The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society: Theory of Communicative Action, cartea 1
Autor Jurgen Habermas, Juergen Habermas Traducere de Thomas Mccarthyen Limba Engleză Paperback – 28 feb 1985
Preț: 355.76 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 534
Preț estimativ în valută:
68.09€ • 71.82$ • 56.90£
68.09€ • 71.82$ • 56.90£
Carte indisponibilă temporar
Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:
Se trimite...
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780807015070
ISBN-10: 0807015075
Pagini: 512
Dimensiuni: 153 x 230 x 38 mm
Greutate: 0.76 kg
Ediția:None.
Editura: Beacon Press
Seria Theory of Communicative Action
ISBN-10: 0807015075
Pagini: 512
Dimensiuni: 153 x 230 x 38 mm
Greutate: 0.76 kg
Ediția:None.
Editura: Beacon Press
Seria Theory of Communicative Action
Notă biografică
Jürgen Habermas (born June 18, 1929) is a German sociologist and philosopher in the tradition of critical theory and pragmatism.
Recenzii
"A substantial study that displays all the rigour and systemicity, the vision and the originality, which have justly earned Habermas the reputation of being the foremost social and political thinker in Germany today ... The Theory of Communicative Action represents a major contribution to contemporary social theory. Not only does it provide a compelling critique of some of the main perspectives in twentieth-century philosophy and social science, but it also presents a systematic synthesis of the many themes that have preoccupied Habermas for thirty years." ߝ Times Literary Supplement
"One of the broadest, most comprehensive, elaborately and intensely theoretical works in social theory. Social theory and philosophy may never be the same again" ߝ Philosophy and Social Criticism
"One of the broadest, most comprehensive, elaborately and intensely theoretical works in social theory. Social theory and philosophy may never be the same again" ߝ Philosophy and Social Criticism
Textul de pe ultima copertă
The key to his notion of reaching understanding is the possibility of using reasons or grounds to gain intersubjective recognition for criticizable validity claims.