Peirce’s and Lewis’s Theories of Induction
Autor Chung-ying Chengen Limba Engleză Paperback – 1969
Preț: 383.93 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 576
Preț estimativ în valută:
73.47€ • 76.42$ • 60.66£
73.47€ • 76.42$ • 60.66£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 14-28 aprilie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9789401185981
ISBN-10: 9401185980
Pagini: 224
Ilustrații: XIII, 206 p.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 x 12 mm
Greutate: 0.32 kg
Ediția:1969
Editura: SPRINGER NETHERLANDS
Colecția Springer
Locul publicării:Dordrecht, Netherlands
ISBN-10: 9401185980
Pagini: 224
Ilustrații: XIII, 206 p.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 x 12 mm
Greutate: 0.32 kg
Ediția:1969
Editura: SPRINGER NETHERLANDS
Colecția Springer
Locul publicării:Dordrecht, Netherlands
Public țintă
ResearchCuprins
I: Introduction.- 1. Problem of Justifying Induction and Proposal for Its Dissolution.- 2. Two Types of Recent Arguments for the Validity of Induction.- 3. Arguments from Paradigm Cases and Uses of Words.- 4. Practical Arguments.- 5. Induction as a Genuine Problem and Study of Peirce and Lewis.- II: Scope of Peirce’s Theory of Induction.- III: The Nature and Validity of Inference.- 1. A General Theory of Inference.- 2. Necessary Inference and Probable Inference.- 3. Validity of Probable Inference.- IV: Probable Inference and Justifying Induction.- 1. Induction and Apagogical Inversion of Statistical Deduction.- 2. Induction As a Valid Probable Inference.- V: Requirements for the Validity of Induction.- 1. General Remakrs.- 2. Peirce on Fair Sampling and Fair Samples.- 3. Principle of Fair Sampling: A New Formulation.- 4. Peirce on Predesignation.- 5. Relevancy of Predesignation for the Validity of Induction.- VI: Probability and the Validity of Induction.- 1. General Remarks.- 2. Peirce’s Two Empirical Conceptions of Probability.- 3. Peirce’s Objections to the Laplacian Definition of Probability and Criticism.- VII: A Non-Probabilistic Justification of Induction.- 1. General Remarks.- 2. Self-Correcting Nature of Inductive Method.- 3. Criteria for Defining Truth and Justifying Induction.- 4. Other Arguments for the Necessity of General Validity of Induction.- VIII: Concluding Remarks on Peirce’s Non-Probabilistic Justification on Induction.- IX: Problems in Lewis’s Theory of Induction.- X: Induction and Analysis of Knowledge of Reality.- 1. General Remarks.- 2. Empirical Knowledge and “A priori” Concepts.- 3. A Fundamental Principle in Establishing Criteria of Reality.- XI: An “A Priori Analytical” Justification of Induction.- 1. General Remarks.- 2.Problems of Justifying Induction in the Theories of Reality and Knowledge.- 3. Empirical Generalizations as Interpretations of Experience and Principle A.- 4. Analyticity of Principle A.- XII: Implications of Lewis’s “A Priori Analytical Justification of Induction.- 1. From Principle A to Justification of Argument from Past to Future.- 2. Lewis on the Practical Successfulness of Induction.- XIII: Concluding Remarks on Lewis’s “A Priori Analytical” Justification of Induction.- XIV: Nature of Probability and Rational Credibility.- 1. General Remarks.- 2. Empirical Interpretation of Probability.- 3. Logical Interpretation of Probability.- 4. Rational Credibility, Fair Sampling and Logical Probability.- XV: Criteria for Determining Rational Credibility.- 1. Questions Regarding Criteria for Determining Rational Credibility.- 2. Degrees of Rational Credibility and Criteria for Determining Them.- 3. Justifying Acceptance of Criteria for Determining Rational Credibility.- XVI: Conclusion.- 1. Similarity Between Peirce’s and Lewis’s Theories of Induction.- 2. Significances of Peirce’s and Lewis’s Arguments.- 3. Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Justifying Induction.- 4. Bearings upon Practicist and Linguist Arguments.- Appendix I. A Chronological Listing of Peirce’s Papers Directly Bearing upon Induction and Probability.- Appendix II. Proof of the Logical Law of Large Numbers (the Maximum Value Law of Hypergeometric Probability).- Appendix III. Probabilities of Estimates of Values of Population Parameters.- Selected Bibliography.