Ownership, Control and Ideology: An Enquiry into Certain Aspects of Modern Business Ideology: Routledge Library Editions: Industrial Relations
Autor Theo Nicholsen Limba Engleză Hardback – oct 2024
Preț: 512.58 lei
Preț vechi: 775.26 lei
-34% Nou
Puncte Express: 769
Preț estimativ în valută:
98.10€ • 104.13$ • 81.74£
98.10€ • 104.13$ • 81.74£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 27 decembrie 24 - 10 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781032806525
ISBN-10: 1032806524
Pagini: 272
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.66 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Routledge Library Editions: Industrial Relations
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1032806524
Pagini: 272
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.66 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Routledge Library Editions: Industrial Relations
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Public țintă
Academic, Adult education, General, Postgraduate, Undergraduate Advanced, and Undergraduate CoreCuprins
Part 1. Theorists of Managerialism 1. The Managerialism of Berle 2. The Managerialism of Burnham 3. Dahrendorf and Managerial Theory 4. The Quintessence of Managerialism Part 2. Toward a Reconsideration of Managerial Theory 5. Some Sources of Confusion 6. Capitalism without Capitalists? 7. Technology without Technocrats? 8. Professionalism without Professionals? 9. Managerial Economics 10. Social Experience and Values – I 11. Social Experience and Values – II 12. Are the ‘Managers’ a New Class? 13. Some Concluding Comments Part 3. Contemporary Business Ideology 14. Business Ideology in Northern City 15. Questions of Meaning and Ethics 16. Traditionalism, Professionalism and the Ideology of Businessmen 17. Of Conflict and Organicism, Materialism and Social Responsibility
Descriere
Ownership, Control and Ideology (1969) looks at the debate surrounding issues of ownership and control. It analyses a large body of existing literature from several disciplines, examining the ‘factual’ issues but also showing that the terminology of the debate also requires fundamental re-analysis.