Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Scientific Peer Review: Guidelines for Informative Peer Review: essentials

Autor J. Matthias Starck
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 24 oct 2017
J. Matthias Starck comprehensively guides the reader in this essential through all steps of writing an expert review for a scientific journal. It is built on a succinct analysis how science works, how science is communicated and how science is published. It provides a critical guide how to write good, informative and fair peer reviews. The author presents a critical discussion of different peer review procedures and their alternatives, explains ethical guidelines as well as the dark sides of scientific publishing. So this essential helps the reader to perform better in the existing system and to contribute to its further development and improvement.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria essentials

Preț: 12349 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 185

Preț estimativ în valută:
2363 2420$ 1966£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 18 martie-01 aprilie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9783658199142
ISBN-10: 3658199148
Pagini: 59
Ilustrații: IX, 59 p.
Dimensiuni: 148 x 210 mm
Greutate: 0.1 kg
Ediția:1st ed. 2017
Editura: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Colecția Springer Spektrum
Seria essentials

Locul publicării:Wiesbaden, Germany

Cuprins

Essence of Scientific Communication.- Why Peer Review?.- Responsibilities of the Reviewer and Ethical Rules in the Reviewing Process.- Critique and Variations of the Journal Peer Reviewing Process.- Reviewer Recognition.- Institutions and Committees/Recommendations in Conflict.

Notă biografică

Prof. Dr. J. Matthias Starck is Professor of Zoology, Department Biology II, at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.

Textul de pe ultima copertă

J. Matthias Starck comprehensively guides the reader in this essential through all steps of writing an expert review for a scientific journal. It is built on a succinct analysis how science works, how science is communicated and how science is published. It provides a critical guide how to write good, informative and fair peer reviews. The author presents a critical discussion of different peer review procedures and their alternatives, explains ethical guidelines as well as the dark sides of scientific publishing. So this essential helps the reader to perform better in the existing system and to contribute to its further development and improvement.

Contents
  • Essence of Scientific Communication
  • Why Peer Review?
  • Responsibilities of the Reviewer and Ethical Rules in the Reviewing Process
  • Critique and Variations of the Journal Peer Reviewing Process
  • Reviewer Recognition
  • Institutions and Committees/Recommendations in Conflict
Target Groups
  • Advanced PhD students and postdocs from biomedical research and natural science fields who received their first peer review requests and now seek advice and guidance
  • Researchers from all fields of science and all degrees of experience who wish to improve and develop their methodological approach to peer review
The Author
Prof. Dr. J. Matthias Starck is Professor of Zoology, Department Biology II, at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.

Caracteristici

A short analysis of basic principles how science works, how science is communicated, and how it is published A comprehensive presentation of how to write a review for a scientific journal A discussion of ethical guidelines applicable in scientific publishing An analysis and critique of various peer review procedures Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras