Cantitate/Preț
Produs

The European Court of Justice as a Context-Conscious Lawmaker

Autor Urška Šadl
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 7 aug 2024
Courts are context-conscious. They solve legal disputes with societal impact in mind, using interpretive tools and procedural means. This book develops concepts and methods for a systematic and legally informative analysis of this complex process. The evidence delivered prompts a conversation about the authority courts have to change the law. The analysis focuses on the European Court of Justice and its free movement case law. The framework and theory, however, are relevant to courts and case law everywhere. This is a compelling and intriguing examination of the ECJ and its shaping of a key tenet of EU law.
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 50742 lei

Preț vechi: 73114 lei
-31% Nou

Puncte Express: 761

Preț estimativ în valută:
9711 10213$ 8089£

Carte disponibilă

Livrare economică 13-27 decembrie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781509968121
ISBN-10: 1509968121
Pagini: 256
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 19 mm
Greutate: 0.5 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Hart Publishing
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Caracteristici

Explores the extent to which courts' interpretations and judgments are informed by their wider societal impacts

Notă biografică

Urska Sadl is Professor at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy, and Global Research Fellow at iCourts Centre of Excellence in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Cuprins

Introduction1. The Mechanisms and the Mechanics of Judginga. The Argumentb. The Puzzlec. The Structure (analysis)d. Motivation and Contributione. Chapter by Chapter OutlinePART I: The Analytical Framework2. Context Conscious Judging as the Object of Inquiry in Social Sciences and Legal Theorya. Theories of Judgingi. Maximizing Values (Consequentialism)ii. Minimizing Conflict (Incrementalism)iii. Maximizing Power (Strategy)iv. Maintaining Authority (Legal diplomacy)b. The European Court of Justice as the Object of Normative, Empirical, and Socio-Legal Inquiryi. The 'Integrationist' Reasoning (Critique of the Court)ii. The Court's Legal Means and its Political Success3. Good Judgment as a Distinct Form of Context Conscious Judginga. Prototype of Judicial Decision-Makingb. Good Judgments as a Departure from the Prototypei. Good Judgment and the 'Correct' Meaning of the Normii. Deferenceiii. Restriction-Justification Reasoningc. A Typology of Good Judgmenti. Europeanization Without Sanctionii. Deferential Upholding of European Rightsiii. Bounded Interpretation4. Approach and Methoda. The Annotation Process: Nuance in a Comprehensive Analysis of Case Lawb. The Legal Characteristics of Free Movement Case Lawc. Reconstructing Case Context: Facts, Institutional Factors, and PoliticsPART II: The Mechanics of Discreet Judgments / Analysis5. Personsa. The Rights and the Reality of Free Movement / Choice of Policy Areab. Emblematic Casesi. Non-Sanctioning Europeanization of National Policies: Groenerv Factsv Justificationv Contextv Implicationsii. Deferential Upholding of European Rights: Vaassen-Göbbelsv Factsv Justificationv Contextv Implicationsiii. Bounded Interpretation: Blaizotv Factsv Justificationv Contextv Implicationsc. Good Judgment 1954 - 2020: Trends and Patterns6. Goodsa. The National Product in the Common Marketb. Three Forms of Justification: Emblematic Casesc. The Forms of Reasoning 1954 - 2020: Trends and PatternsPART III: The Mechanism(s)Varieties of Good Judgment in Free Movement Case Lawd. Case Motivated Good Judgmenti. Reconstructing the Factsii. Personal Characteristics of Applicantse. The Institutional Changes and Good Judgmenti. The Chamber Systemii. The Sitting Formation and the Working Culturef. Externally Motivated Good Judgmenti. Reconstructing the Broader Economic and Political Contextii. Vital State Interests and European Rightsg. Other Forms of Good Judgmenti. Good Judgment as Exceptional Events / Limitations of the Analysisii. Presentation of Facts in Judgmentsiii. Selective Treatment of Precedentsh. Temporal Dynamics of Good JudgmentConclusion7. The Implications of Discreet Judginga. Summary of the Argument and the Main Findings of the Analysisb. Normative Considerationsc. Toward a Revisionist Theory of Judicial Lawmaking