Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Responsibility as Paradox: A Critique of Rational Discourse on Government: Rethinking Public Administration, cartea 1

Autor Michael M. Harmon
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 27 iun 1995
Exploring the concept of responsible government and administration, this book creates a new paradigm for looking at the issue. Michael M Harmon rejects the current predominant `rationalist' theory, which holds that responsibility involves an intractable conflict between the potential free will of an actor and the restrictions of the institution within which the actor operates. He suggests that public administration must undergo a paradigm shift in which institutional restrictions and individual free will create a healthy and dynamic tension and are not completely incompatible.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Rethinking Public Administration

Preț: 54423 lei

Preț vechi: 64027 lei
-15% Nou

Puncte Express: 816

Preț estimativ în valută:
10417 10923$ 8607£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 30 ianuarie-13 februarie 25

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780803970083
ISBN-10: 0803970080
Pagini: 245
Dimensiuni: 154 x 229 x 16 mm
Greutate: 0.41 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: SAGE Publications
Colecția Sage Publications, Inc
Seria Rethinking Public Administration

Locul publicării:Thousand Oaks, United States

Cuprins

Foreword - Bayard L Catron
Series Editor's Introduction - Henry D Kass
Introduction
Three Meanings of Responsibility
Agency, Accountability, and Obligation
The Rationalist Conception of Responsible Government
Paradox and Personal Responsibility
The Paradox of Obligation
The Paradox of Agency
The Paradox of Accountability
Conclusion
Rationalism and the Paradox of Courage

Descriere

Exploring the concept of responsible government and administration, this book creates a new paradigm for looking at the issue. Michael M Harmon rejects the current predominant `rationalist' theory, which holds that responsibility involves an intractable conflict between the potential free will of an actor and the restrictions of the institution within which the actor operates. He suggests that public administration must undergo a paradigm shift in which institutional restrictions and individual free will create a healthy and dynamic tension and are not completely incompatible.