We have been taught, by most of society, that science has proven that there can be no God. That is nonsense - this is just a belief, even a Dogma of science, but it is not possible to use science to discuss the presence of a God. That sort of thing was assumed out when Traditional Science was born almost four centuries ago, and for good reason. There was way too much to do in the study of mass and energy - besides no one knew how to measure a thought, an emotion, a belief, etc., way back then. Although we now know how to measure brain changes when we experience such things, we still do not know how to actually measure any of these 'pure information' processes as such. If we are going to do something well, we must first establish a sound foundation. Listing all of our explicit (openly stated) assumptions and also finding out our implicit (implied, but not yet openly stated) assumptions is critical. Study of the history of science shows that this has not yet been well. Some really important work is needed here. So far much of science has been built upon shifting sand. Ever since the great discoveries of the early 1900s, where it became obvious that emotional thoughts could really influence the state of waves and particles, then the reality of probability at the foundation of matter, changes should have been made in how we taught ourselves about science. When Einstein showed us that mass and energy were just two states of the same thing, more changes in teaching about the founding assumptions of interactions was needed. When he then showed us (proven by others) that gravity distorted space, even more interactions came to light. In just about every field of science, new interactions are showing up all of the time. The supposed of leaders of scientific societies have responded by making the impossibility of some interactions a definite Dogma that cannot be discussed, let alone questioned. The study of Philosophy, within which the spirituality of Religions is found, has been seriously damaged by most experts trying to use the logical processes of science in a field that is all about non-logical processes. Logic can be a minor tool here, when you start studying thoughts, emotions, out-of-body experiences, belief processes and effects, etc. In the Far East, some gurus and avatars are doing totally non-logical things, but that is not being properly studied, because these things are non-logical and cannot be true, therefore cannot be studied. This latter choice is certainly anti-science, but is pervasive in many fields worthy of study. If it is supposedly not true, than that should be shown to be a newly-defined reality. Only when theology, as well as philosophy as a whole, start to use non-logical processes to study the field of non-logical processes will we see huge strides in this area. We are spiritual beings having a human experience. This human journey will bring us lessons to be learned as we grow in understanding, and action, in our destined quest towards our Divine Creator (who we call God, Allah, Jehovah, etc). We humans seem to have a very powerful need to understand both Who we are and Why we are here, although that has largely been trained out of us, even on our parent's knee. In the end, however, we will have to find out and follow our path to The Way that will help us grow spiritually. In the end, Destiny will win out This small book is meant to stir up the interest of readers who are starting to wonder about these critical 'Who we are' and 'Why we are here' questions. It is written by a student, for other students. We humans are evolving from the thinking but fearful Homo sapiens species into the loving Homo spiritus species. Learning how to truly Love demands an answer to these great questions. The time to start on your journey is NOW