Responsibility, Restoration and Fault suggests how we could measure responsible behaviour. What criteria do our actions have to abide by to protect individuals and society? This is particularly relevant in a period where modern technology has not only multiplied the risks and degree of damage, but also created long causal chains that often make it difficult to see a connection between action and damage, such as when the damaging effects on individuals or society only emerge decades later. The author argues that a person's behaviour is responsible if the following criteria are fulfilled simultaneously: (i) the person, whose behaviour could cause damage, would be able to restore the victim; (ii) the person, whose behaviour causes actual damage, restores the victim (both, criteria of restoration); and (iii) the person is not at fault when determining and executing an act (criteria of fault). With its historical and legal philosophical perspective responsibility, Restoration and Fault is a must read for every lawyer. Subject: Legal Philosophy, Legal Theory]