The enlightenment revolutionized thinking. But it was not a beginning of thinking. Thought had taken a lengthy voyage through history. Most of this journey has been a bumbling in the dark, with a few bright spots from Socrates to Aristotle. The enlightenment shown a light on the nature of thinking and the Right of men. Yet, almost within a decade, it fell right back into the dark. Thinkers touched on a profound truth and either failed to continue along those lines of reason or knew the consequences, thus keeping it silent. The best of them guessed at something bigger, attributing man's nature to the authority of his concept of god. In theory, men were as free as a god that they created. In practice though, men remain slaves. This book makes one single solitary claim: Men are not property Through this obvious statement, it shows: Constructs of other men cannot morally be held as authority over the individual. That the notion of a definable object called a Right is not accessible to anyone but the individual. The State does not gain authority to define any Right. That the State misrepresents itself confusing the epistemology of men. The State claims moral responsibility but only possesses aggression and violence."