Symbolism and Regime Change in Russia
Autor Graeme Gillen Limba Engleză Hardback – 16 ian 2013
Preț: 347.66 lei
Preț vechi: 417.65 lei
-17% Nou
Puncte Express: 521
Preț estimativ în valută:
66.53€ • 69.97$ • 55.59£
66.53€ • 69.97$ • 55.59£
Carte indisponibilă temporar
Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:
Se trimite...
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781107031395
ISBN-10: 1107031397
Pagini: 326
Ilustrații: 13 tables
Dimensiuni: 158 x 235 x 17 mm
Greutate: 0.52 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 1107031397
Pagini: 326
Ilustrații: 13 tables
Dimensiuni: 158 x 235 x 17 mm
Greutate: 0.52 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Cuprins
1. Symbolism and regime change; 2. Dissolution of the Soviet metanarrative; 3. The leader's vision; 4. The symbolism of the political arena; 5. Russian identity in the public arena; 6. Moscow: a material basis for post-Soviet identity?; Conclusion: the difficulties of a post-Soviet narrative.
Recenzii
'How does a country see itself and make sense of its past and place in the world? In this groundbreaking book, Graeme Gill builds on his earlier work on Symbols and Legitimacy in Soviet Politics to take the story into the post-Soviet era. The fall of communism entailed not only institutional change but a drastic transformation of the symbolic universe, accompanied by the formation of new narrative structures and attempts to reshape the physical environment. This book is an original and thought-provoking study of how contemporary Russia sees itself and tries to shape how it should be seen.' Richard Sakwa, University of Kent
'Gill provides a welcome shift in the focus of post-communist politics, away from the conflicts over property and patronage to the struggle over a new form of symbolic discourse. Every nation needs a convincing mythology of its identity and history, yet contemporary Russian elites have been unable to replace the Soviet meta-narrative with a suitable alternative, in part because of the population's own ambiguous attitude to the past. Where traditional works examine the consolidation of democracy (or authoritarianism) in Russia, Gill reminds us that an even more pressing task is the consolidation of a coherent national narrative, without which the regime's legitimacy will remain suspect.' Eugene Huskey, William R. Kenan, Jr Professor of Political Science, Stetson University, and author of Presidential Power in Russia
'A fresh and compelling reading of the post-Soviet experience, organised around an examination of the attempt to construct a substitute for the 'metanarrative' that was dominant in earlier years. That means much more than leadership statements and official documents - for the purposes of this analysis, it extends to language, physical environment and complex issues of 'identity' as well as reinterpretations of the historical record. This will be an influential interpretation; it may be a paradigm-changing one.' Stephen White, University of Glasgow
'Gill provides a welcome shift in the focus of post-communist politics, away from the conflicts over property and patronage to the struggle over a new form of symbolic discourse. Every nation needs a convincing mythology of its identity and history, yet contemporary Russian elites have been unable to replace the Soviet meta-narrative with a suitable alternative, in part because of the population's own ambiguous attitude to the past. Where traditional works examine the consolidation of democracy (or authoritarianism) in Russia, Gill reminds us that an even more pressing task is the consolidation of a coherent national narrative, without which the regime's legitimacy will remain suspect.' Eugene Huskey, William R. Kenan, Jr Professor of Political Science, Stetson University, and author of Presidential Power in Russia
'A fresh and compelling reading of the post-Soviet experience, organised around an examination of the attempt to construct a substitute for the 'metanarrative' that was dominant in earlier years. That means much more than leadership statements and official documents - for the purposes of this analysis, it extends to language, physical environment and complex issues of 'identity' as well as reinterpretations of the historical record. This will be an influential interpretation; it may be a paradigm-changing one.' Stephen White, University of Glasgow
Notă biografică
Descriere
Asks why regime change in Russia has not been accompanied by a coherent new political symbolism.