoch
THREE
Khafre: To Be or Not To Be?
Robert Bauval
FOUR
A Case of Mistaken Identity?
Robert Bauval
FIVE
Horus Who Dwells in the Horizon
Robert Bauval
SIX
The Place Where the Gods Are Born
Robert Bauval
SEVEN
The Writing on the Wall
Robert M. Schoch
Epilogue
Robert M. Schoch
Appendix 1
The “Paradigm Police” and the Upside-Down Worldview of an Authoritative “Expert”
Robert Bauval
Appendix 2
The Orion Correlation Theory: Can It Be Falsified?
Robert Bauval
Appendix 3
The Ancient Egyptians and the Zodiacal Constellation of Leo
Robert Bauval
Appendix 4
The Sacred Mounds of the Memphite Region
Robert Bauval
Appendix 5
Text of the Dream Stela
Translation by J. H. Breasted, 1906
Appendix 6
Redating the Great Sphinx of Giza: The Original 1992 Paper
Robert M. Schoch
Appendix 7
Geological Evidence Pertaining to the Age of the Great Sphinx, Including Replies to the Critics
Robert M. Schoch
Appendix 8
Was the Great Sphinx Surrounded by a Moat? Was the Sphinx Originally Anubis?
Robert M. Schoch
Appendix 9
Controversies concerning the End of the Last Ice Age
Robert M. Schoch
Bibliography
About the Authors
Index
Preface
Robert M. Schoch
ONE
The Great Paradox
Robert Bauval
TWO
The Sands of Time
Robert M. Schoch
THREE
Khafre: To Be or Not To Be?
Robert Bauval
FOUR
A Case of Mistaken Identity?
Robert Bauval
FIVE
Horus Who Dwells in the Horizon
Robert Bauval
SIX
The Place Where the Gods Are Born
Robert Bauval
SEVEN
The Writing on the Wall
Robert M. Schoch
Epilogue
Robert M. Schoch
Appendix 1
The “Paradigm Police” and the Upside-Down Worldview of an Authoritative “Expert”
Robert Bauval
Appendix 2
The Orion Correlation Theory: Can It Be Falsified?
Robert Bauval
Appendix 3
The Ancient Egyptians and the Zodiacal Constellation of Leo
Robert Bauval
Appendix 4
The Sacred Mounds of the Memphite Region
Robert Bauval
Appendix 5
Text of the Dream Stela
Translation by J. H. Breasted, 1906
Appendix 6
Redating the Great Sphinx of Giza: The Original 1992 Paper
Robert M. Schoch
Appendix 7
Geological Evidence Pertaining to the Age of the Great Sphinx, Including Replies to the Critics
Robert M. Schoch
Appendix 8
Was the Great Sphinx Surrounded by a Moat? Was the Sphinx Originally Anubis?
Robert M. Schoch
Appendix 9
Controversies concerning the End of the Last Ice Age
Robert M. Schoch
Bibliography
About the Authors
Index
Recenzii
“For a quarter-century, Schoch’s analysis of weathering at Giza and Bauval’s archaeoastronomic discoveries have challenged the consensus on prehistory, not merely of Egypt but of the world. This book expertly summarizes their case and its triumphant vindication in the 12,000-year-old sanctuary of Göbekli Tepe. The question is no longer whether they are right but where archaeology should go from here.”
"Schoch and Bauval present a well-written, well-argued and well-illustrated (including 16 colour plates) thesis which deserves serious consideration."
"Schoch and Bauval present a well-written, well-argued and well-illustrated (including 16 colour plates) thesis which deserves serious consideration."
Descriere
New research and evidence that the Sphinx is thousands of years older than previously thought