Cantitate/Preț
Produs

The Court of Justice of the European Union: Rule of Law Guardian for the Public Health Derogation: Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law, cartea 23

Autor Kate Shaw
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 21 dec 2022
In an era of Covid 19, The Court of Justice of the European Union explores the extent to which the CJEU can realise a powerful role as guardian of the EU’s rule of law in a public health emergency. Drawing on an extensive literature review, The Court of Justice of the European Union argues the CJEU can realise such a role by anchoring a structured rule of law review in its reasoning when considering the exercise by the Member States of the public health derogation. Both the legal reasoning of the CJEU during the Covid 19 public health emergency and its aftermath, as well as the related challenges to the EU’s rule of law, are legally and politically of intense interest to legal academics, legal practitioners, policy makers and students.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law

Preț: 74842 lei

Preț vechi: 91270 lei
-18% Nou

Puncte Express: 1123

Preț estimativ în valută:
14328 14893$ 11879£

Carte indisponibilă temporar

Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9789004509801
ISBN-10: 9004509801
Pagini: 200
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law


Notă biografică

Kate Farrant Shaw Ph.D. (2015), Brunel University, is a Rule of law and legal history academic. She was also a former Senior Law Lecturer at Leeds Beckett University and legal officer at H.M. Attorney General’s Chambers, Isle of Man.

Cuprins

1Introduction and Overview
1 Introduction

2 Introduction to the cjeu and Its Unique Method of Interpretation for Interpreting Framework Treaties

3 The cjeu and the Use of Proportionality as a Useful Tool When Reviewing Expulsion Measures for an EU Citizen on Imperative Grounds of Public Security in Tsakouridis
3.1Introduction

3.2Article 45(2) teu, Article 27 Directive 2004/38 and Expulsion of an EU Citizen on Imperative Grounds of Public Security

3.3The cjeu and the Use of Proportionality When Reviewing the Expulsion of an EU Citizen on Imperative Grounds of Public Security in Tsakouridis


4 Chapter Overview

5 Conclusion


2Theoretical Perspectives – The Symbolic Importance of the EU’s Rule of Law
1 Introduction

2 The Rule of Law a Widely Acknowledged Legitimating Symbol of Importance

3 The EU’s Rule of Law as a Quintessential Treaty Value of Importance

4 The cjeu and Taking on the Role of Guardian of the EU’s Rule of Law Standards

5 Conclusion


3A Clear and Present Danger? Time for a Structured Rule of Law Review by the cjeu in Respect of Preventative Expulsion or Entry of EU Citizens Deemed at Risk of Terrorism?
1 Introduction

2 Theoretical Perspectives – A Preventative Approach to Combating Terrorism in EU Directive on Combatting Terrorism
2.1Introduction

2.2A New Preventative Approach to Terrorism in EU Directive on Combating Terrorism

2.3Criticism in the Literature of the New Preventative Approach to Terrorism in the Directive on the Grounds It Challenges Legality and Hampers Effective Judicial Scrutiny


3 The cjeu and Refusal of Entry of a Suspected Terrorist Case C-300/11, zz

4 Time for Structured Rule of Law Review by the cjeu in Respect of Rreventative Expulsion of EU Citizens Deemed at Risk of Terrorism?

5 Conclusion


4The cjeu and the Public Health Derogation in a Pandemic? – Time to Review the Operation of a Rarely Invoked Derogation?
1 Introduction

2 The Public Health Derogation Pre the Pandemic – A Rarely Invoked Derogation

3 Key Challenging Circumstances for the Member States in the Covid 19 Public Health Emergency
3.1Introduction

3.2Key Challenges for the Member States in the Context of the Exercise of the Public Health Derogation in a Pandemic
3.2.1 National Emergency Restrictive Measures Which Are Brought in and Which May Breach Legality, a Key Tenet of the EU Rule of Law Standards

3.2.2. Differing Approaches to Interpretation of Scientific Evidence throughout the Covid 19 Pandemic

3.2.3 Diversity of Travel Restrictions

3.2.4 Protection of Health Care Systems of the Member States

3.2.5 Inconsistency in the Application of Covid Restrictive Measures


4 Time for the cjeu to Review the Operation of a Rarely Invoked Derogation?
4.1Introduction

4.2The cjeu and Reviewing the Exercise of the Public Health Derogation in an Era of Covid 19


5 Conclusion


5The cjeu and Anchoring a Meaningful Review of the Public Health Derogation in a Pandemic
1 Introduction

2 Anchoring a Rule of Law Review of the Public Health Derogation

3 The cjeu and More Meaningful Engagement with a Structured Rule of Law Review

4 Conclusion


Conclusion

Appendix 1Table of Treaties, Instruments and Legislation (in Date Order)

Appendix 2Table of Cases (in Alphabetical Order)

Bibliography

Index