Physical Descriptions, Biometrics, and Eikonographia in Graeco-Roman Papyri from Egypt: Harvard Egyptological Studies, cartea 24
Autor Ella Kareven Limba Engleză Hardback – 13 dec 2024
Din seria Harvard Egyptological Studies
- 18% Preț: 808.07 lei
- 49% Preț: 963.23 lei
- 18% Preț: 1084.91 lei
- 18% Preț: 1089.85 lei
- 18% Preț: 1060.19 lei
- 18% Preț: 768.52 lei
- 18% Preț: 1168.95 lei
- 18% Preț: 743.80 lei
- 18% Preț: 1000.87 lei
- 18% Preț: 733.91 lei
- 18% Preț: 633.21 lei
- 18% Preț: 796.69 lei
- 18% Preț: 1043.88 lei
- 18% Preț: 795.61 lei
- 18% Preț: 861.88 lei
- 18% Preț: 877.18 lei
- 18% Preț: 1268.18 lei
- 18% Preț: 870.77 lei
- 18% Preț: 1327.15 lei
- 18% Preț: 572.51 lei
Preț: 581.10 lei
Preț vechi: 708.66 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 872
Preț estimativ în valută:
111.20€ • 116.96$ • 92.91£
111.20€ • 116.96$ • 92.91£
Carte nepublicată încă
Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:
Se trimite...
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9789004544802
ISBN-10: 9004544801
Pagini: 227
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill
Seria Harvard Egyptological Studies
ISBN-10: 9004544801
Pagini: 227
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill
Seria Harvard Egyptological Studies
Notă biografică
Ella Karev, Ph.D. (2022), University of Chicago, is a Senior Lecturer in Egyptology at Tel Aviv University. She is a social and economic historian of Egypt whose research focuses on enslavement as well as Greek, Aramaic, Coptic, and Demotic papyrology.
Cuprins
Preface and Acknowledgements
List of Tables
Abbreviations
1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Scope
1.3 A brief note on terminology
1.4 The corpus of texts
1.5 Previous scholarship
1.6Eikones in Demotic and Latin
1.7Eikones outside of Egypt
1.8 Outline
1.9 Abbreviations and conventions
2 Identity verification, biometrics, and documentality
2.1 Biometrics, identity, and eikones
2.2 Biometrics and anthropometry
2.3 Documentality
2.4 The role of social trust
2.5 Conclusions and implications
3 Descriptive eikones
3.1 The Ptolemaic period: detailed physical description
3.2 Characteristics in the Ptolemaic eikōn
3.3 Absent characteristics and perception of physical traits
3.4 Comparison with artistic evidence
3.5 Demotic eikones
3.6 Conclusions
4 Oulai
4.1 The Roman period: identification by oulē
4.2 The format of the oulē-eikōn
4.3 Why not a scar?
4.4 Location of oulai on the body
4.5 Moles
4.6 “Unmarked” and “well-Marked”
4.7 Descriptive eikones in the Roman period
4.8 Conclusions: oulē as “identifier”
5 Impairments and disabilities
5.1 Impairment as identification
5.2 Types, frequency, and distribution of impairments
5.3 Distribution by Occupation and Gender
5.4 Impairments absent from the eikones
5.5 Impairment as an oulē
5.6 Comparison with artistic depictions and physical remains
5.7 Implications of impairments in the eikones
6 Ethnonyms, ethnicity, and race
6.1 The inclusion of ethnonyms in the eikones
6.2 Ethnonyms, geonyms, and “legal ethnic designations”
6.3 Ethnonyms of unenslaved persons
6.4 Ethnonyms of enslaved persons
6.5 Skin colour, race, and ethnicity
6.6 Conclusions
7 Enslaved persons
7.1 Enslaved persons in the corpus of eikones
7.2 Terminology
7.3 Characteristics of the eikones of enslaved persons
7.4 Enslaved eikones and social alienation
7.5 Typology of enslaved eikones
7.6 Distribution of texts by type
7.7 Conclusions
8 Conclusions
8.1 Findings
8.2 Ptolemaic descriptive eikones in contrast with Roman oulē-eikones
8.3 The eikones as a biometric system of documentary identification
8.4 Descriptions of enslaved persons
8.5 Observations on impairments
8.6 Race and ethnicity
8.7 Conclusions and future research
Appendix
Bibliography
Index
List of Tables
Abbreviations
1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Scope
1.3 A brief note on terminology
1.4 The corpus of texts
1.5 Previous scholarship
1.6Eikones in Demotic and Latin
1.7Eikones outside of Egypt
1.8 Outline
1.9 Abbreviations and conventions
2 Identity verification, biometrics, and documentality
2.1 Biometrics, identity, and eikones
2.2 Biometrics and anthropometry
2.3 Documentality
2.4 The role of social trust
2.5 Conclusions and implications
3 Descriptive eikones
3.1 The Ptolemaic period: detailed physical description
3.2 Characteristics in the Ptolemaic eikōn
3.3 Absent characteristics and perception of physical traits
3.4 Comparison with artistic evidence
3.5 Demotic eikones
3.6 Conclusions
4 Oulai
4.1 The Roman period: identification by oulē
4.2 The format of the oulē-eikōn
4.3 Why not a scar?
4.4 Location of oulai on the body
4.5 Moles
4.6 “Unmarked” and “well-Marked”
4.7 Descriptive eikones in the Roman period
4.8 Conclusions: oulē as “identifier”
5 Impairments and disabilities
5.1 Impairment as identification
5.2 Types, frequency, and distribution of impairments
5.3 Distribution by Occupation and Gender
5.4 Impairments absent from the eikones
5.5 Impairment as an oulē
5.6 Comparison with artistic depictions and physical remains
5.7 Implications of impairments in the eikones
6 Ethnonyms, ethnicity, and race
6.1 The inclusion of ethnonyms in the eikones
6.2 Ethnonyms, geonyms, and “legal ethnic designations”
6.3 Ethnonyms of unenslaved persons
6.4 Ethnonyms of enslaved persons
6.5 Skin colour, race, and ethnicity
6.6 Conclusions
7 Enslaved persons
7.1 Enslaved persons in the corpus of eikones
7.2 Terminology
7.3 Characteristics of the eikones of enslaved persons
7.4 Enslaved eikones and social alienation
7.5 Typology of enslaved eikones
7.6 Distribution of texts by type
7.7 Conclusions
8 Conclusions
8.1 Findings
8.2 Ptolemaic descriptive eikones in contrast with Roman oulē-eikones
8.3 The eikones as a biometric system of documentary identification
8.4 Descriptions of enslaved persons
8.5 Observations on impairments
8.6 Race and ethnicity
8.7 Conclusions and future research
Appendix
Bibliography
Index