Although Seneca's" De Ira" has long been considered a standard Stoic approach to anger in dialogue form, its structure more closely approximates that of an epistle. The prevalence of legal terminology as well as numerous and recurrent legal contexts suggest that Seneca used the Epistolary "Responsum" of the jurisconsults as his model instead of the philosophical dialogue. Seneca's criticism of the delict "Iniuria" in a legal genre disguised as a Stoic moral essay parodies the" Responsum" and, as a consequence, effectively reveals law as a convenient pretext and source of a social ill it purports to remedy.