Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus: Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy

Autor Nicholas Rescher
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 13 sep 1995
Nicholas Rescher presents a critical reaction against two currently influential tendencies of thought. On the one hand, he rejects the facile relativism that pervades contemporary social and academic life. On the other hand, he opposes the rationalism inherent in new-contractarian theory - both in the idealized communicative-contract version promoted in continental European political philosophy by Jurgen Habermas, and in the idealized social-contract version of the theory promoted in the Anglo-American context by John Rawls.Against such tendencies, Professor Rescher's pluralist approach takes a more realistic and pragmatic line, eschewing the convenient recourse of idealization in cognitive and practical matters. Instead of a utopianism that looks to a uniquely perfect order that would prevail under ideal conditions, he advocates incremental improvements within the framework or arrangements that none of us will deem perfect but that all of us 'can live with'. Such an approach replaces the yearning tor an unattainable consensus with the institution of pragmatic arrangements in which the community will acquiesce - not through agreeing on their optimality, but through a shared recognition among the dissonant parties that the available options are even worse.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy

Preț: 37667 lei

Preț vechi: 49947 lei
-25% Nou

Puncte Express: 565

Preț estimativ în valută:
7209 7605$ 6008£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 23-28 decembrie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780198236016
ISBN-10: 0198236018
Pagini: 216
Ilustrații: line figures, tables
Dimensiuni: 138 x 215 x 13 mm
Greutate: 0.28 kg
Ediția:Revised
Editura: OUP OXFORD
Colecția OUP Oxford
Seria Clarendon Library of Logic and Philosophy

Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Recenzii

Rescher provides a cogent and sustained attack on the thesis that consensus is necessary and sufficient and desirable for rationality, truth, communication, cooperation, and social order. He also offers a powerful argument in favor of dissensus ... Highly recommended for all libraries.