The Thinking Reed: Intellectuals and the Soviet State 1917 to the Present
Autor Boris Kagarlisky Traducere de Brian Pearceen Limba Engleză Paperback – 30 iun 1989
Preț: 296.05 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 444
Preț estimativ în valută:
56.66€ • 58.85$ • 47.06£
56.66€ • 58.85$ • 47.06£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 13-27 ianuarie 25
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780860919612
ISBN-10: 0860919617
Pagini: 384
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 22 mm
Greutate: 0.56 kg
Ediția:Rev
Editura: VERSO
ISBN-10: 0860919617
Pagini: 384
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 22 mm
Greutate: 0.56 kg
Ediția:Rev
Editura: VERSO
Notă biografică
Boris Kagarlitsky is the author of The Thinking Reed, The Dialectic of Hope, and The Mirage of Modernisation. He has been arrested twice for his activism, once in 1982 under Brezhnev, and in 1993 under Yeltsin.
Recenzii
“Kagarlitsky’s analysis ... is the most acute and substantial so far available ... Among the utterly absorbing acts of witness now reaching us from the Soviet Union, this chronicle, with its proudly Pascalian title, occupies an eminent place.”—George Steiner, The Sunday Times
“An excellent cram course in Soviet intellectual history for the non-specialist civilian.”—The Voice Literary Supplement
“This extraordinarily impressive book, full of surprising insights, shows the intensity of unofficial life behind officaldom.”—Anthony Barnett, Observer
“The book succeeds on the strength of the author’s conclusive demonstration of the vitality and variety of left democratic thought in the Soviet Union and by his elaborate mastery of the sources. The best of its kind.”—Library Journal
“Ambitious, earnest, impassioned.”—Washington Post
“An excellent cram course in Soviet intellectual history for the non-specialist civilian.”—The Voice Literary Supplement
“This extraordinarily impressive book, full of surprising insights, shows the intensity of unofficial life behind officaldom.”—Anthony Barnett, Observer
“The book succeeds on the strength of the author’s conclusive demonstration of the vitality and variety of left democratic thought in the Soviet Union and by his elaborate mastery of the sources. The best of its kind.”—Library Journal
“Ambitious, earnest, impassioned.”—Washington Post