The Management of Scientific Integrity within Academic Medical Centers
Autor Peter Snyder, Linda C. Mayes, William E. Smithen Limba Engleză Paperback – 7 ian 2015
- Shows how complex most scientific integrity cases are, and how little is clear cut in the adjunction of each
- Discusses how timely and important scientific misconduct is, and its impact on science at large
- Reviews the current regulations and policies that guide how we manage scientific integrity
- Examines this complexity in 8 anonymous case studies
- Concludes with a section authored by an expertly qualified federal court judge
Preț: 224.57 lei
Preț vechi: 272.62 lei
-18% Nou
Puncte Express: 337
Preț estimativ în valută:
42.98€ • 45.34$ • 35.92£
42.98€ • 45.34$ • 35.92£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 25 decembrie 24 - 08 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780124051980
ISBN-10: 0124051987
Pagini: 224
Ilustrații: colour illustrations
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 12 mm
Greutate: 0.3 kg
Editura: ELSEVIER SCIENCE
ISBN-10: 0124051987
Pagini: 224
Ilustrații: colour illustrations
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 12 mm
Greutate: 0.3 kg
Editura: ELSEVIER SCIENCE
Public țintă
Students/researchers interested in science and ethics, graduate students in public policy and in the biomedical sciences (across disciplines), faculty at academic medical centers, and those engaged in healthcare administration who must manage the oversight of scientific integrity. Psychologists and trainees as well..
Cuprins
1. Foreward2. Introduction - Impact of cases on public trust and perception of science3. The Management of scientific integrity in Biomedical Research Institutions4. Case studies:A) Submission of Fraudulent data to peer-review journal: what is the role of the lab head/mentor?B) Stealing data from colleagues and presenting at meeting without co-author's permissionC) Breaking and entering animal care facility of former employer, and wrongful use of laboratory animalsD) Failure to perform research described in Federal grant. Fraud vs. incompetenceE) Authorship dispute between faculty and postdoctoral fellowF) Disagreement among authors regarding presentation of dataG) Postdoctoral fellow reporting on experiments in paper, some of which not completed as reportedH) Use of knock-out mouse model in experiments and publications without permission
Recenzii
"...meaningful in the way it describes how this misconduct impacts society and the scientific community and presents case studies to systematically shed light on the intricacies of research misconduct. The book's unique structure facilitates its central thesis very well...Score: 89 - 3 Stars" --Doody's