The Equilibrium of Parliamentary Law-making: Comparative Perspectives on the Role of Courts in a Democracy: Routledge Research in Public Law
Autor Viktor Kazaien Limba Engleză Hardback – aug 2024
Preț: 934.72 lei
Preț vechi: 1139.90 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 1402
Preț estimativ în valută:
178.89€ • 185.82$ • 148.59£
178.89€ • 185.82$ • 148.59£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 04-18 februarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781032746463
ISBN-10: 1032746467
Pagini: 288
Ilustrații: 16
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.69 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Routledge Research in Public Law
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1032746467
Pagini: 288
Ilustrații: 16
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Greutate: 0.69 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Routledge Research in Public Law
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Public țintă
PostgraduateCuprins
Introduction; 1. The equilibrium of parliamentary law-making – A normative standard derived from the principles of constitutionalism; 2. The disturbance of the equilibrium – Non-compliance with the requirements of constitutionalism; 3. Guardians of the equilibrium – Non-judicial and judicial enforcement of the requirements of constitutionalism; 4. How to recognize disturbances in the equilibrium? – Standards in constitutional judicial review; 5. The preservation and restoration of the equilibrium – Judicial enforcement of the requirements of constitutionalism; 6. The extent of judicial influence in the equilibrium – Judicialization of parliamentary law-making; 7. A long road towards the achievement of equilibrium – Legislative riders in France; 8. An equilibrium never searched thus never found – Lack of public participation in law-making in Hungary; Conclusion
Notă biografică
Viktor Kazai is a post-doctoral researcher at the Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium. He often collaborates with human rights NGOs and gives advice in strategic cases litigated at domestic apex courts and the European Court of Human Rights.
Descriere
This work investigates the constitutional significance of the irregularities of parliamentary law-making and explores the role that courts play in the remedy of these flaws. It combines theoretical analysis with case-law-centered comparative research covering a large number of decisions by apex courts operating in various jurisdictions.