Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Revisiting the Law of Occupation: Nova et Vetera Iuris Gentium, cartea 30

Autor Hanne Cuyckens
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 8 noi 2017
In Revisiting the Law of Occupation, Hanne Cuyckens assesses the crucial challenges faced by the law of occupation. Through examples such as the occupation of the Palestinian Territories and the 2003 occupation of Iraq, the author convincingly demonstrates that although the law of occupation may no longer be perceived as adequate to address contemporary forms of occupation, a formal modification of the law is neither desirable nor feasible. The author identifies means by which the potential dichotomy between the law and the facts can be addressed without formal modification of the former: 1) flexible interpretation of the law itself; 2) the role of International Human Rights law as gap-filler; and 3) the role of the UNSC as a modulator of the law.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Nova et Vetera Iuris Gentium

Preț: 83508 lei

Preț vechi: 101838 lei
-18% Nou

Puncte Express: 1253

Preț estimativ în valută:
15987 16618$ 13255£

Carte indisponibilă temporar

Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9789004346505
ISBN-10: 9004346503
Pagini: 288
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 x 20 mm
Greutate: 0.59 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria Nova et Vetera Iuris Gentium


Cuprins

Acknowledgments
List of Abbreviations
Introduction

Part 1: The Law of Occupation and Current Challenges


Introduction to Part 1
1 Occupation: A Conceptual Analysis
1 The Concept of Occupation
1.1The Modern Concept of Occupation is the Product of a Long Evolution Process
1.2The Determination of a Situation of Occupation is a Factual Assessment
1.3Definition: The Effective Control Test
1.4“Even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance”
1.5The Occupation of Territory the Title to Which is Not Clear and Uncontested
1.6The Beginning of Occupation: The Invasion vs Occupation Phase
1.7End of Occupation
2 Main Characteristics of the Law of Occupation
2.1Occupation Does Not Confer Title
2.2Occupation Cannot Alter the status quo ante
2.3Occupation is a Provisional State of Affairs
3 The Occupation vs. United Nations Territorial Administration Debate: A Question of Consent?
3.1United Nations Territorial Administration vs. Occupation: A Conceptual Comparative Analysis
3.2Applicability of ihl to un Troops: A Prerequisite for the Potential Applicability of the Law of Occupation
3.3Applicability of the Law of Occupation
3.4Interim Conclusion: Lessons to be Learned from the Law of Occupation for un Territorial Administration?

2 Current Challenges to the Law of Occupation
1 Challenges Induced by the Changing Social and International Environment
2 Specific Challenges Generated by Contemporary Forms of Occupation
2.1Long-term Occupation
2.2Transformative Occupation
3 Interim Conclusion: Insurmountable Challenges?

Part 2: Addressing the Challenges Faced by the Law of Occupation


Introduction to Part 2
1 The Flexibility in the Law of Occupation Itself
1 The Manifestation of the Conservationist Principle in the Law of Occupation: A General Overview
2 Article 43 of the Hague Regulations and Article 64 gciv: Definition and Delimitation of the Occupying Power’s Authority
2.1Article 43 of the Hague Regulations: A Key Provision of the Law of Occupation
2.2Article 64 gciv: A Further Specification of the Rule Contained in Article 43 of the Hague Regulations
2.3The Adopted Measures Should Not Only be in Accordance with Article 43 hr and Article 64 gciv but Should Also be Proportional
3 The Law of Occupation: Flexible Enough to Encompass Change, Even in Long-term Occupation?
3.1Prolonged Occupation: Affecting the Balance between the status quo and Change
3.2Flexibility vs. Protection: How to Find the Correct Balance and Prevent Abuse?
4 Interim Conclusion: Some Inherent Flexibility within the Law of Occupation Itself

2 International Human Rights Law as a ‘gap-filler’
1 Comparison between Both Bodies of Law: Differences and Similarities
2 Applicability of International Human Rights Law to Situations of Occupation
2.1Applicability ratione loci: The Question of the Extraterritorial Application of International Human Rights Obligations
2.2Applicability ratione materiae
3 The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Occupation
3.1A Preliminary Analysis of the Relationship
3.2Trying to Establish the Specific Relation between Both Bodies of Law: Elements Influencing the Relationship
3.3Conclusion on the Relationship between ihl and ihrl in Situations of Occupation
4 Interim Conclusion: International Human Rights Law Can to a Certain Extent Play an Important Role as a Gap-filler

3 The United Nations Security Council as a ‘modulator’ of the Law of Occupation
1 Powers of the United Nations Security Council under Chapter vii 201
2 An Assessment of the Situation in Iraq: Coexistence between the Law of Occupation and a un ‘mandate’
2.1The Situation in Iraq under ihl
2.2Role of the un Security Council in the Occupation in Iraq
3 Interim Conclusion: A Compelling Case for Modulation of the Law of Occupation by the unsc When Necessary

General Concluding Remarks
Bibliography

Notă biografică

Hanne Cuyckens obtained her PhD degree at Leuven University in 2015 and was an Assistant Professor of international law at Utrecht University from September 2015 to August 2017. She has published many articles on issues relating to international law and EU external relations. Her most recent publication dealt with the legal status of the Gaza Strip.