The Racial Order
Autor Mustafa Emirbayer, Matthew Desmonden Limba Engleză Paperback – 30 iul 2015
Proceeding from the bold and provocative claim that there never has been a comprehensive and systematic theory of race, Mustafa Emirbayer and Matthew Desmond set out to reformulate how we think about this most difficult of topics in American life. In The Racial Order, they draw on Bourdieu, Durkheim, and Dewey to present a new theoretical framework for race scholarship. Animated by a deep and reflexive intelligence, the book engages the large and important issues of social theory today and, along the way, offers piercing insights into how race actually works in America. Emirbayer and Desmond set out to examine how the racial order is structured, how it is reproduced and sometimes transformed, and how it penetrates into the innermost reaches of our racialized selves. They also consider how—and toward what end—the racial order might be reconstructed.
In the end, this project is not merely about race; it is a theoretical reconsideration of the fundamental problems of order, agency, power, and social justice. The Racial Order is a challenging work of social theory, institutional and cultural analysis, and normative inquiry.
In the end, this project is not merely about race; it is a theoretical reconsideration of the fundamental problems of order, agency, power, and social justice. The Racial Order is a challenging work of social theory, institutional and cultural analysis, and normative inquiry.
Preț: 320.05 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 480
Preț estimativ în valută:
61.24€ • 64.68$ • 50.97£
61.24€ • 64.68$ • 50.97£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 13-27 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780226253527
ISBN-10: 022625352X
Pagini: 520
Ilustrații: 1 halftone, 4 line drawings
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 30 mm
Greutate: 0.64 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: University of Chicago Press
Colecția University of Chicago Press
ISBN-10: 022625352X
Pagini: 520
Ilustrații: 1 halftone, 4 line drawings
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 30 mm
Greutate: 0.64 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: University of Chicago Press
Colecția University of Chicago Press
Notă biografică
Mustafa Emirbayer is professor of sociology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. Matthew Desmond is assistant professor of sociology and social studies at Harvard University. Together, they are the authors of Race in America, a companion to this volume.
Cuprins
1 A New Theoretical Framework for Race Scholarship
Part I Reflexivity
2 Race and Reflexivity
Part II Relationality
3 The Structures of the Racial Order
4 The Dynamics of the Racial Order
5 Interactions, Institutions, and Interstices
6 The Social Psychology of the Racial Order
Part III Reconstruction
7 Race and Reconstruction
8 Summary and Implications for Race Scholarship
Acknowledgments
Notes
Index
Part I Reflexivity
2 Race and Reflexivity
Part II Relationality
3 The Structures of the Racial Order
4 The Dynamics of the Racial Order
5 Interactions, Institutions, and Interstices
6 The Social Psychology of the Racial Order
Part III Reconstruction
7 Race and Reconstruction
8 Summary and Implications for Race Scholarship
Acknowledgments
Notes
Index
Recenzii
“The Racial Order is a landmark in the theoretical analysis of race relations. Integrating and building on ideas from some of the most important thinkers on intergroup relations, Emirbayer and Desmond provide a comprehensive framework that takes race scholarship to a higher level of illumination and will inform and provide direction for empirical scholarship. Look no further for a publication that addresses the complexities of racial life with explanatory power.”
“In this ambitious theoretical program, Emirbayer and Desmond intertwine structure and culture, Bourdieu and Pragmatism, Durkheim and psychoanalysis. Their empirical scholarship is wide-ranging. The Racial Order inspires moral clarity about the pernicious racialism that continues to divide the American civil sphere.”
“Race in its multiplicity and ineluctability has pervaded the modern world while paradoxically—or perhaps unsurprisingly?—evading comprehensive theorization. If the truth lies in the whole, as Hegel thought, that multi-dimensional racial whole has either been perverted in past racist biologism, flattened in class-reductivist Marxism or subjectivist psychologism, denied altogether in contemporary liberal color-blindness, or abandoned as a theoretical goal in pursuit of localized empiricism. Now, in this impressive interdisciplinary synthesis, Emirbayer and Desmond offer a bold and ambitious new framework for thinking of race that does justice to structure as well as agency, relationality and social psychology, recalcitrant white habitus and the transformational reconstructive ideal of racial democracy. Agree or disagree, every serious scholar of race will need to read this book.”
“The Racial Order is a daring, ambitious, and important book. With its demanding but much needed conceptual equipment, it is also challenging and rewarding. By broadening significantly the range of authors whose work informs contemporary views on racial dynamics, Emirbayer and Desmond take a gamble: they add important layers of complexity to what often feels like a well-trodden sociological terrain. While The Racial Order will certainly generate debates, it should entice us to plough new paths for inquiry in what is perhaps the most highly politicized field of knowledge production in the social sciences. May social scientists committed to the pursuit of racial democracy and social justice raise to the occasion! It is well worth the effort.”
“This work begins with a compelling statement: ‘There never has been a comprehensive and systematic theory of race.’ The authors attempt to provide just that, drawing on and intricately interweaving nearly all prior race scholarship, with a special emphasis on the work of Dewey, Durkheim, and Bourdieu. Their approach stands out from prior frameworks by demanding greater attention to culture, making space for social psychology and collective emotions, emphasizing racial agency at every analytic level, and rejecting a binary between structure and culture.”