Sharing the Burden: The Armenian Question, Humanitarian Intervention, and Anglo-American Visions of Global Order: Oxford Studies in International History
Autor Charlie Ladermanen Limba Engleză Hardback – 5 noi 2019
Preț: 511.19 lei
Preț vechi: 587.98 lei
-13% Nou
Puncte Express: 767
Preț estimativ în valută:
97.86€ • 101.87$ • 80.56£
97.86€ • 101.87$ • 80.56£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 20-27 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780190618605
ISBN-10: 0190618604
Pagini: 300
Ilustrații: 15 halftones
Dimensiuni: 163 x 236 x 28 mm
Greutate: 0.59 kg
Editura: Oxford University Press
Colecția OUP USA
Seria Oxford Studies in International History
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 0190618604
Pagini: 300
Ilustrații: 15 halftones
Dimensiuni: 163 x 236 x 28 mm
Greutate: 0.59 kg
Editura: Oxford University Press
Colecția OUP USA
Seria Oxford Studies in International History
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Recenzii
This extraordinary and powerful book on the Armenian question addresses a long neglected issue, one perceived at the time as being of great significance to US foreign policy in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Based on massive archival research in US, British, French, and Armenian primary and secondary sources, this is a systematic, judicious, and elegantly presented volume. ... Besides excavating the details of the specific questions and issues arising from the case of Armenia, Laderman's comprehensive and wide-ranging study illuminates the implications for broader debates over the scope and limits of the global US role.
A tremendous volume. The sheer amount of research that went into the book is staggering, and Laderman's interpretations of the data are fresh and provocative. Readers will learn much about the Armenian question. They will also discover broader revelations about U.S. foreign relations in the book, challenging not just the history they know, but how history can be told.
Laderman makes a persuasive case that the Armenian question weighed heavily on the minds of official and non-governmental actors within the British and American empires. Going forward, historians of Gilded Age and Progressive Era Anglo-American relations, imperialism, and humanitarianism will need to grapple with the Armenian question with Sharing the Burden as the new starting point.
A thoroughly researched and highly compelling account of how the Armenian question acted as a catalyst for an emerging American-British geopolitical alliance and the United States' rise as a predominant actor in the international arena....[A] truly visionary presentation of the Armenian question as a precursor for the future dilemmas of humanitarian intervention in general and of American global leadership in particular....The book will remain an essential read for current and future American policymakers as they reflect on their personal leadership's potential and limitations, the factors driving their nation's willingness to engage the world, and the risks that come with 'sharing the burden' of international leadership and humanitarian intervention.
A fascinating and thoroughly assured work of international political history....With immense skill, Laderman weaves together numerous strands, including transatlantic relations, the politics of intervention, the role of missionaries, the rise of the US as a global power, various international and historical contexts, and World War I. Sharing the Burden is highly topical and immensely stimulating.
By analysing a series of episodes many today have forgotten about, Laderman...reminds us that the dilemmas of humanitarian intervention that have bedevilled policymakers in recent decades are, in fact, not new problems at all....He persuasively argues that the 'Armenian question' is intimately tied up with the rise of the United States as a world power....The next time American leaders consider such an intervention, they would be wise to read Laderman's impressive book.
Laderman's persuasive and readable history has implications for the present day. The congressional resolutions last fall were, largely, a rebuke of Turkey for its current invasion of northern SyriaCongressional resolutions are very welcome, but history suggests that these Christians should not expect much more from America. Just as in the last century, despite the best intentions, America's commitment to Christians in the Middle East today is limited: well wishes, exhortations for equality and tolerance, some humanitarian assistance-though nothing like the massive humanitarian campaign that took place in the last century and saved so many lives....The sad lesson of Laderman's book is this: if Christians in Syria expect the American government to do more to help them, they will find themselves on their own
When -- if ever -- should liberal democratic States intervene abroad to stop atrocities and abuses of basic human rights, even when they have the power to do so? The problem of humanitarian intervention is no recent one, as Charlie Laderman shows in his incisive and empathetic study of the widely-covered Turkish atrocities against the Armenians. Again and again, leading US statesmen and opinion-makers considered the tempting possibility of 'sharing the burden,' of joint Anglo-American actions to rescue the desperate Armenians. Yet it was not to be. This is superb political and diplomatic history, with a sobering message for policy-makers and pundits today.
In the early twentieth century, Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson believed it their duty as statesmen to prevent further killings of Armenian Christians, eventually reckoned at 1.5 million. Sharing the Burden is an invaluable account of reactions by missionaries, as well as the US and British governments, to genocide.
A compelling and beautifully-written history of the centrality of the Armenian question in trans-Atlantic politics before and after the Great War. No other book gives humanitarianism in foreign policy making its due in this period using extensive archival research placed in the context of global history.
Anyone interested in US foreign relations during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era should read this important book. Focusing on the international politics of humanitarian intervention in the Ottoman Empire to aid the Armenians, Laderman provides new insights into the promise and failure of the League of Nations and its mandate system to create a new world order after World War I.
Charlie Laderman does an outstanding job showing how humanitarian and religious outrage at the Armenian massacres set the stage for American intervention in the Cuban war for independence from Spain and presaged America shaping the international order in the twentieth century. Sharing the Burden is an essential read for understanding the importance of shared values in American and British foreign policy.
A tremendous volume. The sheer amount of research that went into the book is staggering, and Laderman's interpretations of the data are fresh and provocative. Readers will learn much about the Armenian question. They will also discover broader revelations about U.S. foreign relations in the book, challenging not just the history they know, but how history can be told.
Laderman makes a persuasive case that the Armenian question weighed heavily on the minds of official and non-governmental actors within the British and American empires. Going forward, historians of Gilded Age and Progressive Era Anglo-American relations, imperialism, and humanitarianism will need to grapple with the Armenian question with Sharing the Burden as the new starting point.
A thoroughly researched and highly compelling account of how the Armenian question acted as a catalyst for an emerging American-British geopolitical alliance and the United States' rise as a predominant actor in the international arena....[A] truly visionary presentation of the Armenian question as a precursor for the future dilemmas of humanitarian intervention in general and of American global leadership in particular....The book will remain an essential read for current and future American policymakers as they reflect on their personal leadership's potential and limitations, the factors driving their nation's willingness to engage the world, and the risks that come with 'sharing the burden' of international leadership and humanitarian intervention.
A fascinating and thoroughly assured work of international political history....With immense skill, Laderman weaves together numerous strands, including transatlantic relations, the politics of intervention, the role of missionaries, the rise of the US as a global power, various international and historical contexts, and World War I. Sharing the Burden is highly topical and immensely stimulating.
By analysing a series of episodes many today have forgotten about, Laderman...reminds us that the dilemmas of humanitarian intervention that have bedevilled policymakers in recent decades are, in fact, not new problems at all....He persuasively argues that the 'Armenian question' is intimately tied up with the rise of the United States as a world power....The next time American leaders consider such an intervention, they would be wise to read Laderman's impressive book.
Laderman's persuasive and readable history has implications for the present day. The congressional resolutions last fall were, largely, a rebuke of Turkey for its current invasion of northern SyriaCongressional resolutions are very welcome, but history suggests that these Christians should not expect much more from America. Just as in the last century, despite the best intentions, America's commitment to Christians in the Middle East today is limited: well wishes, exhortations for equality and tolerance, some humanitarian assistance-though nothing like the massive humanitarian campaign that took place in the last century and saved so many lives....The sad lesson of Laderman's book is this: if Christians in Syria expect the American government to do more to help them, they will find themselves on their own
When -- if ever -- should liberal democratic States intervene abroad to stop atrocities and abuses of basic human rights, even when they have the power to do so? The problem of humanitarian intervention is no recent one, as Charlie Laderman shows in his incisive and empathetic study of the widely-covered Turkish atrocities against the Armenians. Again and again, leading US statesmen and opinion-makers considered the tempting possibility of 'sharing the burden,' of joint Anglo-American actions to rescue the desperate Armenians. Yet it was not to be. This is superb political and diplomatic history, with a sobering message for policy-makers and pundits today.
In the early twentieth century, Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson believed it their duty as statesmen to prevent further killings of Armenian Christians, eventually reckoned at 1.5 million. Sharing the Burden is an invaluable account of reactions by missionaries, as well as the US and British governments, to genocide.
A compelling and beautifully-written history of the centrality of the Armenian question in trans-Atlantic politics before and after the Great War. No other book gives humanitarianism in foreign policy making its due in this period using extensive archival research placed in the context of global history.
Anyone interested in US foreign relations during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era should read this important book. Focusing on the international politics of humanitarian intervention in the Ottoman Empire to aid the Armenians, Laderman provides new insights into the promise and failure of the League of Nations and its mandate system to create a new world order after World War I.
Charlie Laderman does an outstanding job showing how humanitarian and religious outrage at the Armenian massacres set the stage for American intervention in the Cuban war for independence from Spain and presaged America shaping the international order in the twentieth century. Sharing the Burden is an essential read for understanding the importance of shared values in American and British foreign policy.
Notă biografică
Charlie Laderman is a Lecturer in International History in the Department of War Studies at King's College London.