Philosophy of Religion: Critical Concepts in Philosophy
Editat de William J. Wainwrighten Limba Engleză Hardback – 5 aug 2009
The past forty years or so have witnessed a renaissance in the philosophy of religion. New tools (modal logic, probability theory, and so on) and new historical research have prompted many thinkers to take a fresh look at old topics (God’s existence, the problem of evil, faith and reason, and the like). Moreover, sophisticated examinations of contentious new issues, such as the problem of religious diversity or the role of emotions and other non-evidential factors in shaping rationally held religious beliefs, have also emerged.
Addressing the need for an authoritative reference work to make sense of this rapidly growing and ever more complex corpus of scholarly literature, Philosophy of Religion is a new title in the Routledge Major Works series, Critical Concepts in Philosophy. Edited by a leading scholar, it is a four-volume collection which brings together key examples of the most important recent work, together with carefully selected historical pieces needed to understand them. Volume I focuses on concepts of the divine while Volume II explores arguments for and against the existence of a divine reality, with special attention to the problem of evil, the problem of divine hiddenness, and the case for naturalism. Volume III and the first part of Volume IV are devoted to broadly epistemic issues: the cognitive value of religious experience; the proper role of evidence in the formation of religious belief; the nature of justified religious belief; and pragmatic arguments for religious belief. The remainder of Volume IV introduces some of the best recent work on religious diversity, tolerance, and the public role of religion in a pluralistic society.
The Philosophy of Religion is fully indexed and has a comprehensive introduction, newly written by the editor, which places the material in its historical and intellectual context. It is an essential work of reference and is destined to be valued by scholars and students as a vital one-stop research resource.
Available now at a special introductory price. This price is applicable until 3 months after publication. For more information, please contact us (reference@routledge.com).
Din seria Critical Concepts in Philosophy
- 34%
Preț: 6137.76 lei - 34%
Preț: 6730.65 lei - 34%
Preț: 5899.96 lei - 34%
Preț: 4341.02 lei - 34%
Preț: 4342.23 lei - 34%
Preț: 4489.87 lei - 34%
Preț: 5456.67 lei - 33%
Preț: 1610.24 lei - 34%
Preț: 6143.33 lei - 34%
Preț: 6694.91 lei - 34%
Preț: 4355.62 lei - 35%
Preț: 6100.86 lei - 34%
Preț: 6140.61 lei - 34%
Preț: 3793.21 lei - 34%
Preț: 5880.49 lei - 34%
Preț: 5455.63 lei - 34%
Preț: 6146.69 lei - 34%
Preț: 6147.48 lei - 34%
Preț: 6145.88 lei - 34%
Preț: 7260.15 lei - 34%
Preț: 7253.25 lei - 34%
Preț: 6702.61 lei - 34%
Preț: 5597.50 lei
Preț: 6145.47 lei
Preț vechi: 9362.13 lei
-34% Nou
1176.24€ • 1225.93$ • 979.16£
Comandă specială
Livrare economică 16-30 decembrie
Specificații
ISBN-10: 0415442109
Pagini: 1538
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 2.95 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Critical Concepts in Philosophy
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Public țintă
Postgraduate and UndergraduateCuprins
Volume I
Concepts of God
1. Thomas V. Morris, ‘The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Anselm’, Faith and Philosophy, 1984, 1, 177ߝ87.
2. Paul Griffiths, ‘Buddha and God: A Comparative Study in Ideas about Maximal Greatness’, Journal of Religion, 1989, 69, 502ߝ29.
3. William J. Wainwright, ‘Concepts of God’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2007.
God’s Knowledge
4. Nelson Pike, ‘Divine Omniscience and Voluntary Action’, The Philosophical Review, 1965, 74, 27ߝ46.
5. Alvin Plantinga, ‘On Ockham’s Way Out’, Faith and Philosophy, 1986, 3, 235ߝ69.
6. Thomas P. Flint, ‘The Molinist Account of Providence’, Divine Providence: The Molinist Account (Cornell University Press, 1998), pp. 35ߝ59.
7. Ted A. Warfield, ‘Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom are Compatible’, Nous, 1997, 31, 1, 80ߝ6.
8. Patrick Grim, ‘The Being that Knew Too Much’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2000, 47, 141ߝ54.
God’s Power
9. Nelson Pike, ‘Omnipotence and God’s Ability to Sin’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 1968, 6, 3, 208ߝ16.
10. Peter Geach, ‘Omnipotence’, Philosophy, 1973, 48, 7ߝ20.
11. William L. Rowe, ‘God isn’t Free’, Can God be Free? (Clarendon Press, 2004), pp. 2, 88ߝ91, 104ߝ21, 123ߝ7.
12. William J. Wainwright, ‘Rowe on God’s Freedom and God’s Grace’, Philo, 2005, 8, 1, 12ߝ22.
13. Klaas J. Kraay, ‘Theistic Replies to Rowe’s a Priori Argument for Atheism’, Philo, 2005, 8, 1, 23ߝ37.
God’s ‘Metaphysical’ Attributes
14. Nelson Pike, ‘Is God Timeless’, God and Timelessness (Schocken Books, 1970), pp. 101ߝ17, 121ߝ9.
15. Alvin Plantinga, ‘Divine Simplicity’, Does God Have a Nature? (Marquette University Press, 1980), pp. 28ߝ61.
16. Charles Hartshorne, ‘God as Supreme, Yet Indebted to All’, The Divine Relativity (Yale University Press, 1948), pp. 22ߝ3, 25ߝ6, 42ߝ9.
17. Eleonore Stump and Norman Kretzmann, ‘Eternity, Awareness, and Action’, Faith and Philosophy, 1992, 9, 4, 463ߝ82.
18. William E. Mann, ‘Simplicity and Immutability in God’, International Philosophical Quarterly, 1983, 23, 267ߝ76.
Onto-Theology
19. Jean-Luc Marion, ‘Thomas Aquinas and Onto-theo-logy’, in Michael Kessler and Christian Sheppard (eds.), Mystics: Presence and Aporia (University of Chicago Press, 2003), pp. 38ߝ74.
20. Merold Westphal, ‘Aquinas and Onto-theology’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 2006, 80, 2, 173ߝ91.
Volume II
Arguments for the Existence of God
The Ontological Argument
21. David Lewis, ‘Anselm and Actuality’, Nous, 1970, 4, 175ߝ88.
22. Alvin Plantinga, ‘The Ontological Argument’, God, Freedom and Evil (Harper and Row, 1974), pp. 85ߝ8, 92ߝ112.
23. Peter Van Inwagen, ‘Ontological Arguments’, Nous, 1977, 11, 375ߝ95.
24. Graham Oppy, ‘The Uses of Parody and the Argument’s Value’, Ontological Arguments and Belief in God (Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 179ߝ81, 183ߝ94.
The Cosmological Argument
25. William L. Rowe, ‘Two Criticisms of the Cosmological Argument’, The Monist, 1970, 54, 441ߝ59.
26. William L. Rowe, ‘The Cosmological Argument’, Man and World, 1968, 1, 283ߝ90.
27. Richard Gale and Alexander Pruss, ‘A New Cosmological Argument’, Religious Studies, 1999, 35, 461ߝ76.
28 Graham Oppy, ‘On "A New Cosmological Argument"’, Religious Studies, 2000, 36, 345ߝ53.
29. Kevin Davey and Robert Clifton, ‘Insufficient Reason in the "New Cosmological Argument"’, Religious Studies, 2001, 37, 485ߝ90.
30. Richard Gale and Alexander Pruss, ‘A Response to Oppy and Davey and Clifton’, Religious Studies, 2002, 38, 89ߝ99.
Design Arguments
31. Richard Swinburne, ‘The Argument from the Fine-Tuning of the Universe’, in John Leslie (ed.), Physical Cosmology and Philosophy (Macmillan 1990), pp. 154ߝ73.
32. Peter Van Inwagen, ‘Design Arguments’, Metaphysics (Westview Press, 1993), pp. 134ߝ47.
33. Elliott Sober, ‘The Design Argument’, in William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion (Blackwell, 2005), pp. 117ߝ47.
The Problem of Evil
34. John Hick, ‘The Free Will Defense’, Evil and the God of Love (Harper and Row, 1966), pp. 43ߝ4, 289ߝ95, 369ߝ72, 374ߝ6.
35. Alvin Plantinga, ‘The Free Will Defense’, God, Freedom, and Evil (Harper and Row, 1974), pp. 12ߝ49.
36. Paul Draper, ‘Pain and Pleasure: An Evidential Problem for Theists’, Nous, 1989, 23, 331ߝ50.
37. William L. Rowe, ‘The Evidential Argument from Evil: A Second Look’, in Daniel Howard-Snyder (ed.), The Evidential Argument from Evil (Indiana University Press, 1996), pp. 262ߝ85.
38. Peter Van Inwagen, ‘The Problem of Evil, the Problem of Air, and the Problem of Silence’, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 5: Philosophy of Religion (Ridgeway, 1991), pp. 135ߝ65.
39. Marilyn M. Adams, ‘Redemptive Suffering: A Christian Approach to the Problem of Evil’, in Robert Audi and William J. Wainwright (eds.), Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment (Cornell University Press, 1986), pp. 248ߝ67.
40. Paul Draper, ‘Cosmic Fine-Tuning and Terrestrial Suffering: Parallel Problems for Naturalism and Theism’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 2004, 41, 4, 311ߝ21.
Divine Hiddenness
41. John L. Schellenberg, ‘God’s Hiddenness’, Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason (Cornell University Press, 1993), pp. 2ߝ3, 17ߝ43.
42. William J. Wainwright, ‘Jonathan Edwards and the Hiddenness of God’, in Daniel Howard-Snyder and Paul K. Moser (eds.), Divine Hiddenness: New Essays (Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 98ߝ119.
Volume III
Religious Experience
43. Richard Swinburne, ‘The Argument from Religious Experience’, The Existence of God (Clarendon Press, 1991), pp. 244ߝ9, 254ߝ76.
44. William J. Wainwright, ‘The Cognitive Status of Mystical Experience’, Mysticism: A Study of its Nature, Cognitive Value, and Moral Implications (University of Wisconsin Press, 1981), pp. 82ߝ137.
45. William P. Alston, ‘Is Religious Belief Rational?’, in Stanley M. Harrison and Richard C. Taylor (eds.), The Life of Religion (University Press of America, 1987), pp. 1ߝ15.
46. Richard M. Gale, ‘Religious Experience Arguments’, On the Nature and Existence of God (Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 285ߝ343.
Faith and Reason
47. Nicholas Wolterstorff, ‘The Migration of the Theistic Arguments: From Natural Theology to Evidentialist Apologetics’, in Robert Audi and William J. Wainwright (eds.), Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment (Cornell University Press, 1986), pp. 38ߝ80.
48. Alvin Plantinga, ‘Is Belief in God Properly Basic?’, Nous, 1981, 15, 41ߝ51.
49. Gary Gutting, ‘Proper Basicality’, Religious Belief and Religious Skepticism (University of Notre Dame Press, 1982), pp. 79ߝ92.
50. Alvin Plantinga, ‘Warranted Belief in God’, Warranted Christian Belief (Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 167ߝ92.
51. Basil Mitchell, ‘Cumulative Case Arguments’, The Justification of Religious Belief (Macmillan, 1973), pp. 39ߝ47, 51ߝ3, 59ߝ65, 69ߝ73, 76ߝ82, 85ߝ95, 160ߝ5.
52. William J. Wainwright, ‘Religious Experience, Theological Argument, and Rhetoric’, Faith and Philosophy, 2005, 22, 4, 391ߝ412.
Religious Language
53. William P. Alston, ‘Functionalism and Theological Language’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 1985, 22, 3, 221ߝ30.
54. Paul Ricouer, ‘Philosophy and Religious Language’, The Journal of Religion, 1974, 54, 71ߝ85.
55. Janet Soskice, ‘Metaphor, Reference, and Realism’, Metaphor and Religious Language (Clarendon Press, 1985), pp. 99ߝ104, 107ߝ40, 142ߝ4, 148ߝ59, 173ߝ80.
Volume IV
Pragmatic Arguments for Religious Belief
56. Richard Foley, ‘Pragmatic Reasons for Belief’, in Jeff Jordan (ed.), Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager (Rowman and Littlefield, 1994), pp. 31ߝ46.
57. Ian Hacking, ‘The Logic of Pascal’s Wager’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 1972, 9, 2, 186ߝ92.
58. Anthony Duff, ‘Pascal’s Wager and Infinite Utilities’, Analysis, 1986, 46, 107ߝ9.
59. Alan Hajek, ‘Waging War on Pascal’s Wager’, The Philosophical Review, 2003, 112, 1, 27ߝ56.
60. Jeff Jordan, ‘A Qualified Defense of the Wager’, Pascal’s Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God (Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 73ߝ95, 103ߝ7, 110ߝ20.
61. Philip L. Quinn, ‘Moral Objections to Pascalian Wagering’, in Jeff Jordan (ed.), Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager (Rowman and Littlefield, 1994), pp. 61ߝ81.
Religious Diversity and Rational Religious Belief
62. John Hick, ‘The Pluralistic Hypothesis’, An Interpretation of Religion (Yale University Press, 1989), pp. 233ߝ51, 307ߝ8.
63. Peter Byrne, ‘Religious Pluralism and Religious Reference’, Prolegomena to Religious Pluralism: Reference and Realism in Religion (Macmillan, 1995), pp. 12, 26ߝ8, 33ߝ4, 96ߝ7, 127ߝ30, 140ߝ5, 149ߝ50, 193, 200ߝ3, 205ߝ10.
64. Alvin Plantinga, ‘Pluralism: A Defense of Religious Exclusivism’, in Thomas D. Senor (ed.), The Rationality of Belief and the Plurality of Faith (Cornell University Press, 1995), pp. 191ߝ215.
65. David Basinger, ‘Hick’s Religious Pluralism and "Reformed Epistemology": A Middle Ground’, Faith and Philosophy, 1988, 5, 4, 421ߝ32.
66. William J. Wainwright, ‘Competing Religious Claims’, in William E. Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion (Blackwell, 2005), pp. 220ߝ41.
Tolerance and the Public Role of Religion
67. Jeremy Waldron, ‘Locke: Toleration, and the Rationality of Persecution’, in Susan Mendus (ed.), Justifying Toleration (Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 61ߝ86.
68. Philip L. Quinn, ‘Religious Diversity and Religious Toleration’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2001, 50, 1ߝ3, 57ߝ80.
69. Robert Audi, ‘Liberal Democracy and the Place of Religion in Politics’, in Robert Audi and Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.), Religion in the Public Square (Rowman and Littlefield, 1997), pp. 9ߝ21, 24ߝ37, 50ߝ3.
70. John Rawls, ‘The Idea of Public Reason’, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, 1993), pp. 212ߝ30; 240ߝ4, 247ߝ51.
71. Nicholas Wolterstorff, ‘Audi on Religion, Politics, and Liberal Democracy’, in Robert Audi and Nicholas Wolterstorff (eds.), Religion in the Public Square (Rowman and Littlefield, 1997), pp. 151ߝ60.
72. Nicholas Wolterstorff, ‘Why We Should Reject What Liberalism Tells Us’, in Paul J. Weithman (ed.), Religion and Contemporary Liberalism (University of Notre Dame Press, 1997), pp. 162ߝ81.