Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
The Punters' Guide to Democracy: What it is, Sadly; and What it Could be, Gladly de Peter Emerson

The Punters' Guide to Democracy: What it is, Sadly; and What it Could be, Gladly

Autor Peter Emerson
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 6 oct 2022
This book discusses multiple ways of voting in a democratic system and explains the basis of more consensual politics. Without delving into too much technical argument or too many mathematical examples, it aims to
  • show that binary decision-making is blunt, primitive, divisive, and sometimes inaccurate;
  • prove that other methodologies are more accurate and, therefore, more democratic;
  • highlight more inclusive and effective voting procedures;
  • discuss electoral reforms for national parliaments and international forums like the UN Security Council and COP26/27.
The book is written not just for academia, or for the politicians and journalists, or for other specialists; it is for the general public: for students still at school, for voters in society at large, and for activists in umpteen NGOs.
“…the West's relentless pursuit of binary voting… has been a cause of countless tragedies. This book is brilliant: political controversies should rarely if ever be 'resolved' by majority vote.”
Arend Lijphart, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of California, San Diego
“[for] those who do not believe in a black-or-white world… a very important and extremely timely contribution…”
Věra Stojarová, Associate Professor of Political Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
“Peter’s challenge to the binary “win-lose” approach is urgently necessary, as is his proposal for an eminently more reasonable, accountable, and participatory system.”
Dr. Valery Perry, Democratization Policy Council, Sarajevo
“…the preferential points vote… would be the more accurate way to make decisions, and the consequences far more peaceful.”
Lord Boyce, House of Lords
“He builds a case for a specific version of preferential procedure, not only for elections, but for decision making as well.”
Hannu Nurmi, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of Turku, Finland
“A particularly strong plea in favour of voting procedures… which go far beyond the usual 'yes or no' ballots. [He uses] an alert prose and a wealth of illuminating and easily graspable examples.”
Maurice Salles, Emeritus Professor, Université de Caen Normandie
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 17620 lei

Nou

Puncte Express: 264
Preț estimativ în valută:
3372€ • 3513$ • 2804£

Carte disponibilă

Livrare economică 20 ianuarie-03 februarie 25
Livrare express 04-10 ianuarie 25 pentru 4173 lei

 Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9783031069864
ISBN-10: 3031069862
Pagini: 135
Ilustrații: XL, 135 p. 28 illus., 8 illus. in color.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 x 22 mm
Greutate: 0.25 kg
Ediția:1st ed. 2022
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Springer
Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland

Cuprins

Chapter 1. AI, Artificial Incompetence – The Ubiquitous Use of Binary Voting.- Chapter 2. Oh Lord, Give Me Consensus, but not Yet – Pluralism is Possible.- Chapter 3. The Art and Science of Compromise.- Chapter 4. The GOAT is a GNU – Electing an All-party Power-sharing Executive.- Chapter 5. “The People Have Voted… the [Expletives]!” – Comparing Electoral Systems.- Chapter 6. A Little Long History of Voting Systems.- Chapter 7. A Consensual Milieu.

Recenzii

“The Punter’s Guide, he gives a survey of voting and of decision making processes and systems … . He looks beyond just ‘western’ practices ... he makes it easy to understand through explanation as well as his engaging style of writing. Throughout his work he offers a different model for elections or other decisionmaking processes. ... Emerson’s long history of work on this issue remains evergreen, and the tools being freely offered online remove any excuses … .” (Valery Perry, democratizationpolicy.org, October, 2023)

Notă biografică


Peter Emerson is Director of the Belfast-based international NGO "The de Borda Institute" (Ireland). He has campaigned for inclusive governance since 1978. His publications include From Majority Rule to Inclusive Politics (Springer, 2016), Defining Democracy: Voting Procedures in Decision-Making, Elections and Governance (2nd ed. in 2012, Springer), Majority Voting as a Catalyst of Populism (Springer, 2020), and Designing an All-Inclusive Democracy: Consensual Voting Procedures for Use in Parliaments, Councils and Committees (Springer, 2007).

Textul de pe ultima copertă

This book discusses multiple ways of voting in a democratic system and explains the basis of more consensual politics. Without delving into too much technical argument or too many mathematical examples, it aims to
  • show that binary decision-making is blunt, primitive, divisive, and sometimes inaccurate;
  • prove that other methodologies are more accurate and, therefore, more democratic;
  • highlight more inclusive and effective voting procedures;
  • discuss electoral reforms for national parliaments and international forums like the UN Security Council and COP26/27.
The book is written not just for academia, or for the politicians and journalists, or for other specialists; it is for the general public: for students still at school, for voters in society at large, and for activists in umpteen NGOs. “…the West's relentless pursuit of binary voting… has been a cause of countless tragedies. This book is brilliant: political controversies should rarely if ever be 'resolved' by majority vote.”
Arend Lijphart, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of California, San Diego
“[for] those who do not believe in a black-or-white world… a very important and extremely timely contribution…”
Věra Stojarová, Associate Professor of Political Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
“Peter’s challenge to the binary “win-lose” approach is urgently necessary, as is his proposal for an eminently more reasonable, accountable, and participatory system.”
Dr. Valery Perry, Democratization Policy Council, Sarajevo
“…the preferential points vote… would be the more accurate way to make decisions, and the consequences far more peaceful.”
Lord Boyce, House of Lords
“He builds a case for a specific version of preferential procedure, not only for elections, but for decision making as well.”
Hannu Nurmi, ProfessorEmeritus of Political Science, University of Turku, Finland
“A particularly strong plea in favour of voting procedures… which go far beyond the usual 'yes or no' ballots. [He uses] an alert prose and a wealth of illuminating and easily graspable examples.”
Maurice Salles, Emeritus Professor, Université de Caen Normandie

Caracteristici

Discusses the multiple ways of voting in a democratic system Shows that binary decision-making is blunt, primitive, divisive, and sometimes inaccurate Highlights the more inclusive and effective voting procedures